Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the welfare of the child

References

• Atkinson H. G., & Handyside A. H. (1994). Preimplantation diagnosis. In L. Abramsky, & J. Chapple (Eds.), Prenatal diagnosis: The human side. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Black R. B. (1989). A 1 and 6 month follow up of prenatal diagnosis patients who lost pregnancies. Prenatal Diagnosis, 9, 795–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damewood M. D. (2001). Ethical implications of a new application of preimplantation diagnosis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 3143–3144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnai P., Charles, N., & Harris R. (1981). Attitudes of patients after “genetic” termination of pregnancy. British Medical Journal, 282(6264),621–622.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards R. G., & Gardner R. L. (1967). Sexing of live rabbit blastocysts. Nature, 214, 576–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards R. G., & Gardner R. L. (1968). Choosing sex before birth. New Scientist, 38, 218– 220.
   Google Scholar
• ESHRE taskforce ethics and law (2001). 1 The moral status of the preimplantation embryo. Human Reproduction, 16, 1046– 1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee (2002). ESHRE Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Consortium: data collection III. Human Reproduction, 17, 233– 246.
   Google Scholar
• Fasouliotis S. J., & Schenker J. G. (1998). Preimplantation genetic diagnosis principles and ethics. Human Reproduction, 13, 2238–2245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our postmodern future: consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Farrar, Strauss, & Giroux. Geraedts, J., Handyside, A., Harper J., Liebaers I., Sermon K., Staessen C., et al. (1999).ESHRE Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) Consortium: preliminary assessment of data from January 1997 to September 1998. ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee. Human Reproduction, 14, 3138–3148.
   Google Scholar
• Geraedts J., Handyside, A., Harper J., Liebaers I., Sermon K., Staessen, C., et al. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Consortium Steering Committee. (2000). ESHRE preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) consortium: data collection II. Human Reproduction, 15, 2673–2683.
   Google Scholar
• Gianaroli, L., Magli M. C., Ferraretti A. P., & Munne S. (1999).Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed. Fertility Sterility, 72, 837–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, J. (1985) Eugenics: some lessons from the Nazi experience. In Holm J.HarrisS., & (Eds.), The future of human reproduction (pp. 55– 65). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handyside, A. H., Pattinson J. K., Penketh, R. J., Delhanty J. D., Winston R. M., & Tuddenham, E. G. (1989). Biopsy of human preimplantation embryos and sexing by DNA amplification. Lancet, Feb 18, 1(8634),347– 349.
   Google Scholar
• Handyside A. H., Kontogianni E. H., Hardy, K., & Winston, R.M. (1990). Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature, 344(6268),768–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy K., Martin K. L., Leese, H. J., Winston R. M., &Handyside A. H. (1990). Human preimplantation development in vitro is not adversely affected by biopsy at the 8-cell stage. Human Reproduction, 6, 708–714.
   Google Scholar
• HFEA 6th Code of Practice (2004). www.hfea.gov.uk/HFEAPublications/CodeofPractice Human Fertility and Embryology Act 1990. www.hmso.gov.uk/ acts/acts1990 International Working Group on Preimplantation Genetics(2001). Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: experience of 3000 clinical cycles. Report of the 11th Annual Meeting. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 3, 49– 53.
   Google Scholar
• King, D. S. (1999). Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the ‘new’ eugenics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 25, 176– 182. Lavery S. A., & Winston R. M. (1999). Clinical experience of a preimplantation genetic diagnosis programme: Hammersmith 1989–1998. In Jansen R., & Mortimer D. (Eds.), Towards reproductive certainty: fertility and genetics beyond 1999. London: Parthenon.
   Google Scholar
• Lavery, S. A., Aurell, R., Turner, C., Castello, C., Veiga, A., Barri, P. N., & Winston, R. M. (2002). Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: patients’ experiences and attitudes. Human Reproduction, 17, 2464– 2467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis C.M., Pinel T., Whittaker,J.C.,&Handyside,A.H. (2001).Controlling misdiagnosis errors in preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a comprehensive model encompassing extrinsic and intrinsic sources of error. Human Reproduction, 16, 43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson J. A. (2003). Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: medical and non-medical uses. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29, 213–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savulescu J. (2002). Education and debate: Deaf lesbians, “designer disability,” and the future of medicine. British Medical Journal, 325(7367), 771– 773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sermon, K. (1998). Diagnostic accuracy in preimplantation diagnosis in single cell PCR for Mendelian disorders. In Kempers R., Cohen J., Haney A. F., & Younger J. B. (Eds.), Fertility and reproductive medicine, Proceedings of the XVI World Congress on Fertility and Sterility San Francisco 4– 9 October 1998 (pp. 687– 695). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sermon K. (2002). Current concepts in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD): a molecular biologist’s view. Human Reproduction Update, 8, 11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenfield F., Pennings, G., Devroey P., Sureau, C., Tarlatzis, B.,& Cohen J. (2003). ESHRE Ethics Task Force. Taskforce 5: preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Human Reproduction, 18, 649–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson J. L. (2001). Changing indications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Molecular and Cell Endocrinology, 183(Suppl 1), S69–S75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soussis I., Harper J. C., Handyside A. H., & Winston R. M. L. (1996a). Obstetric outcome of pregnancies resulting from embryos biopsied for preimplantation diagnosis of inherited disease. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 103, 784– 788.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soussis I., Harper, J. C., Kontogianni E. Paraschos T., Packham D., Handyside A.H., & Winston R. M. (1996). Pregnancies resulting from embryos biopsied for preimplantation diagnosis of genetic disease: biochemical and ultrasonic studies in the first trimester of pregnancy. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 13, 254–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock G. (2002). Redesigning humans: our inevitable genetic future.New York: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Strom C. M., & Rechitsky S. (1991). DNA analysis of polar bodies and pre-embryos. In Y. Verlinsky, & A. Kuliev (Eds.), Preimplantation diagnosis of genetic disease (pp. 69– 91). New York: Wiley-Leiss.
   Google Scholar
• Strom C. M., Levin, R., Strom, S., Masciangelo, C., Kuliev A.& Verlinsky Y. (2000). Neonatal outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis by polar body removal: the first 109 infants. Pediatrics, 106, 650– 653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar