References

  • Alexander, E. R. (2002). The public interest in planning: From legitimation to substantive plan evaluation. Planning Theory, 1(3): 226–249.
  • Campbell, H., Tait, M., & Watkins, C. (2014). Is there space for better planning in a neoliberal world? Implications for planning practice and theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(1): 45–59.
  • Gallent, N., de Magalhaes, C., Freire Trigo, S., Scanlon, K., & Whitehead C. (2019). Can ‘permission in principle’ for new housing in England increase certainty, reduce ‘planning risk’, and accelerate housing supply? Planning Theory & Practice, 20(5): 673–688.
  • Krieger, A. (2019). City on a hill: Urban idealism in America from the puritans to the present. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Parker, G., Street, E., & Wargent, M. (2018). The rise of the private sector in fragmentary planning in England. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(5): 734–750.
  • Rydin, Y. (2019). Silences, categories and black-boxes: Towards an analytics of the relations of power in planning regulation. Planning Theory, 19(2): 214–233.
  • Tasan-Kok, T. (2008). Changing interpretations of ‘flexibility’ in the planning literature: From opportunism to creativity? International Planning Studies, 13(3): 183–195.
  • Tasan-Kok, T., Bertolini, L., Oliveira e Costa, S., Lothan, H., Carvalho, H., Desmet, M., De Blust, S., Devos, T., Kimyon, S., Zoete J.A., & Ahmad, P. (2016). “Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee”: Giving voice to planning practitioners. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(4): 621–651.
  • Tasan-Kok, T., van den Hurk, M., Özogul, S., & Bittencourt, S. (2019a). Changing public accountability mechanisms in the governance of Dutch urban regeneration. European Planning Studies, 27(6): 1107–1128.
  • Tasan-Kok, T., Atkinson, R., & Refinetti Martins, M. L. (2019b). Complex planning landscapes: regimes, actors, instruments and discourses of contractual urban development. European Planning Studies, 27(6): 1059–1063.
  • Waldron, R. (2019). Financialization, urban governance and the planning system: Utilizing ‘Development Viability’ as a policy narrative for the liberalization of Ireland’s post‐crash planning system. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43(4): 685–704.
  • Zanotto, J. (2019). Detachment in planning practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 20(1): 37–52.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.