Qualitative research in fertility and reproduction: Does it have any value?

References

• Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1980
   Google Scholar
• Allan H. ‘A good enough’ nurse: supporting patients in a fertility unit. Nursing Inquiry 2001; 8: 51–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker T. L. Doing social research2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, Toronto 1994
   Google Scholar
• Baker L., Lavender T., Tincello D. Factors that influence women's decisions about whether to participate in research: An exploratory study. Birth 2005; 32: 60–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black N. Why we need qualitative research. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health 1994; 48: 425–426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blenner J. L. Passage through infertility treatment: A stage theory, IMAGE:. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 1990; 22: 153–158
   Google Scholar
• Bourguignon O., Navelet C., Fourcault D. Psychological study of 20 women after failed in vitro fertilisation attempts. Contraception, Fertilité, Sexualité 1998; 26: 663–673
   Google Scholar
• Britten N. Qualitative research: Qualitative interviews in medical research. British Medical Journal 1995; 311: 251–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callan V. J., Kloske B., Kashima Y., Hennessey J. F. Toward understanding women's decisions to continue or stop in vitro fertilization: The role of social, psychological, and background factors. Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer 1988; 5: 363–369
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daniluk J. C. Reconstructing their lives: A longitudinal, qualitative analysis of the transition to biological childlessness for infertile couples. Journal of Counseling & Development 2001; 79: 439–449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lacey S. IVF as a lottery or investment: contesting metaphors in discourses of infertility. Nursing Inquiry 2002; 9: 43–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Earle S., Letherby G. Whose choice is it anyway? Decision-making, control and conception. Human Fertility 2002; 5: 39–41
   Google Scholar
• Eugster A., Vingerhoets A. J. J. M. Psychological aspects of in-vitro fertilisation: A review. Social Science and Medicine 1999; 48: 575–589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner G. The nurse researcher: an added dimension to qualitative research methodology. Nursing Inquiry 1996; 3: 153–158
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T., Taylor R. How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). British Journal of Medicine 1997; 315: 740–743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinyer A. The Narrative Correspondence method: What a follow up study can tell us about the longer term effect on participants in emotionally demanding research. Qualitative Health Research 2004; 14: 1326–1341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris L. E., Swindle R. W., Mungai S. M., Weinberger M., Tierney W. M. Measuring patient satisfaction for quality improvement. Medical Care 1999; 37: 1207–1213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry Shears K. Many uses for Qualitative Research Findings guide study and program design, help explain quantitative data, and explore new issues. Network 2002; 22(2)
   Google Scholar
• Jaye C. Doing qualitative research in general practice: methodological utility and engagement. Family Practice 2002; 19: 557–562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernick D. P., Reinhold D. M., Mitchell A. How should patients consult? A study of the differences in viewpoint between doctors and patients. Family Practice 1999; 16: 562–565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mays N., Pope C. Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal 2000; 320: 50–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunkoosing K. The problem with interviews. Qualitative Health Research 2005; 15: 698–706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck E., Secker J. Quality criteria for qualitative research: Does context make a difference?. Qualitative Health Research 1999; 9: 552–558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peddie V. L., Bhattacharya S., van Teijlingen E. Decision making in IVF: how women view the end of treatment. Human Fertility 2004; 7: 31–37
   Google Scholar
• Peddie V. L., Bhattacharya S., van Teijlingen E. A qualitative study of women's decision-making at the end of IVF treatment. Human Reproduction 2005; 20: 1944–1951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope C., Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. British Medical Journal 1995; 311: 42–45, 109-12, 182-184, 251-253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie J., Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. Analysing qualitative data, A. Bryman, R. Burgess. Routledge, London 1990; 173–194
   Google Scholar
• Roy Morgan Research. 1997 – 2001, www.roymorgan.com/polls/2001/3421
   Google Scholar
• The Daily Telegraph. The holy grail of stem cell research. Wednesday, 19th January, 2005; 16
   Google Scholar
• Teijlingen van E. R., Ireland J. Research interviews in midwifery. Midwives 2003; 6: 260–263
   Google Scholar
• Teijlingen van E. R., Forrest K. The range of qualitative research methods in family planning and reproductive health care. Journal of Family Planning & Reproductive Health Care 2004; 30: 171–173
   Google Scholar
• Temple B, Young A. Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research 2004; 4: 161–178
   Google Scholar
• Von der Lippe H., Fuhrer U. Where qualitative research meets demography: interdisciplinary explorations. Qualitative Research 2004; 4: 201–226
   Google Scholar
• Walker R. Applied qualitative research. Gower, Aldershot 1985
   Google Scholar
• Williams B. Patient satisfaction: A valid concept?. Social Science & Medicine 1994; 38: 509–516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar