Comprehension of clitic pronouns by children with cochlear implants: the role of sentence stress

References

• ABEP - Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa [Brazilian Association of Research Companies]. 2008. CCEB - Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil [Brazilian Economic Classification Criterion]. Available at: http://www.abep.org
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 1997. Guidelines for Audiologic Screening [Guidelines]. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/policy
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R.T. 1998. The development of grammatical case distinctions in the use of personal pronouns by spanish-speaking preschoolers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(2): 394–406. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4102.394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. 2018. Essentials of linguistics. McMaster University. https://essentialsoflinguistics.pressbooks.com/front-matter/introduction/.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, C.F., Befi-Lopes, D.M., Fernandes, F.D., Wetzner, H.F. 2004. ABFW: teste de linguagem lnfantil nas áreas de fonologia, vocabulário, fluência e pragmática [ABFW: Child language test on the areas of phonology, vocabulary, fluency, and pragmatics], 2nd ed.. Barueri: Pro Fono.
   Google Scholar
• Arosio, F., Branchini, C., Barbieri, L., Guasti, M.T. 2014. Failure to produce direct object clitic pronouns as a clinical marker of SLI in school-aged Italian speaking children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 28(9): 639–663. doi:10.3109/02699206.2013.877081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models usinglme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blamey, P.J., Sarant, J.Z., Paatsch, L.E., Barry, J.G., Bow, C.P., Wales, R.J., et al. 2001. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(2): 264–285. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/022)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., Weenink, D. 2013. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.51, retrieved 2 June 2013 from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Boons, T., De raeve, L., Langereis, M., Peeraer, L., Wouters, J., Van wieringen, A. 2013. Expressive vocabulary, morphology, syntax and narrative skills in profoundly deaf children after early cochlear implantation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(6): 2008–2022. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolini, U., Arfé, B., Caselli, C.M., Degasperi, L., Deevy, P., Leonard, L.B. 2006. Clinical markers for specific language impairment in Italian: The contribution of clitics and non-word repetition. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41(6): 695–712. doi:10.1080/13682820600570831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L., Sherbenou, R.J., Johnson, S.K. 2010. TONI-4: test of nonverbal intelligence, 4th ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Coene, M., Govaerts, P., Rooryck, J., Daemers, K. 2010. The role of low-frequency hearing in the acquisition of morphology. Cochlear Implants International, 11(sup1): 272–277. doi:10.1179/146701010X12671177989156
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. 1986. An introduction to English prosody. Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., Xu rattanasone, N., Davis, A., Demuth, K. 2020. The acquisition of productive plural morphology by children with hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(2): 552–568. doi:10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De clerck, I., Verhoeven, J., Gillis, S., Pettinato, M., Gillis, S. 2019. Listeners’ perception of lexical stress in the first words of infants with cochlear implants and normally hearing infants. Journal of Communication Disorders, 80: 52–65. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deroche, M.L.D., Lu, H.-P., Lin, Y.-S., Chatterjee, M., Peng, S.-C. 2019. Processing of acoustic information in lexical tone production and perception by pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezeizabarrena, M.J. 1997. Morfemas de concordancia con el sujeto y con los objetos en el castellano infantil. Contemporary Perspectives on the Acquisition of Spanish, 1: 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Fortunato-Tavares, T., Andrade, C.R.F., Befi-lopes, D., Limongi, S.O., Fernandes, F.D.M., Schwartz, R.G. 2015. Syntactic comprehension and working memory in children with specific language impairment, autism or down syndrome. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 29(7): 499–522. doi:10.3109/02699206.2015.1027831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato-tavares, T., Befi-lopes, D., Bento, R.F., De andrade, C.R.F. 2012. Children with cochlear implants: communication skills and quality of life. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 78(1): 15–25. doi:10.1590/S1808-86942012000100003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato-tavares, T., Howell, P., Schwartz, R.G., De andrade, C.R.F. 2017. Children who stutter exchange linguistic accuracy for processing speed in sentence comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(2): 263–287. doi:10.1017/S0142716416000187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato-tavares, T., Schwartz, R.G., Marton, K., De andrade, C.F., Houston, D. 2018. Prosodic boundary effects on syntactic disambiguation in children with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(5): 1188–1202. doi:10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers, A.E., Nicholas, J.G., Sedey, A.L. 2003. Language skills of children with early cochlear implantation. Ear and Hearing, 24(Supplement): 46S–58S. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000051689.57380.1B
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giustolisi, B., Guasti, M.T., Nicastri, M., Mancini, P., Palma, S., Genovese, E., Arosio, F. 2021. Production of third-person direct object clitics in children with cochlear implants speaking Italian. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 35(6): 577–591. doi:10.1080/02699206.2020.1803406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golestani, S.D., Jalilevand, N., Kamali, M. 2018. A comparison of morpho-syntactic abilities in deaf children with cochlear implant and 5-year-old normal-hearing children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 110: 27–30. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.04.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guasti, M.T., Papagno, C., Vernice, M., Cecchetto, C., Giuliani, A., Burdo, S. 2014. The effect of language structure on linguistic strengths and weaknesses in children with cochlear implants: evidence from Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(4): 739–764. doi:10.1017/S0142716412000562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, L., Faulkner, A. 2013. The perception of stress and intonation in children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid. Cochlear Implants International, 14(sup4): 35–39. doi:10.1179/1467010013Z.000000000132
   Google Scholar
• Holt, C.M., Lee, K.Y.S., Dowell, R.C., Vogel, A.P. 2018. Perception of cantonese lexical tones by pediatric cochlear implant users. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(1): 174–185. doi:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, C.M., Mcdermott, H.J. 2013. Discrimination of intonation contours by adolescents with cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology, 52(12): 808–815. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.832416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson-maldonado, D., Maldonado, R. 2017. Grammaticality differences between spanish-speaking children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 52(6): 750–765. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le normand, M.-T., Ouellet, C., Cohen, H. 2003. Productivity of lexical categories in French-speaking children with cochlear implants. Brain and Cognition, 53(2): 257–262. doi:10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00122-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, L.B., Dispaldro, M. 2013. The effects of production demands on grammatical weaknesses in specific language impairment: the case of clitic pronouns in Italian. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 56(4): 12721286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, G., Soli, S.D., Zheng, Y. 2017a. Tone perception in mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology, 56(sup2): S49–S59. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1324643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyxell, B., Wass, M., SahlÉn, B., Samuelsson, C., Asker-Árnason, L., Ibertsson, T., et al. 2009. Cognitive development, Reading and prosodic skills in children with cochlear implants. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(5): 463–474. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00754.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal, J.C., Kumar, S., Roy, S. 2016. Comparison of auditory comprehension skills in children with cochlear implant and typically developing children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 91: 113–120. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moein, N., Khoddami, S.M., Shahbodaghi, M.R. 2017. A comparison of speech intonation production and perception abilities of farsi speaking cochlear implanted and normal hearing children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 101: 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.07.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, S.-C., Lu, H.-P., Lu, N., Lin, Y.-S., Deroche, M.L.D., Chatterjee, M. 2017. Processing of acoustic cues in lexical-tone identification by pediatric cochlear-implant recipients. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(5): 1223–1235. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettinato, M., Clerck, I., De Verhoeven, J., Gillis, S. 2017. Expansion of prosodic abilities at the transition from babble to words: A comparison between children with cochlear implants and normally hearing children. Ear & Hearing, 38(4): 475–486. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, P. (2000). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruder, C.C. 2004. Grammatical morpheme development in young cochlear implant users. International Congress Series, 1273: 320–323. doi:10.1016/j.ics.2004.08.033
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, A., Speer, S., Warren, P. 2005. Prosodic influences on the production and comprehension of syntactic ambiguity in a game-based conversation task. In: M. Tanenhaus, J. Trueswell, (eds.) Approaches to studying world situated language Use, p. 209–255. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, A., Speer, S.R., Warren, P., White, S.D. 2000. Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29: 169–182. doi:10.1023/A:1005192911512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn, J.B., Chermak, G.D., Musiek, F.E. 2009. GIN (gaps-In-noise) performance in the pediatric population. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 20(04): 229–238. doi:10.3766/jaaa.20.4.3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snedeker, J., Casserly, E. 2010. Is it all relative? effects of prosodic boundaries on the comprehension and production of attachment ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7-9): 1234–1264. doi:10.1080/01690960903525499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svirsky, M.A., Robbins, A.M., Kirk, K.I., Pisoni, D.B., Miyamoto, R.T. 2000. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychological Science, 11(2): 153–158. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svirsky, M.A., Stallings, L.M., Ying, E., Lento, C.L., Leonard, L.B. 2002. Grammatical morphologic development in pediatric cochlear implant users may be affected by the perceptual prominence of the relevant markers. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 111(5_suppl): 109–112. doi:10.1177/00034894021110S522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szagun, G. 2004. Learning by ear: On the acquisition of case and gender marking by German-speaking children with normal hearing and with cochlear implants. Journal of Child Language, 31(1): 1–30. doi:10.1017/S0305000903005889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedeschi, R. 2009. Language acquisition at the interfaces. A case study on object clitics in early Italian. Utrecht: LOT-Dissertation Series 218.
   Google Scholar
• Torppa, R., Faulkner, A., Huotilainen, M., Järvikivi, J., Lipsanen, J., Laasonen, M., Vainio, M. 2014. The perception of prosody and associated auditory cues in early-implanted children: The role of auditory working memory and musical activities. International Journal of Audiology, 53(3): 182–191. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.872302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Lely, H.K.J. 1998. SLI in children: movement, economy and deficits in the computational-syntactic system. Language Acquisition, 7: 161–192.
   Google Scholar
• Van der lely, H.K., Stollwerck, L. 1997. Binding theory and grammatical specific language impairment in children. Cognition, 62(3): 245–290. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00783-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de velde, D.J., Schiller, N.O., Levelt, C.C., Van heuven, V.J., Beers, M., Briaire, J.J., Frijns, J.H.M. 2019. Prosody perception and production by children with cochlear implants. Journal of Child Language, 46(1): 111–141. doi:10.1017/S0305000918000387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler, K., Gavarró, A., Torrens, V. 2004. Current issues in linguistic theory. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 256.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J., Schafer, E.C. 2010. Programming cochlear implants. San Diego, CA: Plural.
   Google Scholar