Advanced search
Publication Cover
Cochlear Implants International
An Interdisciplinary Journal for Implantable Hearing Devices
Volume 24, 2023 - Issue 6
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,338
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original articles

Effects of an evidence-based model for cochlear implant aftercare delivery on clinical efficiency and patient outcomes

Sandra L. Porps1 Michigan Ear Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USACorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8858-2241
ORCID Icon,
Danielle M. Bennett1 Michigan Ear Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA
,
Jan Gilden2 Cochlear Hearing Center, Bellaire, TX, USA
,
Kimberly Ravelo3 Texoma Hearing Institute, Wichita Falls, TX, USA
,
Barbara Buck4 Cochlear Americas, Lone Tree, CO, USA
,
Paul Reinhart4 Cochlear Americas, Lone Tree, CO, USA
&
Robert S. Hong1 Michigan Ear Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA
 show all
Pages 325-334 | Published online: 16 Mar 2023

References

  • Bewley, M.S. 2013. Mining clinical databases: A post-hoc study of cochelar implant fitting practices. Cochlear White Paper.
  • Boisvert, I., Reis, M., Au, A., Cowan, R., Dowell, R.C. 2020. Cochlear implantation outcomes in adults: A scoping review. PLoS One, 15(5): e0232421.
  • Browning, L.M., Nie, Y., Rout, A., Heiner, M. 2020. Audiologists’ preferences in programming cochlear implants: A preliminary report. Cochlear Implants International, 21(4): 179–191.
  • Buchman, C.A., Herzog, J.A., McJunkin, J.L., Wick, C.C., Durakovic, N., Firszt, J.B., Kallogjeri, D. 2020. Assessment of speech understanding after cochlear implantation in adult hearing Aid users. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 146(10): 916–924.
  • Deep, N.L., Dowling, E.M., Jethanamest, D., Carlson, M.L. 2019. Cochlear implantation: an overview. Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base, 80(02): 169–177.
  • Dillon, H., James, A., Ginis, J. 1997. Client oriented scale of improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 8(1): 27–40.
  • Dunn, C. 2018, March 7-10. Word recognition and audiometric profiles of cochlear implant candidacy. Emerging issues in cochlear implantation CI2018 meeting, Washington DC, USA.
  • Gifford, R. 2022, May 18-21. The evolution of cochlear implant care: A 25 year review. The American cochlear implant alliance meeting. Washington DC, USA.
  • Grisel, J., Miller, S., Schafer, E.C. 2022. A novel performance-based paradigm of care for cochlear implant follow-Up. The Laryngoscope, 132: S1–S10.
  • Hemmingson, C., Messersmith, J.J. 2018. Cochlear implant practice patterns: The U.S. trends with pediatric patients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 29(08): 722–733.
  • Hughes, M.L., Vander Werff, K.R., Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J., Kelsay, D.M., Teagle, H.F., Lowder, M.W. 2001. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 22(6): 471–486.
  • Kelsall, D., Lupo, J., Biever, A. 2021. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 42(1): 102773.
  • Maruthurkkara, S., Allen, A., Cullington, H., Muff, J., Arora, K., & Johnson, S. (2022). Remote check test battery for cochlear implant recipients: Proof of concept study. International Journal of Audiology, 61(6), 443-452.
  • Messersmith, J.J., Entwisle, L., Warren, S., Scott, M. 2019. Clinical practice guidelines: cochlear implants. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 30(10): 827–844.
  • Müller, J., Raine, C.H. 2013. Quality standards for adult cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants International, 14(sup2): S6–S12.
  • Nassiri, A. M., Marinelli, J. P., Sorkin, D. L., & Carlson, M. L. (2021). Barriers to adult cochlear implant care in the United States: an analysis of health care delivery. Seminars in Hearing, 42(4): 311-320.
  • Shapiro, W.H., Bradham, T.S. 2012. Cochlear implant programming. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 45(1): 111–127.
  • Shapiro, S.B., Lipschitz, N., Kemper, N., Abdelrehim, L., Hammer, T., Wenstrup, L., et al. 2021. Real-world compliance with follow-up in 2,554 cochlear implant recipients: An analysis of the HERMES database. Otology & Neurotology, 42(1): 47–50.
  • Studebaker, G.A. 1985. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 28(3): 455–462.
  • Thornton, A.R., Raffin, M.J. 1978. Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21(3): 507–518.
  • Vaerenberg, B., Smits, C., De Ceulaer, G., Zir, E., Harman, S., Jaspers, N., … Govaerts, P.J. 2014. Cochlear implant programming: a global survey on the state of the art. The Scientific World Journal, 2014: 1–12.
  • Varadarajan, V.V., Sydlowski, S.A., Li, M.M., Anne, S., Adunka, O.F. 2021. Evolving criteria for adult and pediatric cochlear implantation. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal, 100(1): 31–37.
  • Waltzman, S.B., Kelsall, D.C. 2020. The Use of artificial intelligence to program cochlear implants. Otology & Neurotology, 41(4): 452–457.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.