Innovation, effectuation, and uncertainty

References

• Alsos, G. A., Clausen, T. H., Mauer, R., Read, S., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2019). Effectual exchange: From entrepreneurship to the disciplines & beyond. Small Business Economics, 54(3), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00146-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2005). How do entrepreneurs organize firms under conditions of uncertainty? Journal of Management, 31(5), 776–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, C. (2015). Innovation as a creative response. A reappraisal of the Schumpeterian legacy. History of Economic Ideas, 23(2), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545149.00005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arend, R. J., Sarooghi, H., & Burkemper, A. (2015). Effectuation as ineffectual? Applying the 3E theory-assessment framework to a proposed new theory of entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 630–651. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brettel, M., Mauer, R., Engelen, A., & Küpper, D. (2012). Corporate effectuation: Entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, M. (2000). Schumpeter and Keynes on investment and entrepreneurship. Economic Theory in the Light of Schumpeter’s Scientific Heritage. http://www1.feb.uva.nl/pp/bin/1080fulltext.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bstieler, L., & Gross, C. W. (2003). Measuring the effect of environmental uncertainty on process activities, project team characteristics, and new product success. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 18(2), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620310463079
   Google Scholar
• Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0019-8501(01)00203-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casson, M. (1982). The entrepreneur: An economic theory. Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Casson, M., Yeung, B., Basu, A., Bose, A., & Wadeson, N. (Eds.). (2006). The Oxford handbook of entrepreneurship. Oxford Handbooks.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, G. N., DeTienne, D. R., McKelvie, A., & Mumford, T. V. (2011). Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, R. (1988). Logic models of design. Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Deligianni, I., Voudouris, I., & Lioukas, S. (2017). Do effectuation processes shape the relationship between product diversification and performance in new ventures? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 349–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshpandé, R., & Farley, J. (1998). Measuring market orientation: Generalization and synthesis. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 2(3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009719615327
   Google Scholar
• Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., & Wiltbank, R. (2008b). Outlines of a behavioral theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 66(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S. D., Read, S., & Wiltbank, R. (2008a). Immortal firms in mortal markets? An entrepreneurial perspective on the “innovator’s dilemma”. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(3), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060810888982
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. (2018). Managers fail to innovate and academics fail to explain how. Management and Organization Review, 14(1), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2018.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. (1954). The practice of management. Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Olmos, M., & Ramírez-Alesón, M. (2017). How internal and external factors influence the dynamics of SME technology collaboration networks over time. Technovation, 64–65, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freel, M. S. (2005). Perceived environmental uncertainty and innovation in small firms. Small Business Economics, 25(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-4257-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gales, L., & Mansour-Cole, D. (1995). User involvement in innovation projects: Toward an information processing model. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12(1–2), 77–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-4748(95)00005-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. M. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. J. (2009). Co‐opetition and technological innovation in small and medium‐sized enterprises: A multilevel conceptual model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 308–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627x.2009.00273.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinstein, A. (2008). The relationships between market orientation and alternative strategic orientations. European Journal of Marketing, 42(1/2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560810840934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F.,sJr, Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmda.2017.10008574
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11–2018-0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heavey, C., & Simsek, Z. (2013). Top management compositional effects on corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating role of perceived technological uncertainty. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 837–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalonen, H. (2012). The uncertainty of innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Research, 4(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v4i1.1039
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231426.n5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchhoff, B. A., Linton, J. D., & Walsh, S. T. (2013). Neo‐Marshellian equilibrium versus Schumpeterian creative destruction: Its impact on business research and economic policy. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Hart, Schaffner and Marx.
   Google Scholar
• Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolko, J. (2010). Abductive thinking and sensemaking: The drivers of design synthesis. Design Issues, 26(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2010.26.1.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiser, P., & Marino, L. (2002). Analyzing the historical development of the environmental uncertainty construct. Management Decision, 40(9), 895–905. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740210441090
   Google Scholar
• Latham, S. F., & Braun, M. (2009). Managerial risk, innovation, and organizational decline. Journal of Management, 35(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loch, C. H., Solt, M. E., & Bailey, E. M. (2008). Diagnosing unforeseeable uncertainty in a new venture. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00281.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthfa, S. (2019). A study of how uncertainty emerges in the uncertainty-embedded innovation process. Journal of Innovation Management, 7(1), 46–79. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_007.001_0005
   Google Scholar
• Mansoori, Y., & Lackéus, M. (2019). Comparing effectuation to discovery-driven planning, prescriptive entrepreneurship, business planning, lean startup, and design thinking. Small Business Economics, 54(3), 791–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00153-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martina, R. A. (2019). Toward a theory of affordable loss. Small Business Economics, 54(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00151-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzarol, T., & Reboud, S. (2017). Entrepreneurship and innovation. Tilde Publishing. Chapter 8 – Risk management in innovation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9412-6_8
   Google Scholar
• McKelvie, A., Chandler, G. N., DeTienne, D. R., & Johansson, A. (2019). The measurement of effectuation: Highlighting research tensions and opportunities for the future. Small Business Economics, 54(3), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00149-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvie, A., Haynie, J. M., & Gustavsson, V. (2011). Unpacking the uncertainty construct: Implications for entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783479801.00007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milliken, F. J. (1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. The Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paladino, A. (2007). Investigating the drivers of innovation and new product success: A comparison of strategic orientations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(6), 534–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00270.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. T., Chandler, G. N., & Markova, G. (2012). Entrepreneurial effectuation: A review and suggestions for future research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00435.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichlak, M. (2016). The innovation adoption process: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(4), 476–494. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2015.52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, S., Song, M., & Smit, W. (2009). A meta-analytic review of effectuation and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(6), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reymen, I., Berends, H., Oudehand, R., & Stultiëns, R. (2017). Decision making for business model development: A process study of effectuation and causation in new technology‐based ventures. R&D Management, 47(4), 595–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS n3.2.9. SmartPLS. https://www.smartpls.com
   Google Scholar
• Roach, D. C., Ryman, J. A., & Makani, J. (2016). Effectuation, innovation and performance in SMEs: An empirical study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(2), 214–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-12-2014-0119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy, S. D. (2003). Entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848440197.00019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., Read, S., & Wiltbank, R. (2008). Designing organizations that design environments: Lessons from entrepreneurial expertise. Organization Studies, 29(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy, D. K., Simon, H. A., & Lave, L. (1998). Perceiving and managing business risks: Differences between entrepreneurs and bankers. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 33(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(97)00092-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development (1936 ed.). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). The creative response in economic history. The Journal of Economic History, 7(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700054279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S. (2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade award: Delivering on the promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48543-0_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicotte, H., & Bourgault, M. (2008). Dimensions of uncertainty and their moderating effect on new product development project performance. R&D Management, 38(5), 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00531.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1993). Strategy and organizational evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., Busi, M., Ball, P., & Van der Meer, R. (2008). Factors influencing an organisation’s ability to manage innovation: A structured literature review and conceptual model. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(4), 655–676. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781786346520_0004
   Google Scholar
• Song, M., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (2001). The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatikonda, M. V., & Rosenthal, S. R. (2000). Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: A deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.820727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., & Schwartz, A. (1997). The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk taking: An experimental test. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 647–661. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomke, S. H. (2020). Experimentation works: The surprising power of business experiments. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ting, H., Wang, H., & Wang, D. (2012). The moderating role of environmental dynamism on the influence of innovation strategy and firm performance. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 3(5), 517. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijimt.2012.v3.288
   Google Scholar
• Varis, M., & Littunen, H. (2010). Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entrepreneurial SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 128–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061011040221
   Google Scholar
• Verhees, F., & Meulenberg, M. (2004). Market orientation, innovativeness, product innovation, and performance in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 134–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627x.2004.00102.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, P., & Burks, A. W. (eds.). (1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 8). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1038/135131a0
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. A., & Pett, T. L. (2006). Small-firm performance: Modeling the role of product and process improvements. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627x.2006.00167.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar