A game of futures: the strategy of scenarios in a Danish medical company

References

• Aligica, P. D. 2004. “The Challenge of the Future and the Institutionalization of Interdisciplinarity: Notes on Herman Kahn’s Legacy.” Futures 36 (1): 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00136-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2010. “Preemption, Precaution, Preparedness: Anticipatory Action and Future Geographies.” Progress in Human Geography 34 (6): 777–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, J. 2018. The Future of the World. Futurology, Futurists, and the Struggle for the Post-Cold War Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. 2013. The Future as Cultural Fact. Essays on the Global Condition. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ardener, E. 1989. “The Voice of Prophecy: Further Problems in the Analysis of Events.” In Edwin Ardener. The Voice of Prophecy and Other Essays, edited by M. Chapman, 134–154. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Balarezo, J., and B. B. Nielsen. 2017. “Scenario Planning as Organizational Intervention: An Integrative Framework and Future Research Directions.” Review of International Business and Strategy 27 (1): 2–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-09-2016-0049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. 2016. Imagined Futures. Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. 2021. “The Firm as an Engine of Imagination: Organizational Prospection and the Making of Economic Futures.” Organization Theory 2 (2): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211005773.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J., and R. Bronk. 2018a. “An Introduction to Uncertain Futures.” In Uncertain Futures. Imaginaries, Narratives, and Calculation in the Economy, edited by J. Beckert, and R. Bronk, 1–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J., and R. Bronk, eds. 2018b. Uncertain Futures. Imaginaries, Narratives, and Calculation in the Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behrent, M. C. 2013. “Foucault and Technology.” History and Technology 29 (1): 54–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2013.780351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, A. 2023. “Governing Like a Resilient City: Preparing a City for Climate Change through Laboratories and Adjacent Spaces of Governance.” PhD diss., Faculty of Arts, Aarhus University.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, S., and A. Langley. 2016. “The Interplay of Reflective and Experimental Spaces in Interrupting and Reorienting Routine Dynamics.” Organization Science 27 (3): 594–613. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, S. J. 2008. “Enacting Catastrophe: Preparedness, Insurance, Budgetary Rationalization.” Economy and Society 37 (2): 224–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140801933280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, S. J., S. Cox, and K. Grove. 2016. “Rebuilding by Design in Post-Sandy New York.” Limn. http://limn.it/rebuilding-by-design-in-post-sandy-new-york/.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, S. J., and A. Lakoff. 2015. “Vital Systems Security: Reflexive Biopolitics and the Government of Emergency.” Theory, Culture & Society 32 (2): 19–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413510050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comi, A., and J. Whyte. 2018. “Future Making and Visual Artefacts: An Ethnographic Study of a Design Project.” Organization Studies 39 (8): 1055–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617717094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. 2010. “Turbulent Worlds: Financial Markets and Environmental Crisis.” Theory, Culture & Society 27 (2–3): 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409358727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farias, C. 2017. “That’s What Friends Are For: Hospitality and Affective Bonds Fostering Collective Empowerment in an Intentional Community.” Organization Studies 38 (5): 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616670437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, D. K. 2009. “‘My Customers are Different!’ Identity, Difference, and the Political Economy of Design.” In Ethnography and the Corporate Encounter. Reflections on Research in and of Corporations, edited by M. Cefkin, 41–57. New York and Oxford: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Flyverbom, M., and C. Garsten. 2021. “Anticipation and Organization: Seeing, Knowing and Governing Futures.” Organization Theory 2 (3): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211020325.
   Google Scholar
• Flyverbom, M., and A. K. Madsen. 2015. “Sorting Data Out: Unpacking Big Data Value Chains and Algorithmic Knowledge Production.” In Die Gesellschaft der Daten, edited by F. Süssenguth, 123–144. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 87–104. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2007. Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the College de France, 1977–78. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, T. 2009. Design Futuring. Sustainability, Ethics, and New Practices. New York: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Gatt, C., and T. Ingold. 2013. “From Description to Correspondence: Anthropology in Real Time.” In Design Anthropology. Theory and Practice, edited by W. Gunn, T. Otto, and R. C. Smith, 139–158. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Gell, A. 1992. “The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology.” In Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics, edited by J. Coote, and A. Shelton, 40–63. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gümüsay, A. A., and J. Reinecke. 2022. “Researching for Desirable Futures: From Real Utopias to Imagining Alternatives.” Journal of Management Studies 59 (1): 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. 2005. “Uncovering the Semiotic in Organizational Aesthetics.” Organization 12 (1): 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405048575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastrup, K. 2001. “Othello’s Dance: Cultural Creativity and Human Agency.” In Locating Cultural Creativity, edited by J. Liep, 31–45. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hastrup, K., and M. Skrydstrup, eds. 2013. The Social Life of Climate Change Models. Anticipating Nature. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D. 2013. “Absolutely Fabulous! Fabulation and Organisation-Creation in Processes of Becoming Entrepreneur.” Society and Business Review 8 (3): 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-02-2013-0020.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, D. R., and G. E. Marcus. 2008. “Collaboration Today and the Re-Imagination of the Classic Scene of Fieldwork Encounter.” Collaborative Anthropologies 1: 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1353/cla.0.0003.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. 2011. “Prototyping the Social: Temporality and Speculative Futures at the Intersection of Design and Culture.” In Design Anthropology. Object Culture in the 21st Century, edited by A. J. Clarke, 33–44. Wien, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P., and S. Kaplan. 2015. “Strategy Tools-in-use: A Framework for Understanding “Technologies of Rationality” in Practice.” Strategic Management Journal 36 (4): 537–558. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. 2012. “Disenchantment, Enchantment and Re-Enchantment: Max Weber at the Millennium.” Mind and Matter 10 (2): 149–168.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, A. C. 2014. “Introduction. The Prototype: More Than Many and Less Than One.” Journal of Cultural Economy 7 (4): 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2013.858059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, C. B., and C. De Cock. 2018. “Ideologies of Time: How Elite Corporate Actors Engage the Future.” Organization 25 (2): 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417725592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöhncke, S., and V. Steffen. 2015. “Introduction: Ethnographies on the Limits of Reason.” In Between Magic and Rationality. On the Limits of Reason in the Modern World, edited by V. Steffen, S. Jöhncke, and K. M. Raahauge, 9–39. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juech, C., and E. S. Michelson. 2012. “Innovation in Horizon Scanning for the Social Sector: An Introduction to the Searchlight Function.” Foresight 14 (6): 439–449. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636681211284908.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, H., and A. J. Wiener. 1967. The Year 2000. A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kokkinidis, G. 2015. “Spaces of Possibilities: Workers’ Self-Management in Greece.” Organization 22 (6): 847–871. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414521098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause-Jensen, J. 2010. Flexible Firm. The Design of Culture at Bang & Olufsen. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, A. 2007. “Preparing for the Next Emergency.” Public Culture 19 (2): 247–271. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2006-035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, A. 2008. “The Generic Biothreat, or, How We Became Unprepared.” Cultural Anthropology 23 (3): 399–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2008.00013.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lê, J. K. 2013. “How Constructions of the Future Shape Organizational Responses: Climate Change and the Canadian Oil Sands.” Organization 20 (5): 722–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413489817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1976. “The Future Cannot Begin: Temporal Structures in Modern Society.” Social Research 43 (1): 130–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeckelbergh, M. 2011. “Doing is Believing: Prefiguration as Strategic Practice in the Alterglobalization Movement.” Social Movement Studies 10 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2011.545223.
   Google Scholar
• Mauksch, S. 2017. “Managing the Dance of Enchantment: An Ethnography of Social Entrepreneurship Events.” Organization 24 (2): 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508416644511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. 2011. “Futures Within: Reversible Time and House-Building in Maputo, Mozambique.” Anthropological Theory 11 (4): 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499611423871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H. 2016. The Cunning of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyberg, D., and C. Wright. 2016. “Performative and Political: Corporate Constructions of Climate Change Risk.” Organization 23 (5): 617–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508415572038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar, J. F., S. Pink, A. Irwing, and J. Sjöberg, eds. 2017. Anthropologies and Futures. Researching Emerging and Uncertain Worlds. London, New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Samimian-Darash, L. 2009. “A Pre-Event Configuration for Biological Threats: Preparedness and the Constitution of Biosecurity Events.” American Ethnologist 36 (3): 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2009.01174.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samimian-Darash, L. 2016. “Practicing Uncertainty: Scenario-Based Preparedness Exercises in Israel.” Cultural Anthropology 31 (3): 359–386. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.3.06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samimian-Darash, L., and P. Rabinow. 2015. “Introduction.” In Modes of Uncertainty, edited by L. Samimian-Darash, and P. Rabinow, 1–9. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J., and R. Thedvall, eds. 2017. Meeting Ethnography. Meetings as Key Technologies of Contemporary Governance, Development, and Resistance. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schoemaker, P. J. H. 1995. “Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking.” Sloan Management Review 36 (2): 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartzman, H. B. 1989. The Meeting. Gatherings in Organizations and Communities. New York and London: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skibsted, J. M., and C. Bason. 2022. Expand. Stretching the Future by Design. Dallas, TX: Matt Holt Books.
   Google Scholar
• Skoglund, A., and S. Böhm. 2020. “Prefigurative Partaking: Employees’ Environmental Activism in an Energy Utility.” Organization Studies 41 (9): 1257–1283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619847716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. C., K. T. Vangkilde, M. G. Kjærsgaard, T. Otto, J. Halse, and T. Binder, eds. 2016. Design Anthropological Futures. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Sneath, D., M. Holbraad, and M. A. Pedersen. 2009. “Technologies of the Imagination: An Introduction.” Ethnos 74 (1): 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840902751147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. 1992. Reproducing the Future. Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 2011. “Anthropological Relocations and the Limits of Design.” Annual Review of Anthropology 40: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.041608.105640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, N. A., and O. Byrne. 2022. “Imagining Futures: Theorizing the Practical Knowledge of Future-Making.” Organization Studies 43 (2): 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406211053222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkle, S., ed. 2007. Evocative Objects. Things We Think With. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vangkilde, K. T. 2015. “Possessed by the Zeitgeist: Inspiration and Prophecy in the Business of Fashion.” Journal of Business Anthropology 4 (2): 178–200. https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v4i2.4890.
   Google Scholar
• Vangkilde, K. T. 2017. “Foretelling the Future: The Fashion Designer as Shaman.” Anthropology Today 33 (2): 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12336.
   Google Scholar
• Vangkilde, K. T., and M. H. Rod. 2016. “Para-Ethnography 2.0: An Experiment in Design Anthropological Collaboration.” In Design Anthropological Futures, edited by R. C. Smith, K. T. Vangkilde, M. G. Kjærsgaard, T. Otto, J. Halse, and T. Binder, 155–168. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Vangkilde, K. T., and D. B. Sausdal. 2016. “Overponderabilia: Overcoming Overthinking When Studying ‘Ourselves’.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 17 (2): Art. 28.
   Google Scholar
• Varum, C. A., and C. Melo. 2010. “Directions in Scenario Planning Literature – A Review of the Past Decades.” Futures 42 (4): 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vohnsen, N. H. 2015. “Street-Level Planning: The Shifty Nature of Local Knowledge and Practice.” Journal of Organizational Ethnography 4 (2): 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-09-2014-0032.
   Google Scholar
• Wack, P. 1985a. “Scenarios: Uncharted Waters Ahead. How Royal Dutch/Shell Developed a Planning Technique That Teaches Managers to Think About an Uncertain Future.” Harvard Business Review 63 (September–October): 73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Wack, P. 1985b. “Scenarios: Shooting the Rapids. How Medium-Term Analysis Illuminated the Power of Scenarios for Shell Management.” Harvard Business Review 63 (November–December): 139–150.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1930. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M., H. Krämer, J. Koch, and A. Reckwitz. 2020. “Future and Organization Studies: On the Rediscovery of a Problematic Temporal Category in Organizations.” Organization Studies 41 (10): 1441–1455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620912977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. 1998. “A New Theory of Innovation?” Prometheus 16 (4): 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109029808629293.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L. 2015. “Rethinking Prefiguration: Alternatives, Micropolitics and Goals in Social Movements.” Social Movement Studies 14 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2013.870883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ybema, S., and F. Kamsteeg. 2009. “Making the Familiar Strange: A Case for Disengaged Organizational Ethnography.” In Organizational Ethnography. Studying the Complexities of Everyday Life, edited by S. Ybema, D. Yanow, H. Wels, and F. Kamsteeg, 101–119. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar