Stimulated Intrauterine Insemination: Efficient, cost-effective, safe?

References

• Balen, A. H., Braat, D. D., West, C., Patel, A., & Jacobs, H. S. (1994). Cumulative conception and live birth rates after treatment of anovulatory infertility: safety and efficacy of ovulation induction in 200 patients. Human Reproduction, 9, 1563–1570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohlen, B. J., Vandekerckhove, P., te Velde, E. R., & Habbema, J. D. F. (2004). Timed intercourse versus intra-uterine insemination with or without ovarian hyperstimulation for subfertility in men. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. (ISSN 1464-780X). Claman, P., Wilkie, V., & Collins, D. (2004). Timing intrauterine insemination either 33 or 39 hours after administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin yields the same pregnancy rates as after superovulation therapy. Fertility & Sterility, 82, 13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (2001). A Code of Practice for Tissue Banks. www.doh.gov.uk Department of Health (2002). Reforming NHS Financial Flows: payment by results. www.doh.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• Fauser, C. J. M., Devroey, P., Yen, S. S. C., Gosden, R., Crowley, W. F., Baird, D. T., & Bouchard, P. (1999). Minimal ovarian stimulation for IVF: appraisal of potential benefits and drawbacks. Human Reproduction, 14, 2681–2686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goverde, A. J., McDonnell, J., Vermeiden, J. P., Schats, R., Rutten, F. F., & Schoemaker, J. (2000). Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet, 355, 13– 18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzick, D. S., Carson, S. A., Coutifaris, C., Overstreet, J. W., Factor-Litvak, P., Steinkampf, M. P., et al. (1999). Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. New England Journal of Medicine, 340, 177– 183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzick, D. S., Sullivan, M. W., Adamson, G. D., Cedars, M. I., Falk, R. J., Peterson, E. P., & Steinkampf, M. P. (1998). Efficacy of treatment for unexplained infertility. Fertility & Sterility, 70, 207–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HFEA (2002). Patients’ Guide to IVF Clinics, Provisional Data, 21 Bloomsbury Street, London, WC1B 3HF
   Google Scholar
• HFEA(2003). Code of Practice– 6th Edition. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. 21 Bloomsbury Street, London, WC1B 3HF or www.hfea.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• HFEA (2004). Keynote address, Annual Conference, 2004, 21 Bloomsbury Street, London, WC1B 3HF
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, E. G. (1997). The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis. Human Reproduction, 12, 1865– 1872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledger, W. L. (2003). NICE and infertility—questions left unanswered. Trends in Urology Gynaecology and Sexual Health. Editorial, November/December.
   Google Scholar
• NICE Guideline (2004). Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health, RCOG Press, www.rcogbookshop.com or www.nice.org.uk/pdf/cg011.
   Google Scholar
• Ojha, K., Philips, Z., & Darne, F. J. (2003). Diagnosing infertility in a district general hospital: a case note and cost analysis. Human Fertility, 6, 169–173.
   Google Scholar
• Osuna, C., Matorras, R., Pijoan, J. I., & Rodriguez-Escudero, F. J. (2004). One versus two inseminations per cycle in intrauterine insemination with sperm from Patients’ husbands: a systematic review of the literature. Fertility and Sterility, 82, 17– 24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandian, Z., Bhattacharya, S., Nikolaou, D., Vale, L., & Templeton, A. (2004). In vitro fertilisation for unexplained infertility. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004. (ISSN 1464-780X).
   Google Scholar
• Ragni, G., Maggioni, P., Guermandi, E., Testa, A., Baroni, E., Columbo, M., et al. (1999). Efficacy of double intrauterine insemination in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. Fertility & Sterility, 72, 619– 622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steures, P., & van Der Steeg, J. W. (2004). Prediction of an ongoing pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertility & Sterility, 82, 45–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tissue Directive. (2003). Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells. Council of the European Union. Institutional File 2002/0128.
   Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, B. J., Sparks, A. E. T., Allen, B. D., Stovall, D. W., Syrop, C. H., & Chapler, F. G. (1997). Cost-effectiveness of infertility treatments: a cohort study. Fertility & Sterility, 67, 830–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. (1992). WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 3rd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. (1999). WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 4th edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zayed, F., Lenton, E. A., & Cooke, I. D. (1997). Comparison between stimulated in-vitro fertilisation and stimulated intrauterine insemination for the treatment of unexplained and mild male factor infertility. Human Reproduction, 12, 2408– 2413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar