Four-dimensional fetal echocardiography with spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC): A systematic study of standard cardiac views assessed by different observers

References

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in infant mortality attributable to birth defects - United States, 1980-1995. MMWR 1998;47:773–738.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boneva RS, Botto LD, Moore CA, et al. Mortality associated with congenital heart defects in the United States: Trends and racial disparities, 1979-1997. Circulation 2001;103:2376–2381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnet D, Coltri A, Butera G, et al. Detection of transposi-tion of the great arteries in fetuses reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality. Circulation 1999;99:916–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tworetzky W, McElhinney DB, Reddy VM, et al. Improved surgical outcome after fetal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation 2001;103:1269–1273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahle WT, Clancy RR, McGaurn SP, et al. Impact of prenatal diagnosis on survival and early neurologic morbidity in neonates with the hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatrics 2001;107:1277–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin 0, Burch M, Manning N, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta improves survival and reduces morbidity. Heart 2002;87:67–69.
   Google Scholar
• Crane JP, LeFevre ML, Winborn RC, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: Impact on the detection, management, and outcome of anomalous fetuses. The RADIUS Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:392–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tometzki AJ, Suda K, Kohl T, et al. Accuracy of prenatal echocardiographic diagnosis and prognosis of fetuses with conotruncal anomalies. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1696–1701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll C, Alembik Y, Don B, et al. Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn 1998;18:801–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeggi ET, Sholler GF, Jones OD, et al. Comparative analysis of pattern, management and outcome of pre- versus postna-tally diagnosed major congenital heart disease: A population-based study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:380–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montana E, Khoury MJ, Cragan JD, et al. Trends and outcomes after prenatal diagnosis of congenital cardiac malformations by fetal echocardiography in a well defined birth population, Atlanta, Georgia, 1990-1994. J Am Coll Cardiol 199628:1805-1809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Game E, Stoll C, Clementi M. Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases by ultrasound: experi-ence from 20 European registries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17: 386–391.
   Google Scholar
• Bull C. Current and potential impact of fetal diagnosis on prevalence and spectrum of serious congenital heart disease at term in the UK. British Paediatric Cardiac Association. Lancet 1999;354:1242–1247.
   Google Scholar
• Levi S. Mass screening for fetal malformations: the Eurofetus study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:555–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan LD, Chita SK, Sharland GK, et al. The accuracy of fetal echocardiography in the diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol 1989;25:279–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigton TR, Sabbagha RE, Tamura RK, et al. Sonographic diagnosis of congenital heart disease: Comparison between the four-chamber view and multiple cardiac views. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:219–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benacerraf BR, Pober BR, Sanders SP. Accuracy of fetal echocardiography. Radiology 1987;165:847–849.
   Google Scholar
• Copel JA, Pilu G, Green J, et al. Fetal echocardiographic screening for congenital heart disease: the importance of the four-chamber view. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157:648–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford DC, Chita SK, Allan LD. Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease: Factors affecting obstetric manage-ment and survival. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:352–356.
   Google Scholar
• Callan NA, Maggio M, Steger S, et al. Fetal echocardio-graphy: Indications for referral, prenatal diagnoses, and outcomes. Am J Perinatol 1991;8:390–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan LD, Sharland GK, Milburn A, et al. Prospective diagnosis of 1,006 consecutive cases of congenital heart disease in the fetus. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:1452–1458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromley B, Estroff JA, Sanders SP, et al. Fetal echocardio-graphy: Accuracy and limitations in a population at high and low risk for heart defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1473–1481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tegnander E, Eik-Nes SH, Johansen 0J, et al. Prenatal detection of heart defects at the routine fetal examination at 18 weeks in a non-selected population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5: 372–380.
   Google Scholar
• Rustic() MA, Benettoni A, D'Ottavio G, et al. Fetal heart screening in low-risk pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;6: 313–319.
   Google Scholar
• Ott WJ. The accuracy of antenatal fetal echocardiography screening in high- and low-risk patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1741–1747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giancotti A, Torcia F, Giampa G, et al. Prenatal evaluation of congenital heart disease in high-risk pregnancies. Chin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1995;22:225–229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stumpflen I, Stumpflen A, Wimmer M, et al. Effect of detailed fetal echocardiography as part of routine prenatal ultrasonographic screening on detection of congenital heart disease. Lancet 1996;348:854–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todros T, Faggiano F, Chiappa E, et al. Accuracy of routine ultrasonography in screening heart disease prenatally. Gruppo Piemontese for Prenatal Screening of Congenital Heart Disease. Prenat Diagn 1997;17:901–906.
   Google Scholar
• Klein SK, Cans C, Robert E, et al. Efficacy of routine fetal ultrasound screening for congenital heart disease in Isere County, France. Prenat Diagn 1999;19:318–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner E, Scholler J, Schuchter K, et al. Detection of fetal congenital heart disease in a low-risk population. Prenat Diagn 1998;18:808–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen EH, Rein AJ. Antenatal diagnosis of cardiac mal-formation: A structural study. Fetal Diagn Ther 2000;15:54–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Wittkopf M, Cooper S, Sholler G. Correlation between fetal cardiac diagnosis by obstetric and pediatric cardiologist sonographers and comparison with postnatal findings. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:392–397.
   Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Pagotto L, Kaufman M, et al. Accuracy of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001;16:407–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driggers RW, Spevak PJ, Crino JP, et al. Fetal anatomic and functional echocardiography: A 5-year review. J Ultrasound Med 2003;22:45–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong SF, Chan FY, Cincotta RB, et al. Factors influencing the prenatal detection of structural congenital heart diseases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:19–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk JS, Comstock CH, Lee W, et al. Sonographic screening to detect fetal cardiac anomalies: a 5-year experience with 111 abnormal cases. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:227–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVore GR. The aortic and pulmonary outflow tract screen-ing examination in the human fetus. J Ultrasound Med 1992;11:345–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaoui R. The four-chamber view: four reasons why it seems to fail in screening for cardiac abnormalities and suggestions to improve detection rate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell S, Allan L, Benacerraf B, et al. Isolated major congenital heart disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:370–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benacerraf BR Sonographic detection of fetal anomalies of the aortic and pulmonary arteries: Value of four-chamber view vs direct images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:1483–1489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Game E. Prenatal diagnosis of six major cardiac malforma-tions in Europe - a population based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80:224–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan L. Transposition of the great arteries. In: Allan L, Hornberger L, Sharland GK, editors. Textbook of fetal cardiology. London: Greenwich Medical Media Limited; 2000. pp 261–273.
   Google Scholar
• Yagel S, Arbel R, Anteby EY, et al. The three vessels and trachea view (3VT) in fetal cardiac scanning. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20:340–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo SJ, Lee YH, Kim ES, et al. Three-vessel view of the fetal upper mediastinum: An easy means of detecting abnormalities of the ventricular outflow tracts and great arteries during obstetric screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:173–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levental M, Pretorius DH, Sklansky MS, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasonography of normal fetal heart: Compar-ison with two-dimensional imaging. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:341–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson TR, Pretorius DH, Sklansky M, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of fetal heart anatomy and function: Acquisition, analysis, and display. J Ultrasound Med 1996;15:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Wittkopf M, Cooper S, Vaughan J, et al. Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic analysis of congenital heart disease in the fetus: Comparison with cross-sectional (2D) fetal echocardiography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17: 485–492.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra FA, Isla AT, Aguilar RC, et al. Use of free-hand three-dimensional ultrasound software in the study of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:329–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bega G, Kuhlman K, Lev-Toaff A, et al. Application of three-dimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of the fetal heart. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:307–313.
   Google Scholar
• Chang FM, Hsu KF, Ko HC, et al. Fetal heart volume assessment by three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:42–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zosmer N, Jurkovic D, Jauniaux E, et al. Selection and identification of standard cardiac views from three-dimen-sional volume scans of the fetal thorax. J Ultrasound Med 1996;15:25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharf A, Geka F, Steinborn A, et al. 3D real-time imaging of the fetal heart. Fetal Diagn Ther 2000;15:267–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng J, Gardener JE, Rodeck CH, et al. Fetal echocardio-graphy in three and four dimensions. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996;22:979–986.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeVore GR, Falkensammer P, Sklansky MS, et al. Spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC): new technology for evaluation of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:380–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinals F, Poblete P, Giuliano A. Spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC): A new tool for the prenatal screening of congenital heart defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:388–394.
   Google Scholar
• Sklansky MS, Nelson T, Strachan M, et al. Real-time three-dimensional fetal echocardiography: initial feasibility study. J Ultrasound Med 1999;18:745–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng J, Sullivan ID, Yates R, et al. Real-time three-dimensional fetal echocardiography - optimal imaging win-dows. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002;28:1099–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goncalves LF, Lee W, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. Four-dimensional ultrasonography of the fetal heart with spatio-temporal image correlation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1792–1802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GC. The measurement of observer agree-ment for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharland GK. Common arterial trunk. In: Allan L, Hornber-ger L, Sharland GK, editors. Textbook of fetal cardiology. London: Greenwich Medical Media Limited; 2000. pp 288–303.
   Google Scholar
• Hornberger LK. Tetralogy of Fallot. In: Allan L, Hornberger L, Sharland GK, editors. Textbook of fetal cardiology. London: Greenwich Medical Media Limited; 2000. pp 248–260.
   Google Scholar
• Rice MJ, McDonald RW, Pilu G et al. Cardiac malforma-tions. In: Nyberg DA, McGahan JP, Pretorius DH, et al., editors. Diagnostic imaging of fetal anomalies. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003. pp 451–506.
   Google Scholar
• Grandjean H, Larroque D, Levi S. The performance of routine ultrasonographic screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:446–454.
   Google Scholar
• Levi S, Zhang WH, Alexander S, et al. Short-term outcome of isolated and associated congenital heart defects in relation to antenatal ultrasound screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:532–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achiron R, Glaser J, Gelernter I, et al. Extended fetal echocardiographic examination for detecting cardiac malfor-mations in low risk pregnancies. BMJ 1992;304:671–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll C, Alembik Y, Doti B, et al. Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn 1993;13:453–461.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carvalho JS, Mavrides E, Shinebourne EA, et al. Improving the effectiveness of routine prenatal screening for major congenital heart defects. Heart 2002;88:387–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee W. Performance of the basic fetal cardiac ultrasound examination. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:601–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVore GR, Medearis AL, Bear MB, et al. Fetal echocardio-graphy: Factors that influence imaging of the fetal heart during the second trimester of pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 1993;12:659–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar