References
- Brown T. G., Seraganian P., Tremblay J., Annis H. Matching substance abuse aftercare treatments to client characteristics. Addictive Behaviors 2002; 27: 585–604
- Deci E. L., Vallerand R. J., Pelletier L. G., Ryan R. M. Motivation and education: the self‐determination perspective. Educational Psychologist 1991; 26((3/4))325–346
- Fiorentine R., Hillhouse M. P. Exploring the additive effects of drug misuse treatment and twelve‐step involvement: does twelve‐step ideology matter?. Substance Use & Misuse 2000; 35((3))367–397
- Humphreys K., Noke J. M., Moos R. H. Recovering substance abuse staff members' beliefs about addiction. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1996; 13: 75–78
- Klaw E., Humphreys K. Life stories of moderation management mutual help group members. Contemporary Drug Problems 2000; 27: 779–803
- Laudet A. B. Attitudes and beliefs about 12 step groups among addiction treatment clients and clinicians: toward identifying obstacles to participation. Substance Use & Misuse 2003; 38((14))2017–2047
- Litt M. D., Babor T. F., DelBoca F. K., Kadden R. M., Cooney N. L. Types of alcoholics, II. Application of an empirically derived typology to treatment matching. Archives of General Psychiatry 1992; 49((8))609–614
- Mankowski E. S., Humphreys K., Moos R. H. Individual and contextual predictors of involvement in twelve‐step self‐help groups after substance abuse treatment. American Journal of Community Psychology 2001; 29((4))537–563
- Maude‐Griffin P. M., Hohenstein J. M., Humfleet G. L., Reilly P. M., Tusel D. J., Hall S. M. Superior efficacy of cognitive–behavioral therapy for urban crack cocaine abusers: main and matching effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1998; 66((5))832–837
- McLellan A. T., Grissom G. R., Zanis D., Randall M., Brill P., O'Brien C. P. Problem–service ‘matching’ in addiction treatment: a prospective study in 4 programs. Archives of General Psychiatry 1997; 54: 730–735
- Poznyak V. B., Pelipas V. E., Vievski A. N., Miroshnichenko L. Illicit drug use and its health consequences in Belarus, Russian Federation and Ukraine: impact of transition. European Addiction Research 2002; 8: 184–189
- Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1997a; 58: 7–29
- Project MATCH Research Group. Project MATCH secondary a priori hypotheses. Addiction 1997b; 92: 1671–1698
- Rosenblum A., Foote J., Cleland C., Magura S., Mahmood D., Kosanke N. Moderators of effects of motivational enhancements to cognitive behavioral therapy. American Journal on Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2005; 31((2))357
- Sobolev V. A., Rushchenko I. P. Methods of statistic observation and data use for sociological analysis of the problem. Youth and Drugs (Sociology of Narcotism). 2000; 130–158
- Sterling R. C., Gottheil E., Glassman S. D., Weinstein S. P., Serota R. D. Patient treatment choice and compliance. Data from a substance abuse treatment program. American Journal on Addictions 1997; 6((2))168–176
- Stokes M. E., Davis C. S., Koch G. G. Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System, 2nd edn. SAS Institute Inc, Cary 2001
- Thorton C. C., Gottheil E., Weinstein S. P., Kerachsky R. S. Patient–treatment matching in substance abuse: drug addiction severity. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1998; 15((6))505–511
- UNAIDS/WHO Working Group on Global HIV/AIDS and STI Surveillance. Epidemiological Fact Sheets on HIV/AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Infections: Ukraine 2004, Geneva. WHO, 2004