2,538
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Improving postoperative radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy

, &
Pages 925-937 | Received 30 May 2017, Accepted 04 Aug 2017, Published online: 17 Aug 2017

References

  • Roach M 3rd, Ceron Lizarraga TL, Lazar AA. Radical prostatectomy versus radiation and androgen deprivation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: how good is the evidence? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;93:1064–1070.
  • Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al. 10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1415–1424.
  • Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:382–404.
  • Boorjian SA, Eastham JA, Graefen M, et al. A critical analysis of the long-term impact of radical prostatectomy on cancer control and function outcomes. Eur Urol. 2012;61:664–675.
  • Wilson T, Torrey R. Open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better? Curr Opin Urol. 2011;21:200–205.
  • Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, et al. Death in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: prostate-specific antigen doubling time subgroups and their associated contributions to all-cause mortality. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1765–1771.
  • Cher ML, Bianco FJ Jr., Lam JS, et al. Limited role of radionuclide bone scintigraphy in patients with prostate specific antigen elevations after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 1998;160:1387–1391.
  • Thomas CT, Bradshaw PT, Pollock BH, et al. Indium-111-capromab pendetide radioimmunoscintigraphy and prognosis for durable biochemical response to salvage radiation therapy in men after failed prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1715–1721.
  • Leventis AK, Shariat SF, Slawin KM. Local recurrence after radical prostatectomy: correlation of US features with prostatic fossa biopsy findings. Radiology. 2001;219:432–439.
  • Koppie TM, Grossfeld GD, Nudell DM, et al. Is anastomotic biopsy necessary before radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy? J Urol. 2001;166:111–115.
  • Swanson GP, Lerner SP. Positive margins after radical prostatectomy: implications for failure and role of adjuvant treatment. Urol Oncol. 2013;31:531–541.
  • Han M, Partin AW, Chan DY, et al. An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series. J Urol. 2004;171:23–26.
  • Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, et al. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:1–15.
  • Sooriakumaran P, Dev HS, Skarecky D, et al. The importance of surgical margins in prostate cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:310–315.
  • Sakr WA, Wheeler TM, Blute M, et al. Staging and reporting of prostate cancer–sampling of the radical prostatectomy specimen. Cancer. 1996;78:366–368.
  • van der Kwast TH, Collette L, van Poppel H, et al. Impact of pathology review of stage and margin status of radical prostatectomy specimens (EORTC trial 22911). Virchows Arch. 2006;449:428–434.
  • Fontenot PA, Mansour AM. Reporting positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: time for standardization. BJU Int. 2013;111:E290–E299.
  • Saether T, Sorlien LT, Viset T, et al. Are positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens an independent prognostic marker? Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008;42:514–521.
  • Jayachandran J, Banez LL, Levy DE, et al. Risk stratification for biochemical recurrence in men with positive surgical margins or extracapsular disease after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database. J Urol. 2008;179:1791–6; discussion 1796.
  • Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Manfredi M, et al. Surgical margin status of specimen and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 400 procedures. World J Urol. 2012;30:245–250.
  • Simon MA, Kim S, Soloway MS. Prostate specific antigen recurrence rates are low after radical retropubic prostatectomy and positive margins. J Urol. 2006;175:140–145.
  • Kordan Y, Salem S, Chang SS, et al. Impact of positive apical surgical margins on likelihood of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2009;182:2695–2701.
  • Stephenson AJ, Wood DP, Kattan MW, et al. Location, extent and number of positive surgical margins do not improve accuracy of predicting prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2009;182:1357–1363.
  • Savdie R, Horvath LG, Benito RP, et al. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy. BJU Int. 2012;109:1794–1800.
  • Shikanov S, Song J, Royce C, et al. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence. J Urol. 2009;182:139–144.
  • Godoy G, Tareen BU, Lepor H. Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2009;104:1610–1614.
  • Pfitzenmaier J, Pahernik S, Tremmel T, et al. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression? BJU Int. 2008;102:1413–1418.
  • Somford DM, van Oort IM, Cosyns JP, et al. Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2012;30:105–110.
  • May M, Brookman-May S, Weissbach L, et al. Solitary and small (</=3 mm) apical positive surgical margins are related to biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol. 2011;18:282–289.
  • Boorjian SA, Tollefson MK, Rangel LJ, et al. Clinicopathological predictors of systemic progression and prostate cancer mortality in patients with a positive surgical margin at radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012;15:56–62.
  • Ploussard G, Agamy MA, Alenda O, et al. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naive patients. BJU Int. 2011;107:1748–1754.
  • Hsu M, Chang SL, Ferrari M, et al. Length of site-specific positive surgical margins as a risk factor for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol. 2011;18:272–279.
  • Cao D, Humphrey PA, Gao F, et al. Ability of linear length of positive margin in radical prostatectomy specimens to predict biochemical recurrence. Urology. 2011;77:1409–1414.
  • Lake AM, He C, Wood DP Jr. Focal positive surgical margins decrease disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy even in organ-confined disease. Urology. 2010;76:1212–1216.
  • Brimo F, Partin AW, Epstein JI. Tumor grade at margins of resection in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent predictor of prognosis. Urology. 2010;76:1206–1209.
  • Chuang AY, Nielsen ME, Hernandez DJ, et al. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2007;178:1306–1310.
  • Pettus JA, Weight CJ, Thompson CJ, et al. Biochemical failure in men following radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact of surgical margin status and location. J Urol. 2004;172:129–132.
  • Tozawa K, Yasui T, Umemoto Y, et al. Pitfalls of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comparison of positive surgical margins between robotic and laparoscopic surgery. Int J Urol. 2014;21:976–979.
  • Fesseha T, Sakr W, Grignon D, et al. Prognostic implications of a positive apical margin in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol. 1997;158:2176–2179.
  • Ohori M, Abbas F, Wheeler TM, et al. Pathological features and prognostic significance of prostate cancer in the apical section determined by whole mount histology. J Urol. 1999;161:500–504.
  • Poulos CK, Koch MO, Eble JN, et al. Bladder neck invasion is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence. Cancer. 2004;101:1563–1568.
  • Aydin H, Tsuzuki T, Hernandez D, et al. Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression. Urology. 2004;64:551–555.
  • Sofer M, Hamilton-Nelson KL, Civantos F, et al. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression. J Urol. 2002;167:2453–2456.
  • Yossepowitch O, Sircar K, Scardino PT, et al. Bladder neck involvement in pathological stage pT4 radical prostatectomy specimens is not an independent prognostic factor. J Urol. 2002;168:2011–2015.
  • Obek C, Sadek S, Lai S, et al. Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy: anatomic site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis. Urology. 1999;54:682–688.
  • Dash A, Sanda MG, Yu M, et al. Prostate cancer involving the bladder neck: recurrence-free survival and implications for AJCC staging modification. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Urology. 2002;60:276–280.
  • Bastide C, Savage C, Cronin A, et al. Location and number of positive surgical margins as prognostic factors of biochemical recurrence after salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2010;106:1454–1457.
  • Vickers A, Bianco F, Cronin A, et al. The learning curve for surgical margins after open radical prostatectomy: implications for margin status as an oncological end point. J Urol. 2010;183:1360–1365.
  • Secin FP, Savage C, Abbou C, et al. The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multicenter study. J Urol. 2010;184:2291–2296.
  • Sooriakumaran P, John M, Wiklund P, et al. Learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of 3794 patients. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2011;63:191–198.
  • Tefilli MV, Gheiler EL, Tiguert R, et al. Prognostic indicators in patients with seminal vesicle involvement following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 1998;160:802–806.
  • Swanson GP, Riggs M, Hermans M. Pathologic findings at radical prostatectomy: risk factors for failure and death. Urol Oncol. 2007;25:110–114.
  • Hong YM, Sutherland DE, Linder B, et al. “Learning curve” may not be enough: assessing the oncological experience curve for robotic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2010;24:473–477.
  • Budaus L, Isbarn H, Eichelberg C, et al. Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multiplicative interaction between surgical margin status and pathological stage. J Urol. 2010;184:1341–1346.
  • Wiegel T, Bartkowiak D, Bottke D, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy versus wait-and-see after radical prostatectomy: 10-year follow-up of the ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95 trial. Eur Urol. 2014;66:243–250.
  • Swanson GP, Yu C, Kattan MW, et al. Validation of postoperative nomograms in prostate cancer patients with long-term follow-up. Urology. 2011;78:105–109.
  • Brajtbord JS, Leapman MS, Cooperberg MR. The CAPRA score at 10 years: contemporary perspectives and analysis of supporting studies. Eur Urol. 2016;71:705-709.
  • Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, et al. Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7005–7012.
  • Suardi N, Porter CR, Reuther AM, et al. A nomogram predicting long-term biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Cancer. 2008;112:1254–1263.
  • Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2009;181:956–962.
  • Swanson GP, Hussey MA, Tangen CM, et al. Predominant treatment failure in postprostatectomy patients is local: analysis of patterns of treatment failure in SWOG 8794. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2225–2229.
  • Bolla M, Van Poppel H, Tombal B, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet. 2012;380:2018–2027.
  • Daly T, Hickey BE, Lehman M, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12.
  • Kalbasi A, Swisher-McClure S, Mitra N, et al. Low rates of adjuvant radiation in patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer with high-risk pathologic features. Cancer. 2014;120:3089–3096.
  • Chen C, Lin T, Zhou Y, et al. Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e104918.
  • Fossati N, Karnes RJ, Boorjian SA, et al. Long-term impact of adjuvant versus early salvage radiation therapy in pT3N0 prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: results from a multi-institutional series. Eur Urol. 2016;15:e544.
  • Briganti A, Wiegel T, Joniau S, et al. Early salvage radiation therapy does not compromise cancer control in patients with pT3N0 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: results of a match-controlled multi-institutional analysis. Eur Urol. 2012;62:472–487.
  • Ost P, De Troyer B, Fonteyne V, et al. A matched control analysis of adjuvant and salvage high-dose postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80:1316–1322.
  • Abugharib A, Jackson WC, Tumati V, et al. Very early salvage radiotherapy improves distant metastasis-free survival. J Urol. 2016;197:662-668.
  • Fossati N, Karnes RJ, Cozzarini C, et al. Assessing the optimal timing for early salvage radiation therapy in patients with prostate-specific antigen rise after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2016;69:728–733.
  • Seisen T, Trinh QD, Abdollah F. Could lead-time bias explain the apparent benefits of early salvage radiotherapy? Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14:193–194.
  • Trock BJ, Han M, Freedland SJ, et al. Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2008;299:2760–2769.
  • Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Bianco FJ Jr., et al. Salvage therapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2004;5:357–365.
  • Mauermann J, Fradet V, Lacombe L, et al. The impact of solitary and multiple positive surgical margins on hard clinical end points in 1712 adjuvant treatment-naive pT2-4 N0 radical prostatectomy patients. Eur Urol. 2013;64:19–25.
  • Abdollah F, Suardi N, Cozzarini C, et al. Selecting the optimal candidate for adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a long-term survival analysis. Eur Urol. 2013;63:998–1008.
  • Gandaglia G, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, et al. Early radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy improves cancer-specific survival only in patients with highly aggressive prostate cancer: validation of recently released criteria. Int J Urol. 2015;22:89–95.
  • Jia ZW, Chang K, Dai B, et al. Factors influencing biochemical recurrence in patients who have received salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2017;19:493-499.
  • Parker C, Sydes MR, Catton C, et al. Radiotherapy and androgen deprivation in combination after local surgery (RADICALS): a new Medical Research Council/National Cancer Institute of Canada phase III trial of adjuvant treatment after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2007;99:1376–1379.
  • Pearse M, Fraser-Browne C, Davis ID, et al. A phase III trial to investigate the timing of radiotherapy for prostate cancer with high-risk features: background and rationale of the Radiotherapy – Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage (RAVES) trial. BJU Int. 2014;113(Suppl 2):7–12.
  • Shipley WU, Seiferheld W, Lukka HR, et al. Radiation with or without antiandrogen therapy in recurrent prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:417–428.
  • Carrie C, Hasbini A, De Laroche G, et al. Salvage radiotherapy with or without short-term hormone therapy for rising prostate-specific antigen concentration after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 16): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:747–756.
  • Zhao SG, Chang SL, Spratt DE, et al. Development and validation of a 24-gene predictor of response to postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a matched, retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1612–1620.
  • Den RB, Yousefi K, Trabulsi EJ, et al. Genomic classifier identifies men with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy who benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:944–951.
  • Tilki D, Mandel P, Schlomm T, et al. External validation of the CAPRA-S score to predict biochemical recurrence, metastasis and mortality after radical prostatectomy in a European cohort. J Urol. 2015;193:1970–1975.
  • Cozzarini C, Fiorino C, Da Pozzo LF, et al. Clinical factors predicting late severe urinary toxicity after postoperative radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma: a single-institute analysis of 742 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:191–199.
  • King CR. The dose-response of salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2016;121:199–203.
  • Riou O, Laliberte B, Azria D, et al. Implementing intensity modulated radiotherapy to the prostate bed: dosimetric study and early clinical results. Med Dosim. 2013;38:117–121.
  • Ost P, Fonteyne V, Villeirs G, et al. Adjuvant high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: clinical results in 104 patients. Eur Urol. 2009;56:669–675.
  • D’Angelillo RM, Sciuto R, Ramella S, et al. (1, 8)F-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography-driven high-dose salvage radiation therapy in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in 60 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90:296–302.
  • Ghadjar P, Gwerder N, Manser P, et al. High-dose (80 Gy) intensity-modulated radiation therapy with daily image-guidance as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. 2010;186:687–692.
  • Cozzarini C, Fiorino C, Deantoni C, et al. Higher-than-expected severe (Grade 3-4) late urinary toxicity after postprostatectomy hypofractionated radiotherapy: a single-institution analysis of 1176 patients. Eur Urol. 2014;66:1024–1030.
  • Buchser D, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Melcon JI, et al. Salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for histologically confirmed macroscopic local relapsed prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2016;8:477–483.
  • Strom TJ, Wilder RB, Fernandez DC, et al. High-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without intensity modulated radiation therapy as salvage treatment for an isolated, gross local recurrence of prostate cancer post-prostatectomy. Brachytherapy. 2014;13:123–127.
  • Kumar AM, Smith KL, Reddy CA, et al. Safety and efficacy of salvage low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate bed recurrences following radical prostatectomy. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2015;7:241–246.
  • Hosogoe S, Soma O, Matsumoto T, et al. Salvage brachytherapy for castration-resistant and external beam radiotherapy-resistant local recurrence 17 years after radical prostatectomy. Case Rep Urol. 2015;2015:839738.
  • Gaztanaga M, Crook JM. Permanent seed brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a case report and review of the literature. Brachytherapy. 2013;12:338–342.
  • Gomez-Veiga F, Marino A, Alvarez L, et al. Brachytherapy for the treatment of recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2012;109(Suppl 1):17–21.
  • Traudt K, Ciezki J, Klein EA. Low-dose-rate brachytherapy as salvage treatment of local prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2011;77:1416–1419.
  • Losa A, Nava LD, Di Muzio N, et al. Salvage brachytherapy for local recurrence after radical prostatectomy and subsequent external beam radiotherapy. Urology. 2003;62:1068–1072.
  • Nobes JP, Khaksar SJ, Hawkins MA, et al. Novel prostate brachytherapy technique: improved dosimetric and clinical outcome. Radiother Oncol. 2008;88:121–126.
  • Pinkawa M, Fischedick K, Piroth MD, et al. Health-related quality of life after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer: correlation with postimplant CT scan parameters. Strahlenther Onkol. 2006;182:660–665.
  • Poortmans P, Bossi A, Vandeputte K, et al. Guidelines for target volume definition in post-operative radiotherapy for prostate cancer, on behalf of the EORTC Radiation Oncology Group. Radiother Oncol. 2007;84:121–127.
  • Michalski JM, Lawton C, El Naqa I, et al. Development of RTOG consensus guidelines for the definition of the clinical target volume for postoperative conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:361–368.
  • Sidhom MA, Kneebone AB, Lehman M, et al. Post-prostatectomy radiation therapy: consensus guidelines of the Australian and New Zealand Radiation Oncology Genito-Urinary Group. Radiother Oncol. 2008;88:10–19.
  • Wiltshire KL, Brock KK, Haider MA, et al. Anatomic boundaries of the clinical target volume (prostate bed) after radical prostatectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:1090–1099.
  • Ost P, De Meerleer G, Vercauteren T, et al. Delineation of the postprostatectomy prostate bed using computed tomography: interobserver variability following the EORTC delineation guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:e143–9.
  • Park JS, Park W, Pyo HR, et al. Suggestion for the prostatic fossa clinical target volume in adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy after a radical prostatectomy. Radiother Oncol. 2014;110:240–244.
  • Manji M, Crook J, Schmid M, et al. Target volume definition for post prostatectomy radiotherapy: do the consensus guidelines correctly define the inferior border of the CTV? Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2016;21:525–531.
  • Spiotto MT, Hancock SL, King CR. Radiotherapy after prostatectomy: improved biochemical relapse-free survival with whole pelvic compared with prostate bed only for high-risk patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:54–61.
  • Song C, Kang HC, Kim JS, et al. Elective pelvic versus prostate bed-only salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Strahlenther Onkol. 2015;191:801–809.
  • Deville C, Vapiwala N, Hwang WT, et al. Comparative toxicity and dosimetric profile of whole-pelvis versus prostate bed-only intensity-modulated radiation therapy after prostatectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:1389–1396.
  • Alongi F, Fiorino C, Cozzarini C, et al. IMRT significantly reduces acute toxicity of whole-pelvis irradiation in patients treated with post-operative adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Radiother Oncol. 2009;93:207–212.
  • Verma V, Chen L, Michalski JM, et al. Evaluation of 3 T pelvic MRI imaging in prostate cancer patients receiving post-prostatectomy IMRT. World J Urol. 2015;33:69–75.
  • Muller BG, Kaushal A, Sankineni S, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion-assisted biopsy for the diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2015;33:425.e1-6.
  • Yu T, Meng N, Chi D, et al. Diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in detecting residual or recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: a pooled analysis of 12 individual studies. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015;72:687–694.
  • Dirix P, van Walle L, Deckers F, et al. Proposal for magnetic resonance imaging-guided salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Acta Oncol. 2016;56:27-32.
  • Lawton CA, Michalski J, El-Naqa I, et al. RTOG GU radiation oncology specialists reach consensus on pelvic lymph node volumes for high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74:383–387.
  • Meijer HJ, van Lin EN, Debats OA, et al. High occurrence of aberrant lymph node spread on magnetic resonance lymphography in prostate cancer patients with a biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:1405–1410.
  • Evangelista L, Zattoni F, Guttilla A, et al. Choline PET or PET/CT and biochemical relapse of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:305–314.
  • Fanti S, Minozzi S, Castellucci P, et al. PET/CT with (11)C-choline for evaluation of prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence: meta-analysis and critical review of available data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:55–69.
  • Vees H, Buchegger F, Albrecht S, et al. 18F-choline and/or 11C-acetate positron emission tomography: detection of residual or progressive subclinical disease at very low prostate-specific antigen values (<1 ng/mL) after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2007;99:1415–1420.
  • Schillaci O, Calabria F, Tavolozza M, et al. Influence of PSA, PSA velocity and PSA doubling time on contrast-enhanced 18F-choline PET/CT detection rate in patients with rising PSA after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:589–596.
  • Bluemel C, Linke F, Herrmann K, et al. Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on salvage radiotherapy planning in patients with prostate cancer and persisting PSA values or biochemical relapse after prostatectomy. EJNMMI Res. 2016;6:78.
  • Freitag MT, Radtke JP, Afshar-Oromieh A, et al. Local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy is at risk to be missed in 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET of PET/CT and PET/MRI: comparison with mpMRI integrated in simultaneous PET/MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:776-787.
  • Eiber M, Maurer T, Souvatzoglou M, et al. Evaluation of hybrid (6, 8)Ga-PSMA Ligand PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:668–674.
  • Schwenck J, Rempp H, Reischl G, et al. Comparison of 68Ga-labelled PSMA-11 and 11C-choline in the detection of prostate cancer metastases by PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:92–101.
  • Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR. Trends in management for patients with localized prostate cancer, 1990-2013. JAMA. 2015;314:80–82.
  • Ost P, Jereczek-Fossa BA, van As N, et al. Pattern of progression after stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer nodal recurrences. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2016;28:e115–e120.
  • Park SY, Kim CK, Park BK, et al. Early changes in apparent diffusion coefficient from diffusion-weighted MR imaging during radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:749–755.