The Productive Role of Future Expectations in Participatory Spatial Planning. A Case Study on Urban Park Development in The Netherlands

References

• Adam, B., & Groves, C. (2007). Future matters. Brill Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(5), 743–758. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balducci, A., Boelens, L., Hillier, J., Nyseth, T., & Wilkinson, C. (2011). Introduction: Strategic spatial planning in uncertainty: Theory and exploratory practice. Town Planning Review, 82(5), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2011.29
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (2013). Imagined futures: Fictional expectations in the economy. Theory and Society, 42(3), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-013-9191-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boezeman, D., Vink, M., Leroy, P., & Halffman, W. (2014). Participation under a spell of instrumentalization? Reflections on action research in an entrenched climate adaptation policy process. Critical Policy Studies, 8(4), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2014.950304
   Google Scholar
• Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3–4), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N., & Michael, M. (2003). A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(1), 3–18. http://research.gold.ac.uk/2379/2/SOC_Michael_2003a.pdf https://doi.org/10.1080/0953732032000046024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory – A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., & Kearnes, M. (2015). Remaking participation: Science, environment and emergent publics. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., & Kearnes, M. (2020). Remaking participation in science and democracy. Science Technology and Human Values, 45Issue(3), 347–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919850885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking “participation” models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, K., & Van Kempen, R. (2009). Participation, social cohesion and the challenges in the governance process: an analysis of a post-world war II neighbourhood in The Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 17(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802514011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E., Fredriksson, A., & Syssner, J. (2022). Opening the black box of participatory planning: A study of how planners handle citizens’ input. European Planning Studies, 30(6), 994–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1895974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, S. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Tharchen, T. (2018). Performativity as ongoing journeys: Implications for strategy, entrepreneurship, and innovation. Long Range Planning, 51(3), 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemeente Breda. (2016). Programmaplan Gasthuisvelden. Gemeente Breda.
   Google Scholar
• Gemeente Breda. (2021). Visie op Seelig Park. Gemeente Breda.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, C. (2017a). Emptying the future: On the environmental politics of anticipation. Futures, 92, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, C. (2017b). Remaking participation: Science, environment and emergent publics. Science as Culture, 26(3), 408–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2017.1297784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., & Thomas, R. (2014). Strategy, discourse and practice: The intensification of power. Journal of Management Studies, 51(2), 320–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, P. (1996). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23(2), 217–234.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, P. (2003). Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory, 2(2), 131–162. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203186152-14
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2011). Strategic navigation across multiple planes: Towards a Deleuzean-inspired methodology for strategic spatial planning. Town Planning Review, 82(5), 503–527. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2011.30
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000293170
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2015). Dreamscapes of modernity – Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2005). Science andcitizenship in a global context. In M. Leach, I. Scoones, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Science and citizens: Globalization and the challenges of engagement (pp. 15–38). ZED Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Michels, A. (2012). Citizen participation in local policy making: Design and democracy. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(4), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.661301
   Google Scholar
• Michels, A., & de Graaf, L. (2010). Examining citizen participation: Local participatory policy making and democracy. Local Government Studies, 36(4), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2010.494101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations. (2021). The environment and planning act of The Netherlands (issue june). Ministry of Interior and Kingdom Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Monno, V., & Khakee, A. (2012). Tokenism or political activism? Some reflections on participatory planning. International Planning Studies, 17(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2011.638181
   Google Scholar
• Oomen, J., Hoffman, J., & Hajer, M. A. (2022). Techniques of futuring: On how imagined futures become socially performative. European Journal of Social Theory, 25(2), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431020988826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parfitt, T. (2004). The ambiguity of participation: A qualified defence of participatory development. Third World Quarterly, 25(3), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000191429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991–2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, A. (2017). Rethinking participation, rethinking planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(4), 566–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1371788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Metze, T., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N., & Louder, E. (2020). The politics of co-production: Participation, power, and transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42(2018), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009
   Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S., & Aarts, N. (2010). How participation creates citizens: Participatory governance as performative practice. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03701-150426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Verschraegen, G., & Gruezmacher, M. (2021). Strategy for collectives and common goods: Coordinating strategy, long-term perspectives and policy domains in governance. Futures, 128(March 2020), 102716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102716
   Google Scholar
• Van Asselt Marjolein, B. A., & Rijkens-Klomp, N. (2002). A look in the mirror: Reflection on participation in integrated assessment from a methodological perspective. Global Environmental Change, 12(3), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00012-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Mosselaer, F. (2023). A performative futures perspective on co-creation in spatial strategy formation Ferry van de Mosselaer [Issue PhD thesis]. KU Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, P. (2019). Dialogen over ruimte, planning en ontwerp in Vlaanderen en Brussel. In A. Kuhk, H. Heynen, L. Huybrechts, J. Schreurs, & F. Moulaert (Eds.), Participatiegolven (pp. 73–98). Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Lente, H. (2012). Navigating foresight in a sea of expectations: Lessons from the sociology of expectations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(8), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.715478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakhour, S. (2020). The democratic legitimacy of public participation in planning: Contrasting optimistic, critical, and agnostic understandings. Planning Theory, 19(4), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219897404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar