Providers’ attitudes towards payment to egg donors: an international survey

References

• Ben-Rafael, Z. (2018). The dilemma of social oocyte freezing: Usage rate is too low to make it cost-effective. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 37(4), 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.06.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakemore, J. K., Voigt, P., Schiffman, M. R., Lee, S., Besser, A. G., & Fino, M. E. (2019). Experiences and psychological outcomes of the oocyte donor: A survey of donors post-donation from one center. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 36(10), 1999–2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01527-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutelle, A. L. (2014). Donor motivations, associated risks and ethical considerations of oocyte donation. Nursing for Women’s Health, 18(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-486x.12107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bracewell-Milnes, T., Rajendran, S., Saso, S., Jones, B., Platts, S., Cato, S., & Thum, M. Y. (2019). Investigating knowledge and perceptions of egg sharing among healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 236, 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracewell-Milnes, T., Saso, S., Bora, S., Ismail, A. M., Al-Memar, M., Hamed, A. H., Abdalla, H., & Thum, M. Y. (2016). Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: A systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 22(4), 450–465. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmw006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, I. G. (2015). Complexifying Commodification, Consumption, ART, and Abortion. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics : A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43(2), 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combs, A., Kimes, M. J., Jaslow, C. R., Hayes, H., O'Leary, L. B., Levy, M. J., & Kutteh, W. H. (2022). Perception of pain and the oocyte donor experience: A retrospective analysis of commercial US donors. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 45(5), 906–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creux, H., Diaz, M., Grynberg, M., Papaxanthos-Roche, A., Chansel-Debordeaux, L., Jimenez, C., Frantz, S., Chevalier, N., Takefman, J., & Hocké, C. (2020). National survey on the opinions of French specialists in assisted reproductive technologies about social issues impacting the future revision of the French Bioethics laws. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction, 49(9), 101902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erin, C. A., & Harris, J. (2003). An ethical market in human organs. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(3), 137–138. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.29.3.137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2022). Cross-border reproductive care: An Ethics Committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 117(5), 954–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2021). Financial compensation of oocyte donors: An Ethics Committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 116(2), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM)‡ for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), Wyns, C., Bergh, C., Calhaz-Jorge, C., De Geyter, C., Kupka, M. S., Motrenko, T., Rugescu, I., Smeenk, J., Tandler-Schneider, A., Vidakovic, S., & Goossens, V. (2020). ART in Europe, 2016: results generated from European registries by ESHRE. Human Reproduction Open, 2020(3), hoaa032. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa032
   Google Scholar
• Gianaroli, L., Ferraretti, A. P., Magli, M. C., & Sgargi, S. (2016). Current regulatory arrangements for assisted conception treatment in European countries. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 207, 211–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Arribas, E., Blockeel, C., Pennings, G., Nekkebroeck, J., Velasco, J. A. G., Serna, J., & De Vos, M. (2022). Oocyte vitrification for elective fertility preservation: A SWOT analysis. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 44(6), 1005–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedeke, S., Gamble, H., & Thurlow, R. (2023). Motivations for egg donation to previously unknown recipients: Donation as a personal, relational act of giving. Human Fertility (Cambridge, England), 26(2), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.2005263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groll, D. (2021). Well-being, gamete donation, and genetic knowledge: The significant interest view. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 46(6), 758–781. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhab027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunning, J. (2001). Regulating assisted reproduction technologies. Medicine and Law, 20(3), 425–433.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammarberg, K., Johnson, L., & Petrillo, T. (2011). Gamete and embryo donation and surrogacy in australia: The social context and regulatory framework. International Journal of Fertility & Sterility, 4(4), 176–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heng, B. C. (2006). Advances in oocyte cryopreservation technology will eventually blur the ethical and moral boundaries between compensated egg sharing and commercialized oocyte donation. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 12(3), 280–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60996-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibino, Y., & Shimazono, Y. (2014). Impact of egg donation deliveries from domestic and overseas sources on maternal care: A questionnaire survey of Japanese perinatal physicians. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 19(4), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-014-0389-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homburg, R., Husain, F., Gudi, A., Brincat, M., & Shah, A. (2018). Religious attitudes to gamete donation. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 231, 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IVF-Worldwide.com. (2023). Should egg donors get paid? An international survey of fertility professionals. https://ivf-worldwide.com/survey/should-egg-donors-get-paid-an-international-survey-of-fertility-professionals.html
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, E., Millbank, J., Karpin, I., & Stuhmcke, A. (2017). Learning from Cross-Border Reproduction. Medical Law Review, 25(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fww045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, M., Fuscaldo, G., Gwini, S. M., Catt, S., & Richings, N. M. (2022). Financing future fertility: Women’s views on funding egg freezing. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 14, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.07.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kenney, N., & McGowan, M. (2014). Egg donation compensation: Ethical and legal challenges. Medicolegal and Bioethics, 4, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.2147/MB.S51328
   Google Scholar
• Khalili, M. A., Isikoglu, M., Tabibnejad, N., Ahmadi, M., Abed, F., Parsanejad, M. E., Ghasemi, M., & el Jamal, H. (2008). IVF staff attitudes towards oocyte donation: A multi-centric study from Iran and Turkey. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 17(Suppl 3), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60333-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klüber, C. M., Greene, B. H., Wagner, U., & Ziller, V. (2020). Cost-effectiveness of social oocyte freezing in Germany: Estimates based on a Markov model. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 301(3), 823–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05449-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kool, E. M., Bos, A. M. E., van der Graaf, R., Fauser, B., & Bredenoord, A. L. (2018). Ethics of oocyte banking for third-party assisted reproduction: A systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 24(5), 615–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmy016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kool, E. M., van der Graaf, R., Bos, A. M. E., Pieters, J., Custers, I. M., Fauser, B., & Bredenoord, A. L. (2019). Stakeholders views on the ethical aspects of oocyte banking for third-party assisted reproduction: A qualitative interview study with donors, recipients and professionals. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 34(5), 842–850. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, L., Ros, S. T., Hollond, C., Stofan, J., & Quinn, G. P. (2022). Patient and clinician experiences with cross-border reproductive care: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 105(7), 1943–1952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millbank, J. (2019). What is the responsibility of Australian medical professionals whose patients travel abroad for assisted reproduction? Medical Law Review, 27(3), 365–389. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwy040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrachi, Y., Shoham, G., Leong, M., Sagiv, R., Horowitz, E., Raziel, A., & Weissman, A. (2021). Misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy loss: An international survey. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 42(5), 997–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neri, M., Turillazzi, E., Pascale, N., Riezzo, I., & Pomara, C. (2016). Egg production and donation: A new frontier in the global landscape of cross-border reproductive care: Ethical concerns. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 17(4), 316–320. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389201017666160118103418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J. E., Paul, R. C., & Chambers, G. M. (2022). Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand 2020. National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, the University of New South Wales, Sydney. https://npesu.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/npesu/data_collection/Assisted%20Reproductive%20Technology%20in%20Australia%20and%20New%20Zealand%202020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Papadimos, T. J., & Papadimos, A. T. (2004). The student and the ovum: The lack of autonomy and informed consent in trading genes for tuition. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 2(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-2-56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pennings, G. (2009). International evolution of legislation and guidelines in medically assisted reproduction. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 18(Suppl 2), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60443-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pennings, G. (2023). When elective egg freezers become egg donors: Practical and ethical issues. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 47(1), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.03.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyakov, A., & Rozen, G. (2021). Social egg freezing and donation: Waste not, want not. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(12), e73. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romeo Casabona, C. M., Paslack, R., & Simon, J. W. (2013). Reproductive medicine and the law: Egg donation in Germany, Spain and other European countries. Revista De Derecho y Genoma Humano = Law and the Human Genome Review, 38(38), 15–42.
   Google Scholar
• Rybak, A. (2023). Survey mode and nonresponse bias: A meta-analysis based on the data from the international social survey programme waves 1996-2018 and the European social survey rounds 1 to 9. PLoS One, 18(3), e0283092. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salama, M., Isachenko, V., Isachenko, E., Rahimi, G., Mallmann, P., Westphal, L. M., Inhorn, M. C., & Patrizio, P. (2018). Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): A growing global phenomenon with multidimensional implications (a systematic and critical review). Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 35(7), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1181-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallam, H. N., & Sallam, N. H. (2016). Religious aspects of assisted reproduction. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 8(1), 33–48. https://fvvo.eu/archive/volume-8/number-1/facts/religious-aspects-of-assisted-reproduction/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheehan, K. B. (2006). E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(2), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00117.x
   Google Scholar
• Shoham, G., Alexandroni, H., Leong, M., Shulman, A., & Weissman, A. (2022). Use of endometrial scratching in IVF/IUI – A worldwide opinion and clinical practice survey. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 49(5), 108. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog4905108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaldar, D. (2020). Egg donors’ motivations, experiences, and opinions: A survey of egg donors in South Africa. PloS One, 15(1), e0226603. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, K. J., Shoham, G., Christianson, M. S., Zhao, Y., Leong, M., & Shoham, Z. (2015). Use of anti-mullerian hormone for testing ovarian reserve: A survey of 796 infertility clinics worldwide. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 32(10), 1441–1448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0562-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman, A., Shoham, G., Shoham, Z., Fishel, S., Leong, M., & Yaron, Y. (2017). Preimplantation genetic screening: Results of a worldwide web-based survey. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 35(6), 693–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, I. J., Wu, M. Y., Chao, K. H., Wei, S. Y., Tsai, Y. Y., Huang, T. C., Chen, M. J., & Chen, S. U. (2022). Usage and cost-effectiveness of elective oocyte freezing: A retrospective observational study. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 20(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00996-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar