A knowledge audit of the managers of primary care organizations: top priority is how to use routinely collected clinical data for quality improvement

References

• Webb SP. Knowledge management: linchpin of change. London: Aslib; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. The National Knowledge Service (NKS). Available at: http://www.nks.nhs.uk/ (accessed 17 January 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Jadad AR, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JAMA 1998;279(8):611 – 614.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan F and Mitchell E. Has General practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports. BMJ 1995;311:848 – 852.
   Google Scholar
• Burns F. Information for health, an information strategy for a modern NHS, 1998 – 2005. A national strategy for local implementation. Leeds, UK: NHS Executive; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Confederation. GMS contract negotiations. Available at: http://www.nhsconfed.webhoster.co.uk/gms/ default.asp (accessed 17 January 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas D. Assessing information needs: tools, techniques and concepts for the Internet age. 2nd ed. London, Aslib; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Skryme DJ. Measuring the value of knowledge: metrics for the knowledge based business. London: Business Intelligence; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor A. Engaging with knowledge: emerging concepts in knowledge management. London: Aslib; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi M. The tacit dimension. London: Routledge; 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Takeuchi H, Nonaka I. The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Senge P. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organisation. London: Doubleday Currency; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Skryme D. Knowledge networking: creating the collaborative company. London: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen MT, Nobira N, Tierny T. What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harv Bus Rev 1999;77:106 – 116.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt JC. Clinical knowledge and practice in the information age: a handbook for health professionals. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Webber E, Nicholl J, Munro J, Knowles E. NHS Direct: consistency of triage outcomes. Emerg Med J 2003;20:289 – 292.
   Google Scholar
• de Lusignan S, Pritchard K, Chan T. A knowledge management tool for clinical practice. J Postgrad Med 2002;48:297 – 303.
   Google Scholar
• STaRNet (South Thames Primary Care Research Network) London. Available at: http://www.starnetlondon.org/ (accessed 17 January 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Hakim C. Secondary analysis in social research. London: Allen & Unwin; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes BM, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996;312:71 – 72
   Google Scholar
• National Health Service. The NHS Plan—A plan for investment—A plan for reform. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/PolicyAndGuidance/OrganisationPolicy/Modernisation/NHSPlan/fs/en?CONTENT_ID= 4082690&chk=/DU1UD
   Google Scholar
• Bandolier—Impact. Available at: http://www.jr2.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/ImpAct (accessed 17 January 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane Collaboration. EPOC (Effective Practice and Organisation of Care) Group. Available at: http:// www.epoc.uottawa.ca/ (accessed 17 January 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Jewell D. How to change clinical behaviour: no answers yet. Br J Gen Pract 2003;53(489):266 – 267.
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Walker AE, Thomas RE. Changing physicians’ behavior: what works and thoughts on getting more things to work. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2002;22(4):237 – 243.
   Google Scholar
• Davis D, Evans M, Jadad A, Perrier L, Rath D, Ryan D, Sibbald G, Straus S, Rappolt S, Wowk M, Zwarenstein M. The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ 2003;327(7405):33 – 35.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T. Intuition and evidence—uneasy bedfellows? Br J Gen Pract 2002;52(478):395 – 400.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien C, Camboropolous P. Combating information overload. A six-month pilot evaluation of a knowledge management system in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2000;50(466): 489– 490.
   Google Scholar
• de Lusignan S. The Doctors Desk. One vision of how to deliver the future information and communication needs of General Practice. J Inform Primary Care 1998;May:19 – 22.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau N, McColl E, Newton J, Grimshaw J, Eccles M. Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care. BMJ 2003;326(7384):314.
   Google Scholar
• de Lusignan S, Hague N, Yates C, Harvey M. A case study from a Sussex Primary Care Group: improving secondary prevention in coronary heart disease using an educational intervention. Br J Cardiol 2002:9(6);362 – 368.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Information Authority. PRIMIS for Hearts. Available at: http://www.primis.nhs.uk/pages/Publications/ Information_for_Hearts.pdf (accessed 17 January 2005).
   Google Scholar
• de Lusignan S, Stephens PN, Adal N, Majeed A. Does feedback improve the quality of computerized medical records in primary care? J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002;9(4):395 – 401.
   Google Scholar
• de Lusignan S. What is primary care informatics? J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10(4):304 – 309.
   Google Scholar
• de Lusignan S, Teasdale S. The features of an effective primary care data quality programme. In: Bryant J, editor. Current perspectives in healthcare computing, 2004. Proceedings of HC 2004. Swindon, UK: British Computer Society; 2004. p. 95 – 102.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Confederation. Briefing: New quality and outcomes under the new GMS contract. Available at: http://www.nhsconfed.webhoster.co.uk/docs/9quality.pdf (accessed 17 January 2005).
   Google Scholar