Advanced search
Publication Cover
Planning Theory & Practice Volume 24, 2023 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
759
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

How Can Co-Creation Support Capacity Building for Adaptive Spatial Planning? Exploring Evidence from a Co-Creative Planning Process in The Netherlands

Maria Alina Rădulescua Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands;b Faculty of Law, University of Groningen, Groningen, The NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5022-4710View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Wim Leendertsea Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands;c Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management, Utrecht, The NetherlandsORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7706-1272View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Jos Artsa Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands;d Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South AfricaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6896-3992View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 639-662 | Received 23 Aug 2022, Accepted 22 Nov 2023, Published online: 23 Dec 2023

References

  • Acharya, C., Ojha, D., Gokhale, R., & Patel, P. C. (2022). Managing information for innovation using knowledge integration capability: The role of boundary spanning objects. International Journal of Information Management, 62, 102438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102438
  • Akhilesh, K. B. (2017). Co-creation and learning. Springer India.
  • Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
  • Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2021). Public governance as co-creation: A strategy for revitalizing the public sector and rejuvenating democracy (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizeA participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
  • Battilana, J., & Casciaro, T. (2012). Change agents, networks, and institutions: A contingency theory of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0891
  • Bonvillian, W. B., & Weiss, C. (2015). Technological innovation in legacy sectors. Oxford University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
  • Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
  • Byskov, M. F. (2020). Four challenges to knowledge integration for development and the role of philosophy in addressing them. Journal of Global Ethics, 16(3), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2020.1858324
  • Cars, G., Healey, P., Madanipour, A., & de Magalhães, C. S. (Eds.). (2017). Urban governance, institutional capacity and social milieux. Routledge.
  • Edelenbos, J., van Buuren, A., & van Schie, N. (2011). Co-producing knowledge: Joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(6), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.004
  • Eindrapport co-creatieproces Hegewarren. (2021). https://toekomsthegewarren.frl/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/20211221_Rapportage_co-creatie_Hegewarren_DEF_lowres.pdf
  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again (S. Sampson, Trans.; 1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Goudswaard, T., & van Oosten, J. (2022). Maakkracht: Een nieuwe benadering voor complexe vraagstukken. Uitgeverij Business Contact.
  • Haataja, M., Hautamäki, A., Holm, E., Pulkkinen, K., & Suni, T. (2018). Co-creation a guide to enhancing the collaboration between universities and companies (978-951-51-4096–8). University of Helsinki.
  • Hagman, K., Hirvikoski, T., Wollstén, P., & Äyväri, A. (2018). Handbook for co-creation. Theseus. https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/159825
  • Hajer, M. A. (1997). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/019829333X.001.0001
  • Hajer, M. A. (2005). Rebuilding ground zero. The politics of performance. Planning Theory & Practice, 6(4), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350500349623
  • Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136
  • Healey, P. (2006). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hedlund, G. (1999). The intensity and extensity of knowledge and the multinational corporation as a nearly recomposable system (NRS). MIR: Management International Review, 39(1), 5–44. WorldCat.org
  • Heikkinen, M. T., Mainela, T., Still, J., & Tähtinen, J. (2007). Roles for managing in mobile service development nets. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(7), 909–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.05.014
  • Hilbers, A. M., Sijtsma, F. J., Busscher, T., & Arts, J. (2022). Identifying citizens’ place values for integrated planning of road infrastructure projects. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 113(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12487
  • Johnson, S. A., & Romanello, M. L. (2005). Generational diversity: Teaching and learning approaches. Nurse Educator, 30(5), 212–216. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006223-200509000-00009
  • Kemp, R., Parto, S., & Gibson, R. B. (2005). Governance for sustainable development: Moving from theory to practice. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1/2), 12. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2005.007372
  • Khakee, A. (2002). Assessing institutional capital building in a local agenda 21 process in Göteborg. Planning Theory & Practice, 3(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350220117807
  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
  • Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_06
  • Kyttä, M., Broberg, A., Tzoulas, T., & Snabb, K. (2013). Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: Location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental quality. Landscape and Urban Planning, 113, 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.008
  • Laine, M., Leino, H., & Santaoja, M. (2022). Building citizens’ trust in urban infill: A dynamic approach. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 42(3), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18817089
  • Leino, H., & Puumala, E. (2021). What can co-creation do for the citizens? Applying co-creation for the promotion of participation in cities. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39(4), 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420957337
  • Lovell, H., Bulkeley, H., & Owens, S. (2009). Converging agendas? Energy and climate change policies in the UK. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(1), 90–109. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0797j
  • Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Managing change: The role of the change agent. International Journal of Management, Business and Administration, 13(1), 1–6.
  • Mangelsdorf, M. E. (2018). The trouble with homogeneous teams. MIT Sloan Management Review, 59(2), 43–47.
  • McKenna, C. J. (2021). An invisible operational mortar: The essential role of speech acts within tri-segregated moviegoing. AILA Review, 34(1), 102–121. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.20010.mck
  • Meyer, E. (2015). The culture map: Decoding how people think, lead, and get things done across cultures (International ed.). PublicAffairs.
  • Möllering, G. (2008). Inviting or avoiding deception through trust? Conceptual exploration of an ambivalent relationship (MPIfG Working Paper 08/1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1105060
  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373
  • Nyström, A.-G., Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Kortelainen, M. (2014). Actor roles and role patterns influencing innovation in living labs. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.016
  • Polk, M. (2011). Institutional capacity-building in urban planning and policy-making for sustainable development: Success or failure? Planning Practice and Research, 26(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2011.560461
  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015
  • Puerari, E., de Koning, J., von Wirth, T., Karré, P., Mulder, I., & Loorbach, D. (2018). Co-creation dynamics in urban living labs. Sustainability, 10(6), 1893. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061893
  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002
  • Rădulescu, M. A., Leendertse, W., & Arts, J. (2020). Conditions for co-creation in infrastructure projects: Experiences from the Overdiepse polder project (The Netherlands). Sustainability, 12(18), 7736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187736
  • Rădulescu, M. A., Leendertse, W., & Arts, J. (2022). Living labs: A creative and collaborative planning approach. In A. Franklin (Ed.), Co-creativity and engaged scholarship (pp. 457–491). Springer International Publishing.
  • Reagans, R. (2011). Close encounters: Analyzing how social similarity and propinquity contribute to strong network connections. Organization Science, 22(4), 835–849. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0587
  • Rill, B. R., & Hämäläinen, M. M. (2018). The art of co-creation: A guidebook for practitioners. Springer Singapore.
  • Rotmans, J., & Verheijden, M. (2021). Omarm de chaos (4e druk). De Geus.
  • Schulenkorf, N. (2010). The roles and responsibilities of a change agent in sport event development projects. Sport Management Review, 13(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2009.05.001
  • Som, D. L. (2014). The capitals of nations: The role of human, social, and institutional capital in economic evolution. Oxford University Press.
  • Steen, K., & Van Bueren, E. (2017). Urban living labs a living lab way of working. Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions (AMS).
  • Swain, C., & Tait, M. (2007). The crisis of trust and planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 8(2), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350701324458
  • Szreter, S., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33(4), 650–667. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh013
  • Torfing, J., Ferlie, E., Jukić, T., & Ongaro, E. (2021). A theoretical framework for studying the co-creation of innovative solutions and public value. Policy & Politics, 49(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16108172803520
  • Van Buuren, A., & Edelenbos, J. (2004). Why is joint knowledge production such a problem? Science and Public Policy, 31(4), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154304781779967
  • Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in interorganizational collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886303039001001
  • Verhoeven, D. (2021). Knowledge diversity in teams and innovation (Working Paper). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3795476
  • Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
  • Whitehouse, M., Rahm, H., Wozniak, S., Breunig, S., De Nardi, G., Dionne, F., Fujio, M., Graf, E.-M., Matic, I., McKenna, C. J., Steiner, F., & Sviķe, S. (2021). Developing shared languages: The fundamentals of mutual learning and problem solving in transdisciplinary collaboration. AILA Review, 34(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00038.int
  • Williams, M. (2016). Being trusted: How team generational age diversity promotes and undermines trust in cross-boundary relationships: Does team generational diversity influence dyadic trust? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(3), 346–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2045

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.