1,416
Views
97
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

The role of novel biomarker HE4 in the diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of ovarian cancer: a systematic review

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 827-839 | Received 31 Aug 2016, Accepted 24 Jul 2017, Published online: 03 Aug 2017

References

  • Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30.
  • Havrilesky LJ, Whitehead CM, Rubatt JM, et al. Evaluation of biomarker panels for early stage ovarian cancer detection and monitoring for disease recurrence. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110:374–382.
  • Van Gorp T, Cadron I, Despierre E, et al. HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:863–870.
  • Anastasi E, Marchei GG, Viggiani V, et al. HE4: a new potential early biomarker for the recurrence of ovarian cancer. Tumour Biol. 2010;31:113–119.
  • Ferraro S, Braga F, Lanzoni M, et al. Serum human epididymis protein 4 vs. carbohydrate antigen 125 for ovarian cancer diagnosis: a systematic review. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66:273–281.
  • Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2 Group: QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529–536.
  • Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews of evaluation of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, editors. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Publishing; 2001. p. 248–282.
  • Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: dataanalytic approaches and some considerations. Sta Med. 1993;12:1293–1316.
  • Dong L, Chang XH, Ye X, et al. The values of serum human epididymis secretory protein 4 and CA(125) assay in the diagnosis of ovarian malignancy. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008;43:931–936.
  • Montagnana M, Lippi G, Ruzzenente O, et al. The utility of serum Human Epididymis Protein 4 (HE4) in patients with a pelvic mass. J Clin Lab Anal. 2009;23:331–335.
  • Shah CA, Lowe KA, Paley P, et al. Influence of ovarian cancer risk status on the diagnostic performance of the serum biomarkers mesothelin, HE4, and CA125. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 May;18(5):1365–1372. DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1034
  • Abdel-Azeez HA, Labib HA, Sharaf SM, et al. HE4 and mesothelin: novel biomarkers of ovarian carcinoma inpatients with pelvic masses. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11:111–116.
  • Andersen MR, Goff BA, Lowe KA, et al. Use of a symptom index, CA125, and HE4 to predict ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116:378–383.
  • Escudero JM, Auge JM, Filella X, et al. Comparison of serum human epididymis protein 4 with cancer antigen 125 as a tumor marker in patients with malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Clin Chem. 2011;57:1534–1544.
  • Korse CM, Bonfrer JMG, Van Beurden M, et al. The diagnostic and prognostic value of HE4 and CA125 in ovarian cancer patients. In: Tumor biology. 2010. p. s111–s111.
  • Liu YN, Ye X, Cheng HY, et al. Measurement of serum human epididymis secretory protein 4 combined with CA125 assay in differential diagnosis of endometriosis cyst and ovarian benign and malignant tumors. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2010;45:363–366.
  • Nolen B, Velikokhatnaya L, Marrangoni A, et al. Serum biomarker panels for the discrimination of benign from malignant cases in patients with an adnexal mass. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;117(3):440–445.
  • Baba DU, Ugur M, Gungor T, et al. Clinical importance of Human Epidydimis Protein-4 (He4) in predicting malignancy potentials of adnexial masses. In: European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO 2011). Milan; 2011 Nov 15. p. 6–6.
  • Bandiera E, Romani C, Specchia C, et al. Serum human epididymis protein 4 and risk for ovarian malignancy algorithm as new diagnostic and prognostic tools for epithelial ovarian cancer management. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:2496–2506.
  • Chang X, Ye X, Dong L, et al. Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) as a serum tumor biomarker in patients with ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21:852–858.
  • Cramer DW, Bast RC Jr, Berg CD, et al. Ovarian cancer biomarker performance in prostate, lung, colorectal,and ovarian cancer screening trial specimens. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011;4:365–374.
  • Franchi D, Sandri M, Boveri S, et al. Ultrasound imaging compared to a multivariate predictive algorithm combining HE4 and CA 125 (ROMA) in the pre-operative assessment of adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:1–55.
  • Granatova J, Boirecka K, Tuma J, et al. He4: A novel tumor marker in differential diagnostics of ovarian cancer. In: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Vol. 49 SUPPL 1. 2011. p. S240.
  • Kim YM, Whang DH, Park J, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of serum human epididymis protein 4 in combination with CA125 for detecting ovarian cancer: a prospective case-control study in a Korean population. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Mar;49(3):527–534. Epub 2011 Feb 15. DOI:10.1515/CCLM.2011.085
  • Lenhard M, Stieber P, Hertlein L, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of two human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) testing systems in combination with CA125 in the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:2081–2088.
  • Modares-Gilani M, Ghaemmaghami F, Mousavi A, et al. Simultaneous measurement of two serum markers (CA-125 and HE-4) while diagnosing malignant ovarian epithelial tumors. Pak J Med Sci. 2011;4:858–861.
  • Molina R, Escudero JM, Auge JM, et al. HE4 a novel tumour marker for ovarian cancer: comparison with CA 125 and ROMA algorithm in patients with gynaecological diseases. Tumour Biol. 2011;32:1087–1095.
  • Montagnana M, Danese E, Ruzzenente O, et al. The ROMA (Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm) for estimating the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women presenting with pelvic mass: is it really useful? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Mar;49(3):521–525. Epub 2011 Feb 3. DOI:10.1515/CCLM.2011.075
  • Park Y, Lee JH, Hong DJ, et al. Diagnostic performances of HE4 and CA125 for the detection of ovarian cancer from patients with various gynecologic and non-gynecologic diseases. Clin Biochem. 2011 Jul;44(10–11):884–888. Epub 2011 Apr 22. DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.04.011
  • Ruggeri G, Bandiera E, Zanotti L, et al. HE4 and epithelial ovarian cancer: comparison and clinical evaluation of two immunoassays and a combination algorithm. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412:1447Y1453.
  • Yip P, Chen TH, Seshaiah P, et al. Comprehensive serum profiling for the discovery of epithelial ovarian cancer biomarkers. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e29533. Epub 2011 Dec 21. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0029533
  • Partheen K, Kristjansdottir B, Sundfeldt K, et al. Evaluation of ovarian cancer biomarkers HE4 and CA-125 in women presenting with a suspicious cystic ovarian mass. J Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Dec;22(4):244–252. Epub 2011 Dec 5. DOI:10.3802/jgo.2011.22.4.244
  • Anton C, Carvalho FM, Oliveira EI, et al. A comparison of CA125, HE4, risk ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA), and risk malignancy index (RMI) for the classification of ovarian masses. Clinics. 2012;67:437–441.
  • Freydanck MK, Laubender RP, Rack B, et al. Two-marker combinations for preoperative discrimination of benign and malignant ovarian masses. Anticancer Res. 2012;32:2003–2008.
  • He G, Holcroft CA, Beauchamp MC, et al. Combination of serum biomarkers to differentiate malignant from benign ovarian tumours. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34:567–574.
  • Jacob F, Meier M, Caduff R, et al. No benefit from combining HE4 and CA125 as ovarian tumor markers in a clinical setting. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121:487–491.
  • Kadija S, Stefanovic A, Jeremic K, et al. The utility of human epididymal protein 4, cancer antigen 125, and risk for malignancy algorithm in ovarian cancer and endometriosis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Feb;22(2):238–244. DOI:10.1097/IGC.0b013e318234f852
  • Karlsen MA, Sandhu N, Høgdall C, et al. Evaluation of HE4, CA125, risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) and risk of malignancy index (RMI) as diagnostic tools of epithelial ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Nov;127(2):379–383. Epub 2012 Jul 24. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.07.106
  • Zheng H, Gao Y. Serum HE4 as a useful biomarker in discriminating ovarian cancer from benign pelvic disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Jul;22(6):1000–1005. DOI:10.1097/IGC.0b013e318249bee7
  • Li K, Yang Y, Li-Zhen H, et al. Significance of combined determination of serum HE4 CA125 level and T lymphocyte subgroups in peripheral blood in early diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Chin J Biologicals. 2012;25:99Y101.
  • Novotny Z, Presl J, Kucera R, et al. HE4 and ROMA index in Czech postmenopausal women. Anticancer Res. 2012 Sep;32(9):4137–4140.
  • Park Y, Kim Y, Lee EY, et al. Reference ranges for HE4 and CA125 in a large Asian population by automated assays and diagnostic performances for ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer. 2012 Mar 1;130(5):1136–1144. Epub 2011 Jun 14. DOI:10.1002/ijc.26129
  • Azzam AZ, Hashad DI, Kamel NA. Evaluation of HE4 as an extrabiomarker to CA125 to improve detection of ovarian carcinoma: is it time for a step forward? Arch Gynecol Obstet [Abstracts]. 2013;288:167–172.
  • Chan KK, Chen CA, Nam JH, et al. The use of HE4 in the prediction of ovarian cancer in Asian women with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;128:239–244.
  • Hamed EO, Ahmed H, Sedeek OB, et al. Significance of HE4 estimation in comparison with CA125 in diagnosis of ovarian cancer and assessment of treatment response. Diagn Pathol [Abstract]. 2013;8:11.
  • Sandri MT, Bottari F, Franchi D, et al. Comparison of HE4, CA125 and ROMA algorithm in women with a pelvic mass: correlation with pathological outcome. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Feb;128(2):233–238. Epub 2012 Nov 28. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.026
  • Fujiwara H, Suzuki M, Takeshima N, et al. Evaluation of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) as diagnostic tools of type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer in Japanese women. Tumour Biol. 2015 Feb;36(2):1045–1053. Epub 2014 Oct 19. DOI:10.1007/s13277-014-2738-7
  • Cho HY, Park SH, Park YH, et al. Comparison of HE4, CA125, and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm in the prediction of ovarian cancer in Korean women. J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Dec;30(12):1777–1783. Epub 2015 Nov 30. DOI:10.3346/jkms.2015.30.12.1777
  • Zhang P, Wang C, Cheng L, et al. Comparison of HE4, CA125, and ROMA diagnostic accuracy: a prospective and multicenter study for Chinese women with epithelial ovarian cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Dec;94(52):e2402. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000002402
  • Romagnolo C, Leon AE, Fabricio AS, et al. HE4, CA125 and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) as diagnostic tools for ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass: an Italian multicenter study. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 May;141(2):303–311. Epub 2016 Jan 19. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.01.016
  • Zhao T, Hu W. CA125 and HE4: measurement tools for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2016 Apr 29;81:430–435. [Epub ahead of print].
  • Yanaranop M, Anakrat V, Siricharoenthai S, et al. Is the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm better than other tests for predicting ovarian malignancy in women with pelvic masses? Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2017;82(1):47–53.
  • Li L, Wan J, Cai G, et al. Value of serum human epididymis secretory protein 4 as a marker for differential diagnosis of malignant and benign gynecological diseases of patients in southern China. Clin Chim Acta. 2016 Aug 1;459:170–176. Epub 2016 Jun 11. DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2016.06.010
  • Wei SU, Li H, Zhang B. The diagnostic value of serum HE4 and CA-125 and ROMA index in ovarian cancer. Biomed Rep. 2016 Jul;5(1):41–44. Epub 2016 May 19.
  • Terlikowska KM, Dobrzycka B, Witkowska AM, et al. Preoperative HE4, CA125 and ROMA in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant adnexal masses. J Ovarian Res. 2016 Jul 19;9(1):43. DOI:10.1186/s13048-016-0254-7
  • Paek J, Lee SH, Yim GW, et al. Prognostic significance of human epididymis protein 4 in epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Oct;158(2):338–342. Epub 2011 Jun 17. DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.05.021
  • Hynninen J, Auranen A, Dean K, et al. HE4 profile during primary chemotherapy of epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 Dec;21(9):1573–1578. DOI:10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182225509
  • Kong SY, Han MH, Yoo HJ, et al. Serum HE4 level is an independent prognostic factor in epithelial ovarian cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 May;19(5):1707–1712. Epub 2011 Jul 21. DOI:10.1245/s10434-011-1943-5
  • Kalapotharakos G, Asciutto C, Henic E, et al. High preoperative blood levels of HE4 predicts poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res. 2012 Aug 21;5(1):20. DOI:10.1186/1757-2215-5-20
  • Trudel D, Têtu B, Grégoire J, et al. Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and ovarian cancer prognosis. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Dec;127(3):511–515. Epub 2012 Sep 9. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.09.003
  • Steffensen KD, Waldstrøm M, Brandslund I, et al. The prognostic and predictive value of combined HE4 and CA-125 in ovarian cancer patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Nov;22(9):1474–1482. DOI:10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182681cfd
  • Braicu EI, Fotopoulou C, Van Gorp T, et al. Preoperative HE4 expression in plasma predicts surgical outcome in primary ovarian cancer patients: results from the OVCAD study. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Feb;128(2):245–251. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
  • Angioli R, Plotti F, Capriglione S, et al. Can the preoperative HE4 level predict optimal cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma? Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Mar;128(3):579–583. Epub 2012 Dec 7. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.040
  • Yang Z, Luo Z, Zhao B, et al. Diagnosis and preoperative predictive value of serum HE4 concentrations for optimal debulking in epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncol Lett. 2013 Jul;6(1):28–34. Epub 2013 May 8.
  • Braicu EI, Chekerov R, Richter R, et al. HE4 expression in plasma correlates with surgical outcome and overall survival in patients with first ovarian cancer relapse. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;21(3):955–962. Epub 2013 Nov 12. DOI:10.1245/s10434-013-3347-1
  • Chen WT, Gao X, Han XD, et al. HE4 as a serum biomarker for ROMA prediction and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(1):101–105.
  • Angioli R, Capriglione S, Aloisi A, et al. Can HE4 predict platinum response during first-line chemotherapy in ovarian cancer? Tumour Biol. 2014 Jul;35(7):7009–7015. Epub 2014 Apr 21. DOI:10.1007/s13277-014-1836-x
  • Kaijser J, Van Belle V, Van Gorp T, et al. Prognostic value of serum HE4 levels and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm scores at the time of ovarian cancer diagnosis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Sep;24(7):1173–1180. DOI:10.1097/IGC.0000000000000181
  • Chudecka-Głaz AM, Cymbaluk-Płoska AA, Menkiszak JL, et al. Serum HE4, CA125, YKL-40, bcl-2, cathepsin-L and prediction optimal debulking surgery, response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res. 2014 Jun 10;7:62. eCollection 2014. DOI:10.1186/1757-2215-7-62
  • Vallius T, Hynninen J, Auranen A, et al. Serum HE4 and CA125 as predictors of response and outcome during neoadjuvant chemotherapy of advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Tumour Biol. 2014 Dec;35(12):12389–12395. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
  • Angioli R, Capriglione S, Aloisi A, et al. A predictive score for secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer (SeC-Score): a single-centre, controlled study for preoperative patient selection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22(13):4217–4223. Epub 2015 Mar 26. DOI:10.1245/s10434-015-4534-z
  • Tang Z, Chang X, Ye X, et al. Usefulness of human epididymis protein 4 in predicting cytoreductive surgical outcomes for advanced ovarian tubal and peritoneal carcinoma. Chin J Cancer Res. 2015 Jun;27(3):309–317. DOI:10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.06.01
  • Nassir M, Guan J, Luketina H, et al. The role of HE4 for prediction of recurrence in epithelial ovarian cancer patients-results from the OVCAD study. Tumour Biol. 2016 Mar;37(3):3009–3016. Epub 2015 Sep 29. DOI:10.1007/s13277-015-4031-9
  • Steffensen KD, Waldstrøm M, Brandslund I, et al. Identification of high-risk patients by human epididymis protein 4 levels during follow-up of ovarian cancer. Oncol Lett. 2016 Jun;11(6):3967–3974. Epub 2016 May 6.
  • Schummer M, Drescher C, Forrest R, et al. Evaluation of ovarian cancer remission markers HE4, MMP7 and mesothelin by comparison to the established marker CA125. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125:65–69.
  • Granato T, Midulla C, Longo F, et al. Role of HE4, CA72.4, and CA125 in monitoring ovarian cancer. Tumour Biol. 2012;33:1335–1339.
  • Plotti F, Capriglione S, Terranova C, et al. Does HE4 have a role as biomarker in the recurrence of ovarian cancer? Tumour Biol. 2012;33:2117–2123.
  • Manganaro L, Michienzi S, Vinci V, et al. Serum HE4 levels combined with CE CT imaging improve the management of monitoring women affected by epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncol Rep. 2013;30:2481–2487.
  • Clarke-Pearson DL. Clinical practice. Screening for ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:170–177.
  • American College of O, Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic P. Committee Opinion No. 477: the role of the obstetrician-gynecologist in the early detection of epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:742–746.
  • Smith RA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Brooks D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: a review of current American cancer society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:30–54.
  • Buys SS, et al. Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening randomized controlled trial. Jama. 2011;305:2295–2303.
  • Moyer VA, Force USPST. Screening for ovarian cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:900–904.
  • Schorge JO, Modesitt SC, Coleman RL, et al. SGO white paper on ovarian cancer: etiology, screening and surveillance. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119:7–17.
  • Brown DL, Andreotti RF, Lee SI, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria(c) ovarian cancer screening. Ultrasound. 2010;26:219–223.
  • Sharma A, Apostolidou S, Burnell M, et al. Risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in asymptomatic women with ultrasound-detected ovarian masses: a prospective cohort study within the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40:338–344.
  • Jacobs IJ, Menon U, Ryan A, et al. Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:945–956.
  • Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Hallett R, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:327–340.
  • Hellström I, Rayeraft J, Hayden-Ledbetter M, et al. The HE4 (WFDC2) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3695–3700.
  • Buamah P. Benign conditions associated with raised serum CA-125 concentration. J Surg Oncol. 2000;75:264–265.
  • Lin JY, Qin JB, Li XY, et al. Diagnostic value of human epididymis protein 4 compared with mesothelin for ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13:5427–5432.
  • Wu L, Dai ZY, Qian YH, et al. Diagnostic value of serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22:1106–1112.
  • Lin J, Qin J, Sangvatanakul V. Human epididymis protein 4 for differential diagnosis between benign gynecologic disease and ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;167(1):81–85.
  • Moore RG, Bast RC Jr. How do you distinguish a malignant pelvic mass from a benign pelvic mass? Imaging, biomarkers, or none of the above. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4159–4161.
  • Rustin G, Van Der Burg M, Griffin C, et al., MRC OV05; EORTC 55955 investigators. Early versus delayed treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer (MRC OV05/EORTC 55955): a randomized trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1155–1163.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.