132
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Policy & Planning Brief

Does ESPON support planning practice?

References

  • Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 743–758.
  • Barca, F. (2008). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectationsNo. EERI_RP_2008_06. Brussels: Economics and Econometrics Research Institute.
  • CEC. (2008). Green paper on territorial cohesion, turning diversity into strength. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • CSD. (1999). European spatial development perspective. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Dühr, S., Colombe, C., & Nadin, V. (2010). European spatial planning and territorial cooperation. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Faludi, A. (2010). Centenary paper: European spatial planning: Past, present and future. Town Planning Review, 81(1), 1–22.
  • Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies, towards a relational planning for our times. London: Routledge.
  • Loxley Consultancy. (2011). ESPON programme external evaluation. Lindfield: Loxley Consultancy. Retrieved from http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Programme/ProgrammeRelatedDocuments/Evaluation/C53011_-_ESPON_Approved_Final_Report.pdf.
  • Minghetti, A. (2008). Il modello dati del PSC. Urbanistica, 135, 80–81.
  • Ravesteyn, N., & Evers, D. (2006). Unseen Europe, a survey of EU politics and its impacts on spatial developments in the Netherlands. Den Haag: NAI and Ruimtelijk Planbuteau.
  • Teisman, G. R. (1998). Complexe Besluitvorming, een pluricentrisch perspectief op besluitvorming over ruimtelijke investeringen (3rd ed.). Den Haag: Vuga.
  • Teisman, G. R. (2000). Models for research into decision-making processes: On phases, streams and decision-making rounds. Public Administration, 78, 937–956.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.