147
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Unseeing Racism: Naming Whiteness at the Intersections of Regimes of Data and Participation

ORCID Icon
Pages 679-694 | Received 28 Sep 2022, Accepted 30 Oct 2023, Published online: 22 Nov 2023

References

  • Adams, T., & Jones, S. H. (2008). Autoethnography is queer. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 373–390). Sage.
  • Anderson, C. (2020). White rage: The unspoken truth of our racial divide. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Barrett, E., & Bosse, A. J. (2022). Community geography for precarious researchers: Examining the intricacies of mutually beneficial and co-produced knowledge. GeoJournal, 87(Suppl 2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10358-2
  • Barrett, E., & Wilson, M. W. (2019). Mapshop: Learning to map, mapping to learn. Livingmaps Review, 0(6), 1–12. http://livingmaps.review/journal/index.php/LMR/article/view/166
  • Bates, L. K., with, Towne, S. A., Jordan, C. P., Lelliott, K. L., Bates, L. K., Towne, S. A., Jordan, C. P., Lelliott, K. L., Johnson, M. S., Wilson, B., Winkler, T., Livia Brand, A., Corbin, C. N. E., Jordan Miller, M., Koh, A., Freitas, K., & Roberts, A. R. ((2018). Race and spatial imaginary: Planning otherwise. [special issue]. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(2), 254–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2018.1456816
  • Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. Polity. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz162
  • Berglund, L., & Kitson, A. (2021). The redevelopment of the Nova Scotia home for colored children: A case for trauma-informed urban planning practices. Planning Theory & Practice, 22(5), 671–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1968476
  • Bonds, A. (2020). Race and ethnicity II: White women and the possessive geographies of white supremacy. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 778–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519863479
  • Bonds, A., & Inwood, J. (2016). Beyond white privilege: Geographies of white supremacy and settler colonialism. Progress in Human Geography, 40(6), 715–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515613166
  • Brand, A. L. (2018a). Say its name – Planning is the white spatial imaginary, or reading Mckittrick and Woods as planning text. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(2), 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2018.1456816
  • Brand, A. L. (2018b). The duality of space: The built world of Du bois’ double-consciousness. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817738782
  • Browne, S. (2015). Dark matters: On the surveillance of blackness. Duke University Press.
  • De Neufville, J. I. (1987). Knowledge and action: Making the link. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 6(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X8700600203
  • Derickson, K. D. (2016). On the politics of recognition in critical urban scholarship. Urban Geography, 37(6), 824–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1105483
  • DiAngelo, R. J. (2018). White fragility: Why it’s so hard for white people to talk about racism. Beacon Press.
  • D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data feminism. MIT Press.
  • Drew, E. M. (2012). “Listening through white ears”: Cross-racial dialogues as a strategy to address the racial effects of gentrification. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2011.00572.x
  • Dunn, C. E. (2007). Participatory GIS – A people’s GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 616–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507081493
  • Dwyer, O. J., & Jones, J. P. (2000). White socio-spatial epistemology. Social & Cultural Geography, 1(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360020010211
  • Elwood, S. (2021). Digital geographies, feminist relationality, black and queer code studies: Thriving otherwise. Progress in Human Geography, 45(2), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519899733
  • Evans, L., & Moore, W. L. (2015). Impossible burdens: White institutions, emotional labor, and micro-resistance. Social Problems, 62(3), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spv009
  • Ferreira, A. (2013). Emotions in planning practice: a critical review and a suggestion for future developments based on mindfulness. Town Planning Review, 84(6), 703–719. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2013.37
  • Gilmore, R. W. (2002). Fatal couplings of power and difference: Notes on racism and geography. The Professional Geographer, 54(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00310
  • Goetz, E. G., Williams, R. A., & Damiano, A. (2020). Whiteness and urban planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 86(2), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1693907
  • Green, B. (2019). The smart enough city: Putting technology in its place to reclaim our urban future. MIT Press.
  • Güiza, F., & Stuart, N. (2018). When citizens choose not to participate in volunteering geographic information to e-governance: A case study from Mexico. GeoJournal, 83(5), 1151–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-017-9820-9
  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
  • Harding, S. (1992). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? The Centennial Review, 36(3), 437–470.
  • Jefferson, B. J. (2018). Policing, data, and power-geometry: Intersections of crime analytics and race during urban restructuring. Urban Geography, 39(8), 1247–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2018.1446587
  • Karvonen, A., Cook, M., & Haarstad, H. (2020). Urban planning and the smart city: Projects, practices and politics. Urban Planning, 5(1), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2936
  • Knapp, C., Poe, J., & Forester, J. (2022). Repair and healing in planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 23(3), 425–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2022.2082710
  • Kontokosta, C. E., & Hong, B. (2021). Bias in smart city governance: How socio-spatial disparities in 311 complaint behavior impact the fairness of data-driven decisions. Sustainable Cities and Society, 64, 102503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102503
  • Krumholz, N. (1982). A retrospective view of equity planning cleveland 1969–1979. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368208976535
  • León, L. F. A., & Rosen, J. (2020). Technology as ideology in urban governance. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(2), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1660139
  • Leonardo, Z. (2004). The color of supremacy: beyond the discourse of ‘white privilege. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.00057.x
  • Leszczynski, A. (2016). Speculative futures: Cities, data, and governance beyond smart urbanism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(9), 1691–1708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16651445
  • Lipsitz, G. (1998). The possessive investment in whiteness: How white people profit from identity politics. Temple University Press.
  • McKittrick, K. (2006). Demonic grounds: Black women and the cartographies of struggle. University of Minnesota Press.
  • McKittrick, K. (2013). Plantation futures. Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism, 17(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1215/07990537-2378892
  • Mills, C. (2007). White ignorance. In S. Sullivan & N. Tuana (Eds.), Race and epistemologies of ignorance (pp. 13–38). State University of New York Press.
  • Mueller, J. C. (2017). Producing colorblindness: Everyday mechanisms of white ignorance. Social Problems, 64(2), 332–332. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spx012
  • Muhammad, K. G. (2010). The condemnation of blackness: Race, crime, and the making of modern urban America. Harvard University Press.
  • Neighborhoods in Transition Task Force. (2021). Lexington Urban County Council. https://lexingtonclt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/TFNT-FINAL-Report-6-24-21.pdf.
  • Osborne, N., & Grant-Smith, D. (2015). Supporting mindful planners in a mindless system: Limitations to the emotional turn in planning practice. Town Planning Review, 86(6), 677–698. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2015.39
  • Padley, M. E., & Gökarıksel, B. (2021). The affective politics of policy making spaces: Gendered and racial embodiments of neoliberal deservingness and power in a city council meeting. Emotion, Space and Society, 39, 100792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2021.100792
  • Pin, L. (2020). Race, citizenship and participation: Interrogating the racial dynamics of participatory budgeting. New Political Science, 42(4), 578–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2020.1840199
  • Pulido, L. (2008). Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in Southern California. In Environment (pp. 552–577). Routledge.
  • Quick, K. (2022). Just talk: the promise and peril of dialogues about whiteness. Planning Theory & Practice, 23(3), 425–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2022.2082710
  • Safransky, S. (2020). Geographies of algorithmic violence: Redlining the smart city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44(2), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12833
  • Sandercock, L. (2003). Out of the closet: The importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 4(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935032000057209
  • Schein, R. H. (2012). Urban form and racial order. Urban Geography, 33(7), 942–960. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.33.7.942
  • Srivastava, S., & Francis, M. (2006). The problem of ‘authentic experience’: Storytelling in anti-racist and anti-homophobic education. Critical Sociology, 32(2–3), 275–307. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916306777835330
  • Su, C. (2017). Beyond inclusion: Critical race theory and participatory budgeting. New Political Science, 39(1), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2017.1278858
  • Su, C. (2018). Managed participation: City agencies and micropolitics in participatory budgeting. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4_suppl), 76S–96S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018757029
  • Tenney, M., & Sieber, R. (2016). Data-driven participation: Algorithms, cities, citizens, and corporate control. Urban Planning, 1(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i2.645
  • Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). R-words: Refusing research. In D. Paris & M. T. Winn, Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 409–427). SAGE.
  • Wachs, M. (1989). When planners lie with numbers. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55(4), 476–479.
  • Wells-Barnett, I. B. (1894). The red record: Tabulated statistics and alleged causes of lynching in the United States. Donohue & Henneberry.
  • Williams, R. A. (2020). From racial to reparative planning: Confronting the white side of planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X20946416
  • Wingfield, A. H. (2010). Are some emotions marked “whites only”? racialized feeling rules in professional workplaces. Social Problems, 57(2), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2010.57.2.251
  • Zapata, M. A., & Bates, L. K. (Eds.). (2021). Planning just futures [special issue]. Planning Theory & Practice, 22(4), 613–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1956815

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.