References
- Blake, L., Carone, N., Slutsky, J., Raffanello, E., Ehrhardt, A.A., & Golombok, S. (2016). Gay father surrogacy families: Relationships with surrogates and egg donors and parental disclosure of children’s origins. Fertility and Sterility, 106, 1503–1509. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.013.
- Blyth, E. (2010). Fertility patients’ experiences of cross border reproductive care. Fertility and Sterility, 94, e11–e15. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.046.
- Braverman, A., Casey, P., & Jadva, V. (2012). Reproduction through surrogacy: The UK and US experience. In M. Richards G, . Pennings, & J.B. Appleby (Eds.), Reproductive donation: Practice, policy and bioethics (pp. 289–307). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139026390.016.
- Crawshaw, M., Blyth, E., & van den Akker, O. (2012). The changing profile of surrogacy in the UK –Implications for national and international policy and practice. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 34, 267–277. doi: 10.1080/09649069.2012.750478.
- Culley, L., Hudson, N., Rapport, F., Blyth, E., Norton, W., & Pacey, A.A. (2011). Crossing borders for fertility treatment: motivations, destinations and outcomes of UK fertility travellers. Human Reproduction, 26, 2373–2381. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der191.
- Deomampo, D. (2015). Defining parents, making citizens: Nationality and citizenship in transnational surrogacy. Medical Anthropology, 34, 210–225. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2014.890195.
- Ferraretti, A.P., Pennings, G., Gianaroli, L., Natali, F., & Magli, M.C. (2010). Cross-border reproductive care: A phenomenon expressing the controversial aspects of reproductive technologies. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 20, 261–266. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.009.
- Fronek, P. (2018). Current perspectives on the ethics of selling international surrogacy support services. Medicolegal and Bioethics, 8, 11–20. doi: 10.2147/MB.S134090.
- Gamble, N. (2012). Made in the U.S.A.: Representing U.K. parents conceiving through surrogacy and ART in the United States. Family Law Quarterly, 46, 155–168.
- Gamble, N. (2016). A better legal framework for United Kingdom surrogacy? In S. Golombok R, Scott, J.B. Appleby, M. Richards, & S. Wilkinson, S. (Eds.), Regulating reproductive donation (pp. 140–162). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316117446.008.
- Hewson, C. (2014). Qualitative approaches in Internet-mediated research: Opportunities, issues, possibilities. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 423–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.013.020.
- Hudson, N., Culley, L., Blyth, E., Norton, W., Rapport, F., & Pacey, A. (2011). Cross-border reproductive care: A review of the literature. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 22, 673–685. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.03.010.
- Jackson, E. (2016). UK law and international commercial surrogacy: 'The very antithesis of sensible'. Journal of Medical Law and Ethics, 4, 197–214. doi: 10.7590/221354016X14803383336806..
- Jackson, E., Millbank, J., Karpin, I., & Stuhmcke, A. (2017). Learning from cross-border reproduction. Medical Law Review, 25, 23–46. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fww045.
- Jadva, V., Blake, L., Casey, P., & Golombok, S. (2012). Surrogacy families 10 years on: Relationship with the surrogate, decisions over disclosure and children's understanding of their surrogacy origins. Human Reproduction, 27, 3008–3014. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des273.
- Nulty, D.D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 301–314. doi: 10.1080/02602930701293231.
- Palattiyil, G., Blyth, E., Sidhva, D., & Balakrishnan, G. (2010). Globalization and cross-border reproductive services: Ethical implications of surrogacy in India for social work. International Social Work, 53, 686–700. doi: 10.1177/0020872810372157..
- Pennings, G., de Wert, G., Shenfield, F., Cohen, J., Tarlatzis, B., & Devroey, P. (2008). ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 15: Cross-border reproductive care. Human Reproduction, 23, 2182–2184. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den184.
- Perkins, K.M., Boulet, S.L., Jamieson, D.J., & Kissin, D.M.; National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System (NASS) Group. (2016). Trends and outcomes of gestational surrogacy in the United States. Fertility and Sterility, 106, 435–442. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.050.
- Prosser, H., & Gamble, N. (2016). Modern surrogacy practice and the need for reform. Journal of Medical Law and Ethics, 4, 257–274. doi: 10.7590/221354016X14803383336842.
- Ruiz-Robledillo, N., & Moya-Albiol, L. (2016). Gestational surrogacy: Psychosocial aspects [Gestación subrogada: aspectos psicosociales]. Psychosocial Intervention, 25, 187–193. doi: 10.1016/j.psi.2016.05.001.
- Söderström-Anttila, V., Wennerholm, U.B., Loft, A., Pinborg, A., Aittomäki, K., Romundstad, L.B., & Bergh, C. (2016). Surrogacy: Outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families—A systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 22, 260–276. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv046.
- Surrogacy UK. (2015). Surrogacy in the UK: Myth busting and reform. Retrieved from https://www.familylaw.co.uk/system/froala_assets/documents/27/Surrogacy_in_the_UK_report.pdf
- The Guardian. (2015). https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/may/18/unregistered-surrogate-born-children-creating-legal-timebomb-judge-warns.
- Zadeh, S., Ilioi, E.C., Jadva, V., & Golombok, S. (2018). The perspectives of adolescents conceived using surrogacy, egg or sperm donation. Human Reproduction, 33, 1099–1106. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey088.