Syringe vending machines as a form of needle syringe programme: Advantages and disadvantages

References

• Agnoletto V., Tradati C., Ceserani N., Capra E., Andolina P., Lesomo C. Street work and needle exchange machines as complementary strategies of HIV harm reduction among active drug users: An Italian model (Abstract no. WS‐D09‐4). Program and Abstracts of the Ninth International Conference on AIDS. 1993, Berlin, Germany. Available at: http://www.aegis.com/conferences/iac/1993/WSD094.html (accessed August 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Aitken C. New Zealand needle and syringe exchange programme review final report. 2002, Wellington. Center for Harm Reduction
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. German towns fund syringe automat for injectors. Druglink 1989; 4: 6
   Google Scholar
• Apothicom. 2006. Steribox: An AIDS prevention kit. Available at: http://www.steribox.tm.fr/english/research/virus.htm (accessed 12 June 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Association of Needle and Syringe Programs. Syringe‐dispensing machines., Anex Bulletin. 3. 1
   Google Scholar
• Authority of the Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory. Transcript of evidence—Access to syringes by intravenous drug users. Canberra, Standing Committee on Health
   Google Scholar
• Baron C. HIV/AIDS policies and the role of the voluntary sector: A comparative report of Sweden, Germany and Italy. Discussion Paper No. 10. LSE Health, the London School of Economics and Political Science, London 1999, Available at: http://www.ise.ac.uk/collections/LSEHealthAndSocialCare/pdf/healthAndSocialCareDiscussionPaperSeries/DP10.pdf (accessed September 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Baxter T. Syringe‐dispensing machines—a KRC perspective. Anex Bulletin 2005; 3: 5
   Google Scholar
• Berg R. Needle and syringe vending machine trial evaluation report 1. NSW Department of Health, Sydney 1993
   Google Scholar
• Berg R. Needle and syringe vending machine trial evaluation report 2. NSW Department of Health, Sydney 1995
   Google Scholar
• Berger A. Vending machine enlisted in AIDS fight. New York Times 1999; F7, December 28
   Google Scholar
• Boutwell A. E., Wolf F. A., McKenzie M., Sanford‐Colby S. L., Fulton J. P., Rich J. D. A comparison of syringe prescription and syringe exchange in Rhode Island, USA. International Journal of Drug Policy 2003; 14: 457–459
   Google Scholar
• Burrows D. Starting and managing needle and syringe programs: A guide for central and Eastern Europe and the newly independent states of the former Soviet Union. International Harm Reduction Development, New York 2000
   Google Scholar
• Cazaly V. French activists shocked by the shortcomings of public health programmes for drug users in Portugal. Change 2000; 3: 7
   Google Scholar
• Clarke K., Sheridan J., Griffiths P., Noble A., Williamson S., Taylor C. Pharmacy needle exchange: do clients and community pharmacists have matching perceptions?. The Pharmaceutical Journal 2001; 266: 553–556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffin P. Syringe availability as HIV prevention: A review of modalities. Journal of Urban Health 2000; 77: 306–330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corr C. Reaching the ‘Hard to Reach’. Proceedings presented at the Conference on ‘Problem Drug Use and Homelessness: Two Faces of Social Exclusion’. 2002, 18 July, 2002, Dublin Castle, Ireland. Available at: http://www.ndc.hrb.ie/attached/1684‐1589.pdf (accessed August 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Diseth T. H. The syringe dispenser project in Larvik: Experience after one year. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforense 1989; 109: 3345–3348 (Abstr PMID: 2595707)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dodding J., Gaughwin M. The syringe in the machine. Australian Journal of Public Health 1995; 19: 406–409
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolan K., Topp L., MacDonald M. Needle and syringe programs: A review of the evidence. Australian National Council on AIDS, Hepatitis and Related Diseases, Canberra 2000
   Google Scholar
• Drug Policy Expert Committee, Drugs: Responding to the issues—engaging the community, Stage One Report. Available at: http://www.health.vic.gov.au/drugservices/downloads/dpec_stg1fi.pdf (accessed September 2006)
   Google Scholar
• European Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction. 2005. Programmes for needle and syringe provision, Annual Report 2005. In. Statistical bulletin–2005. Available at: http://stats06.emcdda.europa.eu/en/elements/nsptab06‐en.html (accessed September 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Fuller J. Needle exchange: Saving lives. America 1998; 179: 8–11
   Google Scholar
• Glanz A., Byrne C., Jackson P. Role of community pharmacists in prevention of AIDS among injecting drug misusers. Findings of a survey in England and Wales. Br Med J 1989; 299: 1076–1079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson C. 2006. How the program works. In. Needle Exchange Program. Available at: http://www.needle.co.nz/fastpage/fpengine.php/templateid/3 (accessed 28 May 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Jacob J., Stöver H. The transfer of harm‐reduction strategies into prisons: needle exchange programmes in two German prisons. International Journal of Drug Policy 2000; 11: 325–335
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laufer F. N. Cost‐effectiveness of syringe exchange as an HIV prevention strategy. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2001; 28: 273–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leicht A. Characteristics and HIV‐infection of users of syringe vending‐machines and exchanging programs in Berlin/Germany. Program and abstracts of the Ninth International Conference on AIDS (Abstract PO‐D17‐3931), 6–11 June, 1993. 1993, Berlin, Germany. Available at: http://www.aeqis.com/conferences/iac/1993/POD173931.html (accessed August 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Lenton S., Kerry K., Loxley W., Tan‐Quigley A., Greig R. Citizens who inject drugs: The Fitpack study. International Journal of Drug Policy 2000; 11: 285–297
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lurie P., Drucker E. An opportunity lost: HIV infections associated with lack of a national needle‐exchange programme in the USA. Lancet 1997; 349: 604–608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lurie P., Reingold A. L., Bowser B., Chen D., Foley J., Guydish J., Kahn J. G., Lane S., Sorensen J. The Public Health impact of needle exchange programs in the United States and Abroad: Summary, conclusions and recommendations. University of California, San Francisco 1993
   Google Scholar
• McDonald D. ACT Syringe vending machines trial 2004–2006. 2005, Canberra: Australia. Siggins Miller in association with David McDonald, Social Research & Evaluation Pty Ltd. Progress report No. 1 to ACT Health. Available at: http://www.health.act.gov.au/c/health?a = sendfile&ft = p&fid = 1157423951&sid = (accessed August 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Moatti J. P., Vlahov D., Feroni I., Perrin V., Obadia Y. Multiple access to sterile syringes for injection drug users: vending machines, needle exchange programs and legal pharmacy sales in Marseille, France. European Addiction Research 2001; 7: 40–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moloney A. Evaluation of the fitpacks vending machine trial at Kalgoorlie regional hospital, Australia. Northern Goldfields Health Services Public & Community Health, Kalgoorlie 2001
   Google Scholar
• Obadia Y., Feroni I., Perrin V., Vlahov D., Moatti J. P. Syringe vending machines for injecting drug users: an experiment in Marseille, France. American Journal of Public Health 1999; 89: 1582–1584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogborne A. C., Carver V., Wiebe J. Harm reduction in Switzerland. Harm reduction and injection drug use: An international comparative study of contextual factors influencing the development and implementation of relevant policies and programs. Health Canada, Ottawa 2001, Available at: http//www.phac‐aspc.qc.ca/hepc/hepatitis_c/pdf/harm_reduction_e.pdf (accessed September 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Rockwell R., Jarlais D. C. D., Friedman S. R., Perlis T. E., Paone D. Geographic proximity, policy and utilization of syringe exchange programmes. Aids Care 1999; 11: 437–442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross M. W., Wodak A., Stowe A., Gold J. Explanations for sharing injection equipment in injecting drug users and barriers to safer drug use. Addiction 1994; 89: 473–479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp R., Davis M., Dowsett G. W., Kippax S., Hewitt K., Morgan S., Robertson W. Ways of using: functional injecting drug users' project. NSW Health Department, Sydney 1991
   Google Scholar
• Singer M., Baer H. A., Scott G., Horowitz S., Weinstein B. Pharmacy access to syringes among injecting drug users: follow‐up findings from Hartford, Connecticut. Public Health Reports 1998; 113: 81–89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stark K., Leicht A., Müller R. Characteristics of users of syringe vending machines in Berlin. Sozial und Praventivmedizin 1994; 39: 209–216
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stöver H., Nelles J. Ten years of experience with needle and syringe exchange programmes in European prisons. International Journal of Drug Policy 2003; 14: 437–444
   Google Scholar
• Strike C., Challacombe L., Myers T., Millson M. Needle exchange programs: Delivery and access issues. Canadian Journal of Public Health 2002; 93: 339–343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strike C. J., Myers T., Millson M. Finding a place for needle exchange programs. Critical Public Health 2004; 14: 261–275
   Google Scholar
• Telles P. R., Bastos F. I., Guydish J., Inciardi J. A., Surratt H. L., Pearl M., et al. Risk behavior and HIV seroprevalence among injecting drug users in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. AIDS 1997; 11((Suppl. 1))S35–S42
   Google Scholar
• Treloar C., Cao W. Barriers to use of needle and syringe programmes in a high drug use area of Sydney, New South Wales. International Journal of Drug Policy 2005; 16: 308–315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinh D. Q. A qualitative study on HIV risk among injecting drug users in Vietnam: Reasons for sharing syringes and needles. Medical Anthropology. Amsterdam, Amsterdam 2002; 96, Available at: http://www.unaids.org.vn/resource/topic/idu/iduhanoisharing.pdf (accessed September 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Wodak A., Cooney A. Effectiveness of sterile needle and syringe programmes. International Journal of Drug Policy 2005; 16S: S31–S44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar