Governing expectations of forensic innovations in society: the case of FDP in Germany

References

• Amelung, N., R. Granja, and H. Machado. 2020. “Communicating Forensic Genetics: ‘Enthusiastic’ Publics and the Management of Expectations.” In Exploring Science Communication, edited by S. Davies and U. Felt, 209–226. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Amicelle, A., C. Aradau, and J. Jeandesboz. 2015. “Questioning Security Devices: Performativity, Resistance, Politics.” Security Dialogue 46: 293–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010615586964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2010. “Preemption, Precaution, Preparedness: Anticipatory Action and Future Geographies.” Progress in Human Geography 34 (6): 777–798. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayerische Staatskanzlei. 2018. “Gesetz über die Aufgaben und Befugnisse der Bayerischen Staatlichen Polizei (Polizeiaufgabengesetz – PAG) [Law on the Tasks and Competences of the Bavarian State Police].” Accessed August 15, 2019. https://www.gesetze-bayern.de/Content/Document/BayPAG/true.
   Google Scholar
• Borup, M., N. Brown, K. Konrad, and H. Van Lente. 2006. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3/4): 285–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N., and M. Michael. 2003. “A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15 (1): 3–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0953732032000046024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, N. 2018. “Forensic DNA Phenotyping Legislation Cannot Be Based on ‘Ideal FDP’ – A Response to Caliebe, Krawczak, and Kayser (2017).” Forensic Science International: Genetics 34: e13–e14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz. 2019a. “Gesetzgebungsverfahren – Gesetz zur Modernisierung des Strafverfahrens.” Accessed September 14, 2020. https://www.bmjv.de/SharedDocs/Gesetzgebungsverfahren/DE/Modernisierung_Strafverfahren.html;jsessionid=9E9A209731071CBEB4E784B5CD101636.2_cid289?nn=6705022.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz. 2019b. “Gesetzentwurf der Bundesregierung: Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Modernisierung des Strafverfahrens.” 1–61.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., O. Wæver, and J. Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Caliebe, A., M. Krawczak, and M. Kayser. 2018. “Predictive Values in Forensic DNA Phenotyping are Not Necessarily Prevalence-Dependent.” Forensic Science International Genetics 33: e7–e8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliebe, A., S. Walsh, F. Liu, M. Kayser, and M. Krawczak. 2017. “Likelihood Ratio and Posterior Odds in Forensic Genetics: Two Sides of the Same Coin.” Forensic Science International: Genetics 28: 203–210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, S. 2013. “Forensic Culture as Epistemic Culture: The Sociology of Forensic Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (1): 36–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.09.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gardner, J., G. Samuel, and C. Williams. 2015. “Sociology of Low Expectations.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 40 (6): 998–1021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915585579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granja, R., and H. Machado. 2020. “Forensic DNA Phenotyping and Its Politics of Legitimation and Contestation: Views of Forensic Geneticists in Europe.” Social Studies of Science. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720945033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granja, R., H. Machado, and F. Queirós. 2020. “The (De)Materialization of Criminal Bodies in Forensic DNA Phenotyping.” Body & Society. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X20919168.
   Google Scholar
• Hielscher, S., and P. Kivimaa. 2019. “Governance Through Expectations: Examining the Long-Term Policy Relevance of Smart Meters in the United Kingdom.” Futures 109: 153–169. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopman, R. 2020. “Opening up Forensic DNA Phenotyping: The Logics of Accuracy, Commonality, and Valuing.” New Genetics and Society 39 (4): 424–440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2020.1755638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kester, J., B. Sovacool, L. Noel, and G. Zarazua de Rubens. 2020. “Between Hope, Hype, and Hell: Electric Mobility and the Interplay of Fear and Desire in Sustainability Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35: 88–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, K., and C. Alvial Palavicino. 2017. “Evolving Patterns of Governance of, and by, Expectations: The Graphene Hype Wave.” In Embedding New Technologies into Society: A Regulatory, Ethical & Societal Perspective, edited by D. Bowman, E. Stokes, and A. Rip, 185–215. Singapore: Pan Stanford.
   Google Scholar
• Leese, M. 2014. “The New Profiling: Algorithms, Black Boxes, and the Failure of Anti-Discriminatory Safeguards in the European Union.” Security Dialogue 45 (5): 494–511. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614544204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipphardt, V. 2018. “Vertane Chancen? Die Aktuelle Politische Debatte Um Erweiterte DNA-Analysen in Ermittlungsverfahren.” Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 41 (3): 279–301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bewi.201801900
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lynch, M., S. Cole, R. McNally, and K. Jordan. 2008. Truth Machine: The Contentious History of DNA Fingerprinting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2004. “Qualitative Content Analysis.” In A Companion to Qualitative Research, edited by U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, and I. Steinke, 266–269. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• M’charek, A. 2020. “Tentacular Faces: Race and the Return of the Phenotype in Forensic Identification.” American Anthropologist 122 (2): 369–380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M’charek, A., K. Schramm, and D. Skinner. 2014. “Topologies of Race: Doing Territory, Population, and Identity in Europe.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 39 (4): 468–487. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913509493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavone, V., E. Santiago Gomez, and D.-O. Jaquet-Chifelle. 2016. “A Systemic Approach to Security: Beyond the Tradeoff Between Security and Liberty.” Democracy and Security 12 (4): 225–246. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2016.1217776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poirier, Jean, Simone Clapier-Valladon, and Paul Raybaut. 1983. Les Récits de Vie. Théorie et Pratique. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Rath, C. 2019. “Justizministerin zur DNA-Strafverfolgung: Das ist keine Stigmatisierung! [Justice Minister about DNA-criminal Prosecution: This is No Stigmatization!].” taz. https://taz.de/Justizministerin-zur-DNA-Strafverfolgung/!5625314.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and D. K. R. Robinson. 2013. “Constructive Technology Assessment and the Methodology of Insertion.” In Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening up the Laboratory. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, edited by N. Doorn, D. Schuurbiers, I. van de Poel, and M. Gorman. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7844-3_3.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel, G., and B. Prainsack. 2018a. “The Regulatory Landscape of Forensic DNA Phenotyping in Europe.” VISAGE. Accessed August 15, 2019. http://www.visage-h2020.eu/Report_regulatory_landscape_FDP_in_Europe2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel, G., and B. Prainsack. 2018b. “Forensic DNA Phenotyping in Europe: Views ‘on the Ground’ from Those Who Have a Professional Stake in the Technology.” New Genetics and Society 38 (2): 119–141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2018.1549984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, G., and B. Prainsack. 2019. “Civil Society Stakeholder Views on Forensic DNA Phenotyping: Balancing Risks and Benefits.” Forensic Science International: Genetics 43: 102157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, P., B. Prainsack, and M. Kayser. 2019. “The Use of Forensic DNA Phenotyping in Predicting Appearance and Biogeographic Ancestry.” Deutsches Aerzteblatt Online 51–52: 873–880.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skinner, D. 2020. “Race, Racism and Identification in the Era of Technosecurity.” Science as Culture 29 (1): 77–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2018.1523887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STS Freiburg Group. 2017. “Symposium Erweiterte DNA Analyse in der Forensik: Möglichkeiten, Herausforderungen, Risiken.” Accessed December 2, 2020. https://stsfreiburg.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/symposiumsinfos5.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Syndercombe-Court, Denise, Kristiina Reed, Robin Williams, and Matthias Wienroth. 2016. A Guide to Legal and Ethical Principles and Practices in Forensic Genetics.
   Google Scholar
• Toom, V. 2016. “Approaching Ethical, Legal and Social Issues of Emerging Forensic DNA Phenotyping (FDP) Technologies Comprehensively: Reply to ‘Forensic DNA Phenotyping: Predicting Human Appearance from Crime Scene Material for Investigative Purposes’ by Manfred Kayser.” Forensic Science International: Genetics 22: e1–e4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutton, R. 2011. “Promising Pessimism: Reading the Futures to Be Avoided in Biotech.” Social Studies of Science 41 (3): 411–429. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710397398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lente, H., and A. Rip. 1998. “Expectations in Technological Developments.” In Getting New Things Together, edited by C. Disco and B. J. R. van der Meulen, 195–220. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Vidaki, A., and M. Kayser. 2017. “From Forensic Epigenetics to Forensic Epigenomics: Broadening DNA Investigative Intelligence.” Genome Biology 18 (1): 238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1373-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, Gretchen. 2018. “In Germany, Controversial Law Gives Bavarian Police New Power to Use DNA.” Science. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/05/germany-controversial-law-gives-bavarian-police-new-power-use-dna.
   Google Scholar
• Weitz, S., and N. Buchanan. 2017. “Eine Technologie der Angstkultur.” Freispruch 11: 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wienroth, M. 2018. “Governing Anticipatory Technology Practices. Forensic DNA Phenotyping and the Forensic Genetics Community in Europe.” New Genetics and Society 37 (2): 137–152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2018.1469975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wienroth, M. 2020. “Socio-Technical Disagreements as Ethical Fora: Parabon NanoLab’s Forensic DNA SnapshotTM Service at the Intersection of Discourses Around Robust Science, Technology Validation, and Commerce.” BioSocieties 15: 28–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-018-0138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. 2000. Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zieger, M., and L. Roewer. 2019. “Plädoyer Für Eine Nationale Ethikkommission Für Die Erweiterte Forensische DNA-Analyse.” Rechtsmedizin 29 (5): 415–418. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-019-0328-0.
   Google Scholar