References
- Albar, M.A. (2002). Ethical considerations in the prevention and management of genetic disorders with special emphasis on religious considerations. Saudi Medical Journal, 23, 627–632. Retrieved from http://smj.psmmc.med.sa/index.php/smj/article/view/4083.
- Banks, S., Scully, J., & Shakespeare, T. (2006). Ordinary ethics: Lay people’s deliberations on social sex selection. New Genetics and Society, 25, 289–303. doi:10.1080/14636770601032890.
- Church of England. (1996). Personal origins: The report of a working party on human fertilisation and embryology of the board for social responsibility. Retrieved from https://www.churchofengland.org/media/45709/gamete.pdf.
- Clark, M. (2006). Shiite perspectives on kinship and new reproductive technologies. ISIM Review, 17, 26–27. Retrieved from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/10077.
- Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith. (2008). Instruction Dignitas Personae on Certain Bioethical Questions. Retrieved from http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20081208_dignitas-personae_en.html.
- Culley, L., Hudson, N., & Rapport, F. (2013). Assisted conception and South Asian communities in the UK: Public perceptions of the use of donor gametes in infertility treatment. Human Fertility, 16, 48–53. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2013.773091.
- Day, A. (Ed.) (2008). Religion and the individual: Belief, practice, identity. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Dutney, A. (2007). Religion, infertility and assisted reproductive technology. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 21, 169–180. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.09.007.
- Ford, N. (2008). A Catholic ethical approach to human reproductive technology. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 17, 39–48. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60329-X.
- Gibbs, G. (2002). Qualitative data analysis. Explorations with NVivo. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Hudson, N., Culley, L., Rapport, F., Johnson, M., & Bharadwaj, A. (2009). "Public" perceptions of gamete donation: A research review. Public Understanding of Science, 18, 61–77. doi: 10.1177/0963662507078396.
- Inhorn, M.C. (2006). Making Muslim babies: IVF and gamete donation in Sunni versus Shi'a Islam. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 30, 427–450. doi: 10.1007/s11013-006-9027-x.
- Jafri, H., Ahmed, S., Ahmed, M., Hewison, J., Raashid, Y., & Sheridan, E. (2012). Islam and termination of pregnancy for genetic conditions in Pakistan: Implications for Pakistani health care providers. Prenatal Diagnosis, 32, 1218–1220. doi: 10.1002/pd.3987.
- Lanzone, A. (2013). Ethical issues in human reproduction: Catholic perspectives. Gynecological Endocrinology 29, 953–954. doi:10.3109/09513590.2013.825717.
- Larijani, B., & Zahedi, F. (2008). Ethical and religious aspects of gamete and embryo donation and legislation in Iran. Journal of Religion and Health, 46, 399–408. doi: 10.1007/s10943-007-9108-3.
- Lemons, J., Ragsdale, J., Vaughn, L., & Grossoehme, D. (2012). “I didn’t know it existed before you called”: Protestant clergy experience, education and perceptions regarding genetics. Journal of Genetic Counselling, 22, 226–237. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9538-2.
- Mitchell, L. (1999). Combining focus groups and interviews: Telling it like it is, telling how it feels. In: R.S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 36–46). London; Sage.
- Mitchell, C. (2006). The religious content of ethnic identities. Sociology, 40, 1135–1152. doi: 10.1177/0038038506069854.
- NHS. (2015). What does my religion say? Retrieved from www.organdonation.nhs.uk/about-donation/what-does-my-religion-say/ (accessed 3 October 2015).
- Office for National Statistics. (2012). Religion in England and Wales 2011. Retrieved from http://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/religion/articles/religioninenglandandwales2011/2012-12-11.
- PEALS. (2014). Faithful judgements: The role of religion in laypeople's ethical evaluations of new reproductive and genetic technologies. Retrieved from www.ncl.ac.uk/peals/research/project/3979 (accessed 3 October 2015).
- Purewal, S., & van den Akker, O.B.A. (2006). British women’s attitudes towards oocytes donation: Ethnic differences and altruism. Patient Education and Counselling, 64, 43–49. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.007.
- Rozario, S. (2005). Genetics, religion and identity among British Bangladeshis: Some findings. Diversity in Health and Social Care, 2, 187–196. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233578327_Genetics_religion_and_identity_among_British_Bangladeshis_some_initial_findings.
- Scully, J.L., Banks, S., & Shakespeare, T. (2006). Chance, choice and control: Lay debate on prenatal social sex selection. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 21–31. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.12.013.
- Scully, J.L., Shakespeare, T., & Banks, S. (2006). Gift not commodity? Lay people deliberating social sex selection. Sociology of Health & Illness, 28, 749–767. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00540.x.
- Serour, G.I. (2013). Ethical issues in human reproduction: Islamic perspectives. Gynecological Endocrinology, 29, 949–952. doi:10.3109/09513590.2013.825714.
- Shaw, A. (2012). ‘They say Islam has a solution for everything, so why are there no guidelines for this?' Ethical dilemmas associated with the births and deaths of infants with fatal abnormalities from a small sample of Pakistani Muslim couples in Britain. Bioethics, 26, 485–492. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01883.x.
- Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Tipton, S.M. (1982). Getting saved from the sixties: Moral meaning in conversion and cultural change. Berkeley: University of California Press.