Publication Cover
Human Fertility
an international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice
Volume 23, 2020 - Issue 1
229
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Influence of body mass index on the relationship between endometrial thickness and pregnancy outcome in single blastocyst frozen embryo transfer cycles

, , , &
Pages 32-37 | Received 16 Oct 2017, Accepted 10 Jul 2018, Published online: 17 Sep 2018

References

  • Aflatoonian, A., Mansoori Moghaddam, F., Mashayekhy, M., & Mohamadian, F. (2010). Comparison of early pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen and fresh embryo transfer in ART cycles. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 27, 695–700. doi: 10.1007/s10815-010-9470-z.
  • Ashrafi, M., Jahangiri, N., Hassani, F., Akhoond, M.R., & Madani, T. (2011). The factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle. Taiwan Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 50, 159–164. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2011.01.037.
  • Bu, Z., Wang, K., Dai, W., & Sun, Y. (2016). Endometrial thickness significantly affects clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Gynecological Endocrinology, 32, 524–528. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1136616.
  • Check, J.H., Dietterich, C., Graziano, V., Lurie, D., & Choe, J.K. (2004). Effect of maximal endometrial thickness on outcome after frozen embryo transfer. Fertility and Sterility, 81, 1399–1400. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.01.020.
  • de Ziegler, D., Cornel, C., Bergeron, C., Hazout, A., Bouchard, P., & Frydman, R. (1991). Controlled preparation of the endometrium with exogenous estradiol and progesterone in women having functioning ovaries. Fertility and Sterility, 56, 851–855. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54654-8.
  • Dessolle, L., Daraï, E., Cornet, D., Rouzier, R., Coutant, C., Mandelbaum, J., & Antoine, J.M. (2009). Determinants of pregnancy rate in the donor oocyte model: A multivariate analysis of 450 frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Human Reproduction, 24, 3082–3089. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep303.
  • Dyer, S., Chambers, G.M., de Mouzon, J., Nygren, K.G., Zegers-Hochschild, F., Mansour, R., … Adamson, G.D. (2016). International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies world report: Assisted reproductive technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. Human Reproduction, 31, 1588–1609. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew082.
  • El-Toukhy, T., Coomarasamy, A., Khairy, M., Sunkara, K., Seed, P., Khalaf, Y., & Braude, P. (2008). The relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of medicated frozen embryo replacement cycles. Fertility and Sterility, 89, 832–839. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.031.
  • Evans, J., Hannan, N.J., Edgell, T.A., Vollenhoven, B.J., Lutjen, P.J., Osianlis, T., … Rombauts, L.J.F. (2014). Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: Backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. Human Reproduction Update, 20, 808–821. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu027.
  • Ghobara, T., & Vandekerckhove, P. (2008). Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 23, CD003414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003414.pub3.
  • Gingold, J.A., Lee, J.A., Rodriguez-Purata, J., Whitehouse, M.C., Sandler, B., Grunfeld, L., … Copperman, A.B. (2015). Endometrial pattern, but not endometrial thickness, affects implantation rates in euploid embryo transfers. Fertility and Sterility, 104, 620–628. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.036.
  • Gleicher, N., Kushnir, V.A., & Barad, D.H. (2014). Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) still in search of a clinical application: A systematic review. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 12, 22–22. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-22.
  • Grunfeld, L., Walker, B., Bergh, P.A., Sandler, B., Hofmann, G., & Navot, D. (1991). High-resolution endovaginal ultrasonography of the endometrium: A noninvasive test for endometrial adequacy. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 78, 200–204. Retrieved from: https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Citation/1991/08000/High_Resolution_Endovaginal_Ultrasonography_of_the.8.aspx' to reference as in original manuscript.
  • Kasius, A., Smit, J.G., Torrance, H.L., Eijkemans, M.J., Mol, B.W., Opmeer, B.C., & Broekmans, F.J. (2014). Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update, 20, 530–541. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu011.
  • Kava-Braverman, A., Martínez, F., Rodríguez, I., Álvarez, M., Barri, P.N., & Coroleu, B. (2017). What is a difficult transfer? Analysis of 7,714 embryo transfers: The impact of maneuvers during embryo transfers on pregnancy rate and a proposal of objective assessment. Fertility and Sterility, 107, 657–663. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.11.020.
  • Noyes, N., Hampton, B.S., Berkeley, A., Licciardi, F., Grifo, J., & Krey, L. (2001). Factors useful in predicting the success of oocyte donation: A 3-year retrospective analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 76, 92–97. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01823-4.
  • Provost, M.P., Acharya, K.S., Acharya, C.R., Yeh, J.S., Steward, R.G., Eaton, J.L., … Muasher, S.J. (2016). Pregnancy outcomes decline with increasing body mass index: Analysis of 239,127 fresh autologous in vitro fertilization cycles from the 2008–2010 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertility and Sterility, 105, 663–669. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.008.
  • Roque, M., Lattes, K., Serra, S., Solà, I., Geber, S., Carreras, R., & Checa, M.A. (2013). Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 99, 156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.003.
  • Salumets, A., Suikkari, A.M., Mäkinen, S., Karro, H., Roos, A., & Tuuri, T. (2006). Frozen embryo transfers: Implications of clinical and embryological factors on the pregnancy outcome. Human Reproduction, 21, 2368–2374. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del151.
  • Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G.D., Dyer, S., Racowsky, C., de Mouzon, J., Sokol, R., … van der Poel, S. (2017). The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Fertility and Sterility, 108, 393–406. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.