The effectiveness of alternating rapid maxillary expansion and constriction combined with maxillary protraction in the treatment of patients with a class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Al-Mozany S , Dalci O, Almuzian M, Gonzalez C, Tarraf NE, Darendeliler M. 2017. A novel method for treatment of class III malocclusion in growing patients. Prog Orthod. 18(1):437.
   Google Scholar
• Almuzian M, Ju X, Almukhtar A, Ayoub A, Al-Muzian L, McDonald JP. 2018. Does rapid maxillary expansion affect nasopharyngeal airway? A prospective cone beam computerised tomography (CBCT) based study. Surgeon. 16(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almuzian M, Short L, Isherwood G, Al-Muzian L, McDonald J. 2016. Rapid maxillary expansion: a review of appliance designs, biomechanics and clinical aspects. Orthodont Update J. 9(3):90–95.
   Google Scholar
• Chang D, Zhou Y, Liu W. 2017. Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography on upper airway changes after alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction. J Peking Uni Health Sciences. 49(4):685–690.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Xie X. 2012. The effect of two different methods of rapid maxillary expansion on treatment results of skeletal class III malocclusion patients with maxillary protraction in early permanent dentition. Shanghai J Stomatol. 21(5):580–583.
   Google Scholar
• Do-deLatour T, Ngan P, Martin C, Ramus T, Gunel E. 2009. Effect of alternate maxillary expansion and contraction on protraction of the maxilla: a pilot study. Hong Kong Dent J. 6(2):72–82.
   Google Scholar
• Egger M, Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. 1997. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J . 315(7109):629–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foersch M, Jacobs C, Wriedt S, Hechtner M, Wehrbein H. 2015. Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinic Oral Invest. 19(6):1181–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas A. 1970. Palatal expansion: just the beginning of dentofacial orthopedics. Am J Orthodont. 57:219–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higgins J, Altman D, Gotzche P, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman A, Savovic J, Schulz K, Weeks L, Sterne J. 2011. The cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. British Med J. 343:d5928 –d5928 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isci D, Turk T, Elekdag-Turk S. 2010. Activation-deactivation rapid palatal expansion and reverse headgear in class III cases . Europ J Orthodont. 32(6):706–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya D, Kocadereli I, Kan B, Tasar F. 2011. Effects of facemask treatment anchored with miniplates after alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions; a pilot study. Angle Orthod. 81(4):639–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou EJW, Tsai WC. 2005. A new protocol for maxillary protraction in cleft patients: repetitive weekly protocol of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J. 42(2):121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Zhou Y. 2009. A primary study on maxillary protraction therapy with two different methods of rapid palatal expansion. Chin J Orthod. 16(1):5.
   Google Scholar
• Liu WT, Zhou YH. 2013. Effect of repetitive rapid palatal expansions and constrictions by double hinged expander in maxillary protraction cases. J Peking Uni Health Sci. 45 (1):69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Liu WT, Zhou YH. 2014. Effects of intraoral maxillary protraction with repetitive rapid palatal expansions and constrictions. Chin J Orthod. 21(3):132–140.
   Google Scholar
• Liu W, Zhou Y, Wang X, Liu D, Zhou S. 2015. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: A single-center, randomized controlled trial . Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped. 148(4):641–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masucci C, Franchi L, Giuntini V, Defraia E. 2014. Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol for early treatment of class III malocclusion: a controlled study. Orthodont Craniofac Res. 17(4):259–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6(7):e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngan P, Hägg U, Yiu C, Wei SH. 1997. Treatment response and long-term dentofacial adaptations to maxillary expansion and protraction. Seminar Orthodont. 3:255–264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pithon M, Santos N, Santos C, Baiao F, Pinheiro M, Matos M, Souza I, Paula R. 2016. Is alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction an effective protocol in the treatment of class III malocclusion? A systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 21(6):34–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turley P. 2007. Treatment of the class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and protraction. Seminar Orthodont. 13:143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Chang P, Liou E. 2009. Opening of circumaxillary sutures by alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions . Angle Orthodont. 79:230–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong Z, Jie K, Zhao G, Lin Q. 2017. The effect of maxillary protraction therapy on skeletal class III malocclusion with two different methods of rapid maxillary expansion. Chin J Stomato Res. 11(3):5.
   Google Scholar
• Yao N, Lin W, Yogjia G, Bin Z, Wenqian X, Meiqin G. 2015. A comparative study on maxillary protraction therapy with two different methods of rapid palatal expansion. Chin of Stomato Res. 9:3.
   Google Scholar