Co-production and collaboration in planning – The difference

References

• Abers, R. (1998). From clientelism to cooperation: Local government, participatory policy, and civic organizing in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Brazil. Politics & Society, 26, 511–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, V. A. (2010). Participatory opportunity and collective action: A critical reflection on Brazil's recent experiments in democracy. Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research, 16, 133–149.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2013). Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective. Planning Theory, 12, 46–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (2001). Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environment and Urbanization, 13, 23–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (2012). Why enumeration counts. Environment and Urbanization, 24, 639–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, D. (2012). Finance as the key to unlocking community potential: Savings, funds and the ACCA programme. Environment and Urbanization, 24, 423–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, D., Luansang, C., & Boonmahathanakorn, S. (2012). Facilitating community mapping and planning for citywide upgrading: The role of community architects. Environment and Urbanization, 24, 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beall, J., & Fox, S. (2009). Cities and development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A. J., Mitlin, D., Mogaladi, J., Scurrah, M., & Bielich, C. (2010). Decentring poverty, reworking government: Social movements and states in the government of poverty. Journal of Development Studies, 46, 1304–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bènit-Gbaffou, C., & Oldfield, S. (2011). Accessing the state: Everyday practices and politics in cities of the south. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 46, 445–452.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community co-production of public services. Public Administration Review, 67, 846–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradlow, B. (2013). Quiet conflict: Social movements, institutional change, and upgrading informal settlements in South Africa. Master in City Planning dissertation, Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services. Public Management Review, 8, 493–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownill, S., & Parker, G. (2010). Why bother with good works? The relevance of public participation(s) in planning in a post-collaborative era. Planning Practice and Research, 25, 275–282.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterji, R., & Mehta, D. (2007). Living with violence: An anthropology of events and everyday life. New Delhi and Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chitekwe-Biti, B., Mudimu, P., Nyama, G. M., & Jera, T. (2012). Developing an informal settlement upgrading protocol in Zimbabwe – The Epworth story. Environment and Urbanization, 24, 131–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Wright, E. (2003). Deepening democracy. Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2012). The universal and the contingent: Some reflections on the transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. Planning Theory, 11, 188–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, J., & Healey, P. (2008). Contemporary movements in planning theory: Critical essays in planning theoryvol. 3. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, M. (2000). The limits to communicative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, 369–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & Moore, M. (2004). Institutionalised co-production: Unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. Journal of Development Studies, 40, 31–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livengood, A., & Kunte, K. (2012). Enabling participatory planning with GIS: A case study of settlement mapping in Cuttack, India. Environment and Urbanization, 24, 77–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2009). Translocal assemblages: Space, power and social movements. Geoforum, 40, 561–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2011). Learning the city. Knowledge and translocal assemblage. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P. M. (2001). Situating communicative planning theory: Context, power, and knowledge. Environment and Planning A, 33, 195–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meth, P. (2010). Unsettling insurgency: Reflections on women's insurgent practices in South Africa. Planning Theory and Practice, 11, 241–263.
   Google Scholar
• Miraftab, F. (2009). Insurgent planning: Situating radical planning in the global South. Planning Theory, 8, 32–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D. (2008). With and beyond the state – coproduction as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization, 20, 339–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24, 1073–1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, S., Baptist, C., & D'Cruz, C. (2012). Knowledge is power – Informal communities assert their right to the city through SDI and community-led enumerations. Environment and Urbanization, 24, 13–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, S., Cornwall, A., & Von Lieres, B. (2008). Rethinking “citizenship” in the post-colony. Third World Quarterly, 29, 1069–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2009a). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory, 8, 76–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2009b). Civic governmentality: The politics of inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai. Antipode, 41, 159–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seekings, J., & Keil, R. (2009). The international journal of urban and regional research: An editorial statement. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(2), i–x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN Habitat. (2009). Global report on human settlements: Planning sustainable cities. London: Earthscan
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V. (2002). The usefulness of normative planning theories in the context of sub-Saharan Africa. Planning Theory, 1, 27–52.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V. (2009). Seeing from the south: Refocusing urban planning on the globe's central urban issues. Urban Studies, 46, 2259–2275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, V., & Odendaal, N. (2013). Changing planning education in Africa: The role of the Association of African Planning Schools. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33, 96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O. (2009). Theoretical notes on “gray cities”: The coming of urban apartheid?Planning Theory, 8, 88–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar