Time lapse imaging: is it time to incorporate this technology into routine clinical practice?

References

• Aguilar, J., Motato, Y., Escribá, M.J., Ojeda, M., Muñoz, E., & Meseguer, M. (2014). The human first cell cycle: impact on implantation. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 28, 475–484. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.11.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, S., Arroll, N., Cree, L.M., Jordan, V., & Farquhar, C. (2015). Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD011320. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011320.pub2.
   Google Scholar
• Azzarello, A., Hoest, T., & Mikkelsen, A.L. (2012). The impact of pronuclei morphology and dynamicity on live birth outcome after time-lapse culture. Human Reproduction, 27, 2649–2657. doi:10.1093/humrep/des210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie, A., Homburg, R., McDowell, G., Brown, J., Kingsland, C., & Troup, S. (2016). Embryos cultured in a time-lapse system result in superior treatment outcomes: a strict matched pair analysis. Human Fertility, Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/14647273.2016.1258735.
   Google Scholar
• Basile, N., Morbeck, D., Garcia-Velasco, J., Bronet, F., & Meseguer, M. (2013). Type of culture media does not affect embryo kinetics: a time-lapse analysis of sibling oocytes. Human Reproduction, 28, 634–641. doi:10.1093/humrep/des462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brison, D.R., Roberts, S.A., & Kimber, S.J. (2013). How should we assess the safety of IVF technologies?. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 27, 710–721. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., Fishel, S., Duffy, S., Bowman, N., Sedler, M., & Thornton, S. (2013). Retrospective analysis of outcome after IVF using an aneuploidy risk model derived from time-lapse imaging without PGS. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 27, 140–146. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.04.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamayou, S., Patrizio, P., Storaci, G., Tomaselli, V., Alecci, C., Ragolia, C., … Gugliemino, A. (2013). The use of morphokinetic parameters to select all embryos with full capacity to implant. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 30, 703–710. doi:10.1007/s10815-013-9992-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavez, S.L., Loewke, K.E., Han, J., Moussavi, F., Colls, P., Munne, S., … Reijo Pera, R.A. (2012). Dynamic blastomere behaviour reflects human embryo ploidy by the four-cell stage. Nature Communications, 13, 1251. doi:10.1038/ncomms2249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla, M., Fakih, M., Shunnar, A., Bayram, A., Hellani, A., Perumal, V., … Budak, E. (2015). Morphokinetic analysis of cleavage stage embryos and its relationship to aneuploidy in a retrospective time-lapse imaging study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 32, 69–75. doi:10.1007/s10815-014-0372-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, M., Gadea, B., Garrido, N., Pedersen, K., Martinez, M., Perez-Cano, I., … Meseguer, M. (2011). Embryo quality, blastocyst and ongoing pregnancy rates in oocyte donation patients whose embryos were monitored by time-lapse imaging. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 28, 569–573. doi:10.1007/s10815-011-9549-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Mouzon, J., Goossens, V., Bhattacharya, S., Castilla, J.A., Ferraretti, A.P., Korsak, V., … Nyboe Andersen, A. The European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). (2010). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Human Reproduction, 25, 1851–1862. doi:10.1093/humrep/deq124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragouli, E., & Wells, D. (2011). Aneuploidy in the human blastocyst. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 133, 149–159. doi:10.1159/000323500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara, M., Takahashi, K., Izuno, M., Duan, Y.R., Kazono, M., Kimura, F., & Noda, Y. (2007). Effect of micro-environment maintenance on embryo culture after in-vitro fertilization: comparison of top-load mini incubator and conventional front-load incubator. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 24, 5–9. doi:10.1007/s10815-006-9088-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, L.R., Goldberg, J., Falcone, T., Austin, C., & Desai, N. (2016). Does the addition of time-lapse morphokinetics in the selection of embryos for transfer improve pregnancy rates? A randomized controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility, 105, 275–285. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, J., Magli, M.C., Lundin, K., Barratt, C.L., & Brison, D. (2011). When and how should new technology be introduced into the IVF laboratory? Human Reproduction, 27, 303–313. doi:10.1093/humrep/der414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heneghan, C., Spencer, E.A., Bobrovitz, N., Collins, D.R., Nunan, D., Plüddemann, A., … Mahtani, K.R. (2016). Lack of evidence for interventions offered in UK fertility centres. British Medical Journal, 355, i6295. doi:10.1136/bmj.i6295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herrero, J., Tejera, A., Albert, C., Vidal, C., de los Santos, M.J., & Meseguer, M. (2013). A time to look back: analysis of morphokinetic characteristics of human embryo development. Fertility and Sterility, 100, 1602–1609. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2016). Fertility Treatment 2014: trends and figures. March 2016. Retrieved from http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/HFEA_Fertility_treatment_Trends_and_figures_2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, Y.G., Kofinas, J.D., Melzer, K., Noyes, N., McCaffrey, C., Buldo-Licciardi, J., … Grifo, J.A. (2014). Assessing morphokinetic parameters via time lapse microscopy (TLM) to predict euploidy: are aneuploidy risk classification models universal?. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 31, 1231–1242. doi:10.1007/s10815-014-0285-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, S., Cetinkaya, M., Pirkevi, C., Yelke, H., & Kumtepe, Y. (2013). Comparison of blastocyst development and cycle outcome in patients with eSET using either conventional or time lapse incubators. A prospective study of good prognosis patients. Journal of Reproductive and Stem Cell Biotechnology, 3, 55–61. Retrieved from http://www.ivf-hub.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&id=13&Itemid=87.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard, K., Hindkjaer, J.J., & Ingerslev, H.J. (2012). Human embryonic development after blastomere removal: a time-lapse analysis. Human Reproduction, 27, 97–105. doi:10.1093/humrep/der382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs, P., Matyas, S., Forgacs, V., Sajgo, A., Rarosi, F., & Pribenszky, C. (2013). Time-lapse embryo selection for single blastocyst transfer - results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized clinical trial. Fertility and Sterility, 100, S90., doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1736.
   Google Scholar
• Kuliev, A., Zlatopolsky, Z., Kirillova, I., Spivakova, J., & Cieslak Janzen, J. (2011). Meiosis errors in over 20,000 oocytes studied in the practice of preimplantation aneuploidy testing. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 22, 2–8. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.08.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmen, J.G., Agerholm, I., & Ziebe, S. (2008). Kinetic markers of human embryo quality using time-lapse recordings of IVF/ICSI-fertilized oocytes. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 17, 385–391. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60222-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meseguer, M., Herrero, J., Tejera, A., Hilligsøe, K.M., Ramsing, N.B., & Remohí, J. (2011). The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Human Reproduction, 26, 2658–2671. doi:10.1093/humrep/der256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meseguer, M., Rubio, I., Cruz, M., Basile, N., Marcos, J., & Requena, A. (2012). Embryo incubation and selection in a time-lapse monitoring system improves pregnancy outcome compared with a standard incubator: a retrospective cohort study. Fertility and Sterility, 98, 1481–1489. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2013). NICE Clinical Guideline 156. Fertility assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. Retrieved from https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156/resources/guidance-fertility-pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nakahara, T., Iwase, A., Goto, M., Harata, T., Suzuki, M., Ienaga, M., … Ando, H. (2010). Evaluation of the safety of time-lapse observations for human embryos. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 27, 93–96. doi:10.1007/s10815-010-9385-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Bergh, C., Selleskog, U., Thurin-Kjellberg, A., & Lundin, K. (2015). No benefit of culturing embryos in a closed system compared with a conventional incubator in terms of number of good quality embryos: results from an RCT. Human Reproduction, 30, 268–275. doi:10.1093/humrep/deu316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, D., Flaherty, S.P., Barry, M.F., & Matthews, C.D. (1997). Preliminary observations on polar body extrusion and pronuclear formation in human oocytes using time-lapse video cinematography. Human Reproduction, 12, 532–541. doi:10.1093/humrep/12.3.532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pribenszky, C., Mátyás, S., Kovács, P., Losonczi, E., Zádori, J., & Vajta, G. (2010). Pregnancy achieved by transfer of a single blastocyst selected by time-lapse monitoring. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 21, 533–536. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.04.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rienzi, L., Capalbo, A., Stoppa, M., Romano, S., Maggiulli, R., Albricci, L., … Ubaldi, F.M. (2015). No evidence of association between blastocyst aneuploidy and morphokinetic assessment in a selected population of poor-prognosis patients: a longitudinal cohort study. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 30, 57–66. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio, I., Galan, A., Larreategui, Z., Ayerdi, F., Bellver, J., Herrero, J., & Meseguer, M. (2014). Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope. Fertility and Sterility, 102, 1287–1294. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, E.A., Mahtani, K.R., Goldacre, B., & Heneghan, C. (2016). Claims for fertility interventions: a systematic assessment of statements on UK fertility centre websites. British Medical Journal Open, 6, e013940. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013940.
   Google Scholar
• Stecher, A., Vanderzwalmen, P., Zintz, M., Wirleitner, B., Schuff, M., Spitzer, D., & Zech, N.H. (2014). Transfer of blastocysts with deviant morphological and morphokinetic parameters at early stages of in-vitro development: a case series. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 28, 424–435. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.12.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, C., Loewke, K.E., Bossert, N.L., Behr, B., De Jong, C.J., Baer, T.M., & Reijo Pera, R.A. (2010). Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage. Nature Biotechnology, 28, 1115–1124. doi:10.1038/nbt.1686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar