Limits and potentials to deliberative engagement in highly regulated planning systems: Norm development within fixed rules

References

• Brownill, S., & Carpenter, J. (2007). Participation and planning: Dichotomies, rationalities and strategies for power. Town Planning Review, 78, 401–428.
   Google Scholar
• Cheyne, C., & Comrie, M. (2002). Enhanced legitimacy for local authority decision making: Challenges, setbacks and innovation. Policy and Politics, 30, 469–482. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tpp/pap/2002/00000030/00000004/art00002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Port Phillip (2002). St Kilda foreshore urban design framework. Melbourne: City of Port Phillip.
   Google Scholar
• City of Port Phillip (2004). Agenda – Strategy and Policy Review Committee. Strategy and Policy Review Committee, 5 July 2004.
   Google Scholar
• City of Port Phillip (2007). City of Port Phillip community plan 2007–2017. Melbourne: City of Port Phillip.
   Google Scholar
• City of Port Phillip (2010). City of Port Phillip planning scheme, St Kilda foreshore area policy – local planning policies, clause 22.09. City of Port Phillip. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• City of Port Phillip (2013a). City snapshot. City of Port Phillip. Retrieved October 23, 2013 from http://www.portphillip.vic.gov.au/about_copp.htm.
   Google Scholar
• City of Port Phillip (2013b). City overview. City of Port Phillip. Retrieved October 23, 2013 from http://www.portphillip.vic.gov.au/stkilda.htm.
   Google Scholar
• City of Port Phillip, Victoria (2009). City of Port Phillip: Ordinary meeting of council. City of Port Phillip. 25 May 2009.
   Google Scholar
• City of Port Phillip, Victoria (2011). Some facts about Port Phillip – 2011 census fact sheet. City of Port Phillip.
   Google Scholar
• Darbas, T. (2008). Reflexive governance of urban catchments: A case of deliberative truncation. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1454–1469. 10.1068/a39252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DPCD. (2010). A guide to governing shared community facilities. Melbourne: Department of Planning and Community Development, Government of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. (2010). Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. (2000). Deliberative democracy, ecological representation and risk: Towards a democracy of the affected. In M.Saward (Ed.), Democratic innovation: Deliberation, representation and association (pp. 117–132). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. (2004). The green state: Rethinking democracy and sovereignty. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2009). Dealing with differences: Dramas of mediating public disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, D. (2009). City of Port Phillip, the Triangle. Unpublished presentation, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Gunder, M., & Mouat, C. M. (2002). Symbolic violence and victimization in planning processes: A reconnoitre of the New Zealand resource management act. Planning Theory, 1, 124–145. 10.1177/147309520200100203.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartz-Karp, J. (2005). A case study in deliberative democracy: Dialogue with the city. Journal of Public Deliberation, 1, 1–15. Retrieved from http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au/cgi-bin/espace.pdf?file = /2011/08/24/file_1/164056.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M. (2006). Integrated deliberation: Reconciling civil society's dual role in deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 54, 486–508. 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00612.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley, J., Taylor, E., Cook, N., & Cole-Peisker, V. (2011). In the fast lane: Bypassing third party objections and appeals in planning approval processes party objections and appeals in planning approval processes. Paper presented at the State of Australian Cities Conference. Melbourne November 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building as role playing and bricolage: Toward a theory of collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65, 9–26. 10.1080/01944369908976031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5, 419–436. 10.1080/1464935042000293170.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jose, J. (2007). Reframing the ‘governance’ story. Australian Journal of Political Science, 42, 455–470. 10.1080/10361140701513588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. O. B., & Buckingham, S. (2012). Towards a “consensual” urban politics? Creative planning, urban sustainability and regional development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36, 486–503. 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01073.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., & Paddison, R. (2000). Trust and collaborative planning theory: The case of the Scottish planning system. International Planning Studies, 5, 205–223. doi: 10.1080/1356347005002019d.
   Google Scholar
• Land (St Kilda Triangle) Act. (2006). Victorian Government. Act No. 19/2006.
   Google Scholar
• Laurian, L. (2009). Trust in planning: Theoretical and practical considerations for participatory and deliberative planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 10, 369–391. 10.1080/14649350903229810.
   Google Scholar
• Legacy, C. (2012). Achieving legitimacy through deliberative plan-making processes – lessons for metropolitan strategic planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 13, 71–87. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.649947.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, D. (2008). Participatory planning and means-ends rationality: A translation problem. Planning Theory & Practice, 9, 325–343. 10.1080/14649350802277852.
   Google Scholar
• March, A., & Low, N. (2004). Knowing and steering: Mediatization, planning and democracy in Victoria, Australia. Planning Theory, 3, 41–69. 10.1177/1473095204042317.
   Google Scholar
• March, A. (2012). The democratic plan: Analysis and diagnosis. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Matrix Planning Australian. (2007). St Kilda site development plan, consideration of submissions. Collingwood. December 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Minnery, J. (2007). Stars and their supporting cast: State, market and community as actors in urban governance. Urban Policy and Research, 25, 325–345. 10.1080/08111140701540745.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, A. D. (2009). Learning communities, cities and regions for sustainable development and global citizenship. Local Environment, 14, 443–459. 10.1080/13549830902903773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouat, C. M., Legacy, C., & March, A. (2013). The problem is the solution: Testing agonistic theory's potential to recast intractable planning disputes. Urban Policy and Research, 31, 150–166. 10.1080/08111146.2013.776496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planning and Environment Act (1987). Government of Victoria Act no. 45/1987.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2002). Deliberative planning and decision making: An impossibility result. Journal of Planning Education Research, 21, 367–378. 10.1177/0739456X0202100402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkissian, W., & Hurford, D. (2010). Creative community planning: Transformative engagement methods for working at the edge. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K. (2005). The place of alternative culture and the politics of its protection in Berlin, Amsterdam and Melbourne. Planning Theory and Practice, 6, 149–169. 10.1080/14649350500136830.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K. (2008, February 15). Expect the unexpected when changing an iconic locale. The Age. Retrieved from http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/kate-shaw/2008/02/14/1202760488145.html?page = fullpage#contentSwap1.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, L. A. (1974). Urban legal problems. Sydney: The Law Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• unChain ST Kilda. (2008). In the Victorian civil and administrative tribunal planning and environment list – No. P2621/2008, UnChain St Kilda Inc. vs. Port Phillip City Council and BBC Triangle Investments Pty Ltd. VCAT Submission, 9 February 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar