The economic consequences of multiple gestation pregnancy in assisted conception cycles

References

• American Fertility Society and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1992 results generated from The American Fertility Society/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertility and Sterility 1994; 62: 1121–1128
   Google Scholar
• Ansatklis AJ, Drakakis P, Vlazakis GP, Michalas S. Reduction of multifetal pregnancies to twins does not increase obstetric or perinatal risks. Human Reproduction 1999; 14: 1338–1340
   Google Scholar
• Bider D, Livshitz A, Tur Kaspa I, Shulman A, Levron J, Dor J. Incidence and perinatal outcome of multiple pregancies after intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared to standard in vitro fertilization. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1999; 16: 221–226
   Google Scholar
• Boyle MH, Torrance GW, Sinclair JC, Horwood SP. Economic evaluation of neonatal intensive care of very-low-birth-weight infants. New England Journal of Medicine 1983; 508: 1330–1337
   Google Scholar
• Briggs AH. Handling uncertainty in economic evaluation. British Medical Journal 1999; 319: 120–120
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Briggs AH, Mooney CZ, Wonderling DE. Constructing confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an evaluation of parametric and non-parametric techniques using Monte Carlo simulation. Statistics in Medicine 1999; 18: 3245–3262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan TL, Hall JE, Ettner SL, Christiansen CL, Greene MF, Crowley WF. The economic impact of multiple gestation pregnancies and the contribution of assisted reproduction. New England Journal of Medicine 1994; 331: 244–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelmow D, Pensias A, Kaufman G, Cetrulo C. Costs of triplet pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995; 172: 677–682
   Google Scholar
• Coleman CH, DeBuono BA. Developing public policy on assisted reproductive technologies: reflections on the work of the New York State Task Force on Life and Law. Fertility and Sterility 2000; 73: 21–23
   Google Scholar
• Collins JA, Bustillo M, Visscher RD, Lawrence LD. An estimate of the cost of in vitro fertilization services in the United States in 1995. Fertility and Sterility 1995; 64: 538–545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins JA, Feeny D, Gunby J. The cost of infertility diagnosis and treatment in Canada in 1995. Human Reproduction 1997; 12: 951–958
   Google Scholar
• Cruz JR, Dubey AK, Patel J, Peak D, Hartog B, Gindoff PR. Is blastocyst transfer useful as an alternative treatment for patients with multiple in vitro fertilization failures?. Fertility and Sterility 1999; 72: 218–220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Contribution of assisted reproductive technology and ovulation-inducing drugs to triplet and higherorder multiple births — United States 1980–1997. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2000; 49: 535–538
   Google Scholar
• Ebner T, Moser M, Yaman C, Feichtinger O, Hartl J, Tews G. Elective transfer of embryos selected on the basis of first polar body morphology is associated with increased rates of implantation and pregnancy. Fertility and Sterility 1999; 72: 599–603
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction 1998; 13: 3434–3440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garello C, Baker H, Rai J, Montgomery S, Wilson P, Kennedy CR, Hartshorne GM. Pronuclear orientation, polar body placement, and embryo quality after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization: further evidence for polarity in human oocytes?. Human Reproduction 1999; 14: 2588–2595
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerris J, De Neuberg D, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Van deMeerssche M, Valkenburg M. Prevention of twin pregnancy after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Human Reproduction 1999; 14: 2581–2587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleicher N, Oleske DM, Tur-Kaspa I, Vidali A, Karande V. Reducing the risk of high-order multiple pregnancy after ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins. New England Journal of Medicine 2000; 343: 2–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfarb JM, Austin C, Lisbona H, Peskin B, Clapp M. Cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996; 87: 18–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granberg M, Wikland M, Hamberger L. Financing of IVF/ET in the Nordic countries. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1998; 77: 63–67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzick DS, Carson SA, Coutifaris C, et al. Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. New England Journal of Medicine 1999; 340: 177–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority Annual Report. HFEA, London 1996
   Google Scholar
• , Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (1999) Live birth and multiple birth rates for IVF, HFEA. www.hfea.gov.uk/annrep99/table4.1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Karande VC, Korn A, Morris R, Rao R, Balin M, Rinchart J, Dohn K, Gleicher N. Prospective randomized trial comparing the outcome and cost of in vitro fertilization with that of a traditional treatment algorithm as first-line therapy for couples with infertility. Fertility and Sterility 1999; 71: 468–475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke B, Bigger HR, Leurgans S, Sietsema D. The cost of prematurity: a case-control study of twins vs singletons. American Journal of Public Health 1996; 86: 809–814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moise J, Laor A, Armon Y, Gur I, Gale R. The outcome of twin pregnancies after IVF. Human Reproduction 1998; 13: 1702–1705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann PJ, Weinstein MC, Gharib SD. The cost of a successful delivery with in vitro fertilization. New England Journal of Medicine 1994; 331: 239–243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papiernik E. Social cost of twin births. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae 1983; 32: 105–111
   Google Scholar
• Papiernik E. Costs of multiple pregnancies. The Stress of Multiple Births, D Harvey, E Bryan. Multiple Births Foundation, London 1991; 22–34, In
   Google Scholar
• Peterson CM, Hatasaka HH, Jones KP, Poulson AM, Carrell DT, Urry RL. Ovulation induction with gonadotropins and intrauterine insemination compared with in vitro fertilization and no therapy: a prospective, non-randomized, cohort study and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility 1994; 62: 535–544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips Z, Barraza-Llorens M, Posnett J. Evaluation of the relative cost-effectiveness of treatments for infertility in the UK. Human Reproduction 2000; 15: 95–106
   Google Scholar
• Scholz T, Bartholomaus S, Grimmer I, Kentenich H, Obladen M. Problems of multiple births after ART: medical, psychological, social and financial aspects. Human Reproduction 1999; 14: 2932–2937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serour GI, Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Sattar MA, Amin Y, Aboulghar H. Complications of medically assisted conception in 3,500 cycles. Fertility and Sterility 1998; 70: 638–642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1993 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertility and Sterility 1995; 64: 13–21
   Google Scholar
• Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1994 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertility and Sterility 1996; 66: 697–705
   Google Scholar
• Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1995 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertility and Sterility 1998; 69: 389–398
   Google Scholar
• Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States: 1996 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Technology/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertility and Sterility 1999; 71: 798–807
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson RC, McCabe CJ, Pharoah POD, Cooke RWI. Cost of care for a geographically determined population of low birthweight infants to age 8–9 years. I. Children without disability. Archives of Diseases in Childhood 1996a; 74: F114–F117
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson RC, McCabe CJ, Pharoah POD, Cooke RWI. Cost of care for a geographically determined population of low birthweight infants to age 8–9 years. II. Children with disability. Archives of Diseases in Childhood 1996b; 74: F118–F121
   Google Scholar
• Stovall DW, Allen BD, Sparks AET, Syrop CH, Saunders RG, van Voorhis BJ. The cost of infertility evaluation and therapy: findings of a self-insured university healthcare plan. Fertility and Sterility 1999; 72: 778–784
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Templeton A, Morris JK. Reducing the risk of multiple births by transfer of two embryos after in vitro fertilization. New England Journal of Medicine 1998; 339: 573–577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States 117 Table No. 169. Consumer Price Indexes of Mediacl Care Prices: 1980 to 1996, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority 1997
   Google Scholar
• van Voorhis BJ, Syrop CH, Allen BD, Sparks AET, Stovall DW. The efficacy and cost effectiveness of embryo cryopreservation compared with other assisted reproductive techniques. Fertility and Sterility 1995; 64: 647–650
   Google Scholar
• Vilska S, Tiitinen A, Hyden-Granskog C, Hovatta O. Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth. Human Reproduction 1999; 14: 2392–2395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler CA, Cole BF, Frishman GN, Seifer DB, Lovegreen SB, Hackett RJ. Predicting probabilities of pregnancy and multiple gestation from in vitro fertilization — a new model. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1998; 91: 696–700
   Google Scholar
• Wolner-Hanssen P, Rydhstroem H. Cost-effectiveness analysis of in vitro fertilization: estimated costs per successful pregnancy after transfer of one or two embryos. Human Reproduction 1998; 13: 88–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar