References

• Abell, J., Locke, A., Condor, S., Gibson, S., & Stevenson, C. (2006). Trying similarity, doing difference: The role of interviewer self-disclosure in interview talk with young people. Qualitative Research, 6(2), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106062711
   Google Scholar
• Ackerly, B., & True, J. (2008). Reflexivity in practice: Power and ethics in feminist research on international relations. International Studies Review, 10(4), 693–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00826.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askins, K., & Blazek, M. (2017). Feeling our way: Academia, emotions and a politics of care. Social & Cultural Geography, 18(8), 1086–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1240224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakewell, O. (2008). Research beyond the categories: The importance of policy irrelevant research into forced migration. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(4), 432–453. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caretta, M. A. (2015). Situated knowledge in cross-cultural, cross-language research: A collaborative reflexive analysis of researcher, assistant and participants subjectivities. Qualitative Research, 15(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114543404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carling, J., Erdal, M. B., & Ezzati, R. (2014). Beyond the insider-outsider divide in migration research. Migration Studies, 2(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnt022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark-Kazak, C. (2017). Ethical considerations: Research with people in situations of forced migration. Refuge, 33(2), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.7202/1043059ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawley, H., & Skleparis, D. (2018). Refugees, migrants, neither, both: Categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe’s ‘migration crisis’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1348224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahinden, J. (2016). A plea for the ‘de-migranticization’ of research on migration and integration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(13), 2207–2225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2015.1124129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling, J. (2014). Emotions, encounters and expectations: The uncertain ethics of ‘the field’. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 6(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huu011
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, K. E. (2018). Negotiated positionalities and ethical considerations of fieldwork on migration: Interviewing the interviewer. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 17(1), 88–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrkamp, P. (2017). Geographies of migration I: Refugees. Progress in Human Geography, 41(6), 813–822. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516663061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, K. V. L. (1994). Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, B., & Hearn, J. (2004). Researching others: Epistemology, experience, standpoints and participation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7(3), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570210163989
   Google Scholar
• Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E., Loescher, G., Long, K., & Sigona, N. (2014). Introduction: Refugee and forced migration studies in transition. In E. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, G. Loescher, K. Long, & N. Sigona (Eds.), The oxford handbook of refugee and forced migration studies (pp. 1–19). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ganga, D., & Scott, S. (2006). Cultural “insiders” and the issue of positionality in qualitative migration research: Moving “across” and moving “along” researcher-participant divides. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(3), Art. 7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghorashi, H. (2005). Agent of change or passive victims: The impact of welfare states (the case of the Netherlands) on refugees. Journal of Refugee Studies, 18(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/refuge/fei020
   Google Scholar
• Ghorashi, H. (2020). Failed promise of equality: Iranian women’s integration in the Netherlands. International Migration, 59(4), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooks, B. (1990). Yearning: Race, gender and cultural politics. South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, P. E. (2007). Positionalities and knowledge: Negotiating ethics in practice. ACME, 6(3), 386–394.
   Google Scholar
• Huizinga, R. P., & van Hoven, B. (2018). Everyday geographies of belonging: Syrian refugee experiences in the Northern Netherlands. Geoforum, 96, 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huizinga, R. P., & van Hoven, B. (2021). Hegemonic masculinities after forced migration: Exploring relational performances of Syrian refugee men in the Netherlands. Gender, Place & Culture, 28(8), 1151–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2020.1784102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, K., & Landau, L. B. (2003). The dual imperative in refugee research: Some methodological and ethical considerations in social science research on forced migration. Disasters, 27(3), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapinga, L., Huizinga, R. P., & Shaker, R. (2020). Reflexivity through positionality meetings: Religion, Muslims and ‘non-religious’ researchers. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1853876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, A. (2003). GPC ten years on: Is self-reflexivity enough?. Gender, Place & Culture, 10(4), 345–349.
   Google Scholar
• Kohl, E., & McCutcheon, P. (2015). Kitchen table reflexivity: Negotiating positionality through everyday talk. Gender, Place & Culture, 22(6), 747–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2014.958063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkki, L. (1995). Refugees and exile: From “refugee studies” to the national order of things. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1), 495–523. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.002431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431–466. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., Johnson-Bailey, J., Lee, M. -Y., Kee, Y., Ntseane, G., & Muhamad, M. (2001). Power and positionality: Negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(5), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370120490
   Google Scholar
• Miled, N. (2019). Muslim researcher researching Muslim youth: Reflexive notes on critical ethnography, positionality and representation. Ethnography and Education, 14(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2017.1387063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, S. (2008). Personality: A new positionality? Area, 40(3), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00815.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Funk, L. (2020). Research with refugees in fragile political contexts: How ethical reflections impact methodological choices. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(2), 2308–2332. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musterd, S., & de Pater, B. (2003). Eclectic and pragmatic: The colours of Dutch social and cultural geography. Social & Cultural Geography, 4(4), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464936032000137984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagar, R. (2014). Muddying the waters: Coauthoring feminisms across scholarship and activism. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagar, R. (2019). Hungry translations: The world through radical vulnerability. Antipode, 51(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagar, R., & Geiger, S. (2007). Reflexivity and positionality in feminist fieldwork revisited. In A. Tickell, E. Sheppard, J. Peck, & T. Barnes (Eds.), Politics and practice in economic geography (pp. 267–278). Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Nast, H. (1994). Women in the field: Critical feminist methodologies and theoretical perspectives. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00054.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, L. (2015). “Inside” and “outside” of what or where? Researching migration through multi-positionalities. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(2), Art. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, L., Kofman, E., & Aaron, P. (2011). Insiders and outsiders: Working with peer researchers in researching Muslim communities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.481835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltsman, A., & Jacobsen, K. (2021). Introduction by editors: Power in forced migration research methods. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(3), 2511–2521. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feab058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S. (2018). Me again: Fieldwork, practice and returning. Area, 51, 508–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. (2005). Geography and gender: Feminist methodologies in collaboration and in the field. Progress in Human Geography, 29(3), 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph550pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrant, A. (2014). Negotiating multiple positionalities in the interview setting: Researching across gender and generational boundaries. The Professional Geographer, 66(3), 493–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2013.805621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. (2010). Prejudice: Rethinking geographies of oppression. Social & Cultural Geography, 11(6), 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2010.497849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoven, B., Meijering, L., & Thomas, M. (2011). On the ground: Thinking about people, elements and relations involved in the production of knowledge. In V. J. Del Casino Jr., P. Cloke, & R. Panelli (Eds.), A companion to social geography (pp. 161–180). Wiley- Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ramshorst, J. P. (2020). Studying migration in the time of Trump: Power, positionality and formal politics in the field. The Professional Geographer, 72(2), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2019.1662819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, H. F. (2013). Learning to think differently: Diversity training and the ‘good encounter’. Geoforum, 45, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar