Conceptions of justice in the planning of the new urban landscape – Recent changes in the comprehensive planning discourse in Malmö, Sweden

References

• Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning re-examined. Environment Planning B: Planning Design, 31, 743–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecthts, L. (2011). Transformative practices, where strategic spatial planning meets social innovation. In StijnOosterlynck, J.van den Broeck, L.Albrechts, F.Moulaert, & A.Verhetsel (Eds.), Strategic spatial projects, catalysts for change (pp. 17–25). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anderberg, S., & Clark, E. (2009). Green and sustainable Öresund region – Or eco-branding Copenhagen and Malmö? In IvanVojnovic (Ed.), Sustainability: A global urban context. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, R. (2006). ‘Breaking segregation’ – Rhetorical construct or effective policy? The case of the metropolitan development initiative in Sweden. Urban Studies, 43, 787–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, R., Bråmå, Å., & Hogdal, J. (2007). Segregationens dynamik och planeringens möjligheter [Dynamics of segregation and the possibilities of planning]. Malmö: Malmö stad.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, R., Magnusson Turner, L., & Holmqvist, E. (2010). Contextualising ethnic residential segregation in Sweden: Welfare, housing and migration-related policies. Uppsala: Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
   Google Scholar
• Baeten, G. (2012). Normalising neoliberal planning: The case of Malmö, Sweden. In TunaTasan-Kok & GuyBaeten (Eds.), Contradictions of neoliberal planning, cities, policies and politics (pp. 21–42). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Behtoui, A. (2004). Unequal opportunities for young people with immigrant backgrounds in the Swedish labour market. Labour, 18, 633–660.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2006). Just planning: The art of situated ethical judgment. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26, 92–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (2000). Public involvement and planning: Looking beyond the one to the many. International Planning Studies, 5, 321–344.
   Google Scholar
• Cronquist, I. (2012). Medborgardeltagande i översiktsplaneringen – en analys av Malmö Stads samråd med utgångspunkt från FNs Habitatagenda [Citizen participation in comprehensive planning, an analysis of consultations in the city of Malmö, in the perspective of UNs Habitat agenda]. Alnarp: Magisteravhandling SLU Alnarp.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstedt, I., & Bevelander, P. (2010). General versus vocational education and employment integration of immigrants in Sweden. Journal of Immigrant Refugee Studies, 8, 158–192.
   Google Scholar
• Dannestam, T. (2008). Rethinking local politics: Towards a cultural political economy of entrepreneurial cities. Space and Polity, 12, 353–372.
   Google Scholar
• Dannestam, T. (2009). Stadspolitik i Malmö, politikens meningsskapande och materialitet [Local urban policy in Malmö, towards a discursive-material analysis of politics]. Lund: Lunds Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31, 544–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz, J. A. (2005). Allmänhetens attityder till rasism, främlingsfientlighet, islamofobi och anti-semitism [Public attitudes towards racism, xenophobic-, Islamophobic- and Semitic attitudes]. I: Integrationsverkets rapportserie 2005:2. Rasism och främlingsfientlighet i Sverige (pp. 33–77). Norrköping: Integrationsverket.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, D., & Parutis, V. (2012). ‘Faith in the system?’ State-funded faith schools in England and the contested parameters of community cohesion. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (2000). New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35, 544–555.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., & Iveson, K. (2008). Planning and diversity in the city, redistribution, recognition and encounter. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In CraigCalhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109–142). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, C. (2011). Planning in the “new reality” – Strategic elements and approaches in Swedish municipalities. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Glick Schiller, N., & Çağlar, A. (Eds.). (2011). Locating migration, rescaling cities and migrants. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative actionVol 1. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative actionVol 2. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (2008 [2005]). Between naturalism and religion. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Reijndorp, A. (2001). In search of a new public domain. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, Sept 2008, 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, D. (1997). The power of place. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006). Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning1. European Planning Studies, 14, 525–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hedin, K., Clark, E., Lundholm, E., & Malmberg, G. (2012). Neoliberalization of housing in Sweden: Gentrification, filtering, and social polarization. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102, 443–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Integrationsverket. (2002). På rätt väg? Slutrapport från den nationella utvärderingen av storstadssatsningen [On the right track? Final report from the national evaluation of the Metropolitan Development Initiative]. Norrköping: Integrationsverkets rapportserie 2002:05.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. (1998). Mapping social cohesion, the state of Canadian research. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks. study No. F, 03.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2004). Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy. Critical Discourse Studies, 1, 159–174.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, M., & Khakee, A. (2008). Etik i stadsplanering [Ethics in urban planning]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Kärrholm, M., & Nylund, K. (2011). Escalating consumption and spatial planning: Notes on the evolution of Swedish retail spaces. European Planning Studies, 19, 1043–1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, G. (2005). Islamofobi i Sverige 2004. I: Integrationsverkets rapportserie 2005:2. Rasism och främlingsfientlighet i Sverige (pp. 78–119). Norrköping: Integrationsverket.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, G. (2007). Muslims in the EU: Cities report, Sweden. Open Society Institute, EU Monitoring and Advocacy Program.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1967). The right to the city. In E.Kofman & E.Lebas (Eds.), Writings on cities (pp. 63–184). London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1998). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Listerborn, C. (2007). Who speaks? And who listens? The relationship between planners and women's participation in local planning in a multi-cultural urban environment. GeoJournal, 70, 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P. (2012). Whose right(s) to what city? In N.Brenner, P.Marcuse, & M.Mayer (Eds.), Cities for people, not for profit – Critical urban theory and the right to the city (pp. 24–41). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGhee, D. (2003). Moving to “our” common ground – A critical examination of community cohesion discourse in twenty-first century Britain. Sociological Review, 51, 376–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. (2000). Place and cultural identity in the segregated city. Finnish Journal of Urban Studies, 33, 8–27.
   Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. (2004). Segregation and governance: Transboundary planning initiatives in Swedish outskirts. In MalachyMcEldowney (Ed.), European cities. Insights on outskirts, governance (pp. 115–137). Brussels: COST Office.
   Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. (2007). De religiösa samfundens betydelse som mötesplatser för människor i förskingringen [The importance of religious communities as meeting places for people in the Diaspora]. In K.Nylund (Ed.), Periferin i Centrum, gränsöverskridande praktiker i Stockholms offentliga rum [Periphery under scrutiny, on transgressive practices in the outskirts of Stockholm]. (pp. 333–383). Göteborg: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Economic survey of Sweden 2011. Economic Surveys and Country Surveillance.
   Google Scholar
• Otterbeck, J., & Bevelander, P. (2007). Islamofobi- En studie av begreppet, ungdomars attityder och unga muslimers utsatthet [Islamophobia - a study of the concept, attitudes among young people and the vulnerability of young Muslims in Stockholm]. Stockholm: Forum för levande historia.
   Google Scholar
• Perbo, U. (1999). Varför fick Sverige en depression i början på 1990-talet? [Why did Sweden get a depression in the beginning of the 1990s?]Ekonomisk Debatt, 27, 325–333.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Raco, M., & Flint, J. (2012). Introduction: Characterising the “new” politics of sustainability: From managing growth to coping with crisis. In JohnFlint & MikeRaco (Eds.), The future of sustainable cities (pp. 3–27). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salonen, T. (2012). Befolkningsrörelser, försörjningsvillkor och bostadssegregation – En sociodynamisk analys av Malmö [Population movements, earning conditions and housing segregation, a socio-dynamic analysis of Malmö]. Malmö: Malmö stad.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (1998). Towards cosmopolis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schierup, C-U. (2006). Den sociala exkluderingen i Sverige, migration, arbetsmarknad och välfärdsstat i förändring. In Paulinade los Reyes (Ed.), Arbetslivets (o)synliga murar (pp. 35–99). Stockholm: SOU 2006:59.
   Google Scholar
• Sixtensson, J. (2009). Hemma och främmande i staden, kvinnor med slöja berättar [Being at home, but still a stranger in the city, women with veils narrate]. Malmö: Malmö högskola.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar