The felt sense of performance: affective meaning at the edge of words

References

• Benedetto, S. D. 2010. The Provocation of the Senses in Contemporary Theatre. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bleeker, M., J. F. Sherman, and E. Nedelkopoulou, eds. 2015. Performance and Phenomenology: Traditions and Transformations. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. 1996. Performance. A Critical Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, J. 2005. Utopia in Performance. Finding Hope at the Theatre. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Féral, J., and E. Perrot. 2012. “De La Présence Aux Effets De Présence. Écarts Et Enjeux.” In Pratiques Performatives: Body Remix, edited by J. Féral, 11–40. Montreal: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer-Lichte, E. 2008. The Transformative Power of Performance. A New Aesthetics. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gendlin, E., and M. Hendricks. 2004. “Thinking at the Edge (TAE) Steps.” The Folio 19: 12–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gendlin, E. 1992. “The Primacy of the Body, Not the Primacy of Perception.” Man and World 25 (3–4): 341–353. doi:10.1007/BF01252424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendlin, E. 2004. “Introduction to Thinking at the Edge.” The Folio 19: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gendlin, E. 2006. “Transcript of Gendlin Templeton Lecture. Psychology of Trust and Feeling Conference. Stony Brook University.” http://previous.focusing.org/gendlin/docs/gol_2178.html
   Google Scholar
• Gendlin, E. 2017. A Process Model. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gendlin, G. interviewed by Lynn Preston. 2007. “Beyond Words: The Implicit.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k25EsOCv7k4
   Google Scholar
• Grant, S., J. McNeilly, and M. Wagner, eds. 2019. Performance Phenomenology: To The Thing Itself. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, S. 2012. “Genealogies and Methodologies of Phenomenology in Theatre and Performance Studies.” Nordic Theatre Studies 24: 8–20. doi:10.7146/nts.v24i1.114826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvie, J. 2013. Fair Play: Art, Performance and Neoliberalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, E., and S. Warner. 2012. “Special Section: ‘Affect/Performance/Politics.’.” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 26 (2): 99–107. doi:10.1353/dtc.2012.0000.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, E. 2010. Theatre & Feeling. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, M. 1972. “On Acting and Not-Acting.” TDR 16 (1): 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kozel, S. 2007. Closer: Performance, Technologies, Phenomenology. Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., and M. Jonhson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maciel, A. 2020. “The Ground of the Cities - Performance as Catalysis.” Studies in Theatre and Performance 40 (1): 35–43. doi:10.1080/14682761.2019.1676020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConachie, B. 2011. “An Evolutionary Perspective on Play, Performance, and Ritual.” TDR/The Drama Review 55 (4): 33–50. doi:10.1162/DRAM_a_00120.
   Google Scholar
• Pais, A. 2016. “Re-Affecting the Stage: Affective Resonance as the Function of the Audience.” Humanities 5: 79. doi:10.3390/h5030079.
   Google Scholar
• Pavis, P. 1998. Dictionary of the Theatre: Terms, Concepts and Analysis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ridout, N. 2006. Stage Fright, Animals and Other Theatrical Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ridout, N. 2008. “Welcome to the Vibratorium.” Senses & Society 3 (2): 221–231. doi:10.2752/174589308X306448.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, J. 1985. The Player’s Passion. Studies in the Science of Acting. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schechner, R. 2013. Performance Studies – An Introduction. 3rd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeller, D., and N. Dunaetz. 2018. “Thinking Emergence as Interaffecting: Approaching and Contextualizing Eugene Gendlin’s Process Model.” Contemporary Philosophy Review 51: 123–140. doi:10.1007/s11007-018-9437-9.
   Google Scholar
• Sheets-Johnstone, M. 1966. The Phenomenology of Dance. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• States, B. O. 1985. Great Reckonings in Little Rooms: On the Phenomenology of Theatre. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. 1985. The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, P. 2002. Performing Emotions: Gender, Bodies, Spaces in Chekhov’s Drama and Stanislavsky’s Theatre. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, P. 2021. Theory for Theatre Studies: Emotion. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J., and A. Stuart Fisher, eds. 2020. Performing Care: New Perspectives on Socially Engaged Performance. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. 2009. Performance Affects. Applied Theatre and the End of Effect. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Welton, M., and C. Déchery. 2020. “Staging Atmospheres: Editorial Introduction to the First Volume.” Ambiences 6. doi:10.4000/ambiances.3387.
   Google Scholar
• Welton, M. 2012. Feeling Theatre. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Zarrilli, P. 2020. (Toward) a Phenomenology of Acting. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar