Matching risk and resources in high-risk pregnancies

References

• St John E B, Nelson K G, Oliver S P, Bishno R R, Goldenberg R L. Cost of neonatal care according to gestational age at birth and survival status. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 170–175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick M C, Siegel J E. Prenatal care: Effectiveness and implementation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeUK 1999
   Google Scholar
• Wise P H, Brett M. Linking prenatal care with women's health care. Prenatal care: Effectiveness and implementation, M C McCormick, J E Siegel. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeUK 2002; 310–314
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg R L, Rouse D J. Prevention of premature birth. The New England Journal of Medicine 1998; 339: 313–320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan M D, Alexander G R, Kotelchuck M, Nagey D A. Relation of the content of prenatal care to the risk of low birth weight: Maternal reports of health behavior advice and initial prenatal care procedures. JAMA 1994; 271: 1340–1345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson P J, Billy J OG. The impact of prenatal care on birth weight: Evidence from an international data set. Med Care 1984; 22: 177–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan M D, Martin J A, Ventura S J, Alexander G R, Kotelchuck M, Frigoletto F D. Benefits and limitations of prenatal care. JAMA 1998; 280: 2071–2073
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorsky R D, Colby R D, Jr. The cost effectiveness of prenatal care in reducing low birth weight in New Hampshire. Health Serv Res 1989; 24: 583–598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington J, Connell F A. Every dollar spent—the cost savings argument for prenatal care. New Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1303–1307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall M H, Chng P K, MacGillivray I. Is routine antenatal care worthwhile?. Lancet 1980; 2: 78–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobel C J, Ross M G, Bemis R J, Bragonier J R, Nessim S, Sandhu M, Bear M B, Mori B. The West Los Angeles preterm birth prevention project, I: Program impact for high-risk women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 54–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korenbrot C C. Risk reduction in pregnancies of low-income women: Comprehensive prenatal care through the OB access project. Mobius 1984; 4: 34–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luke B, Brown M B, Misiunas R, Anderson E, Nugent C, Van de Ven C, Burpee B, Gogliotti S. Specialized prenatal care and maternal and infant outcomes in twin pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 934–938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobino D M, Chase G A, Kim Y J, Crawley B E, Salim J H, Baruffi G. The impact of the Mississippi Improved Child Health Project on prenatal care and low birthweight. Am J Public Health 1986; 76: 274–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker L C, Phibbs C S. Managed care, technology adoption, and health care: The adoption of neonatal intensive care. NBER Industrial Organization and Health Care Meeting, Stanford, CAUSA, April, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Bodenheimer T, Lo B, Casalino L. Primary care physicians should be coordinators, not gatekeepers. JAMA 1999; 281: 2045–2049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris T G, Chang Y, Blumenthal D, Pearson S D. Leaving gatekeeping behind—effects of opening access to specialists for adults in a health maintenance organization. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1312–1317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris T G, Chang Y, Perrin J M, Blumenthal D, Pearson S D. Effects of removing gatekeeping on specialist utilization by children in a health maintenance organization. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002; 156: 574–579
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pati S, Shea S, Rabinowitz D, Carrasquillo O. Does gatekeeping control costs for privately insured children? Findings from the 1996 medical expenditure panel survey. Pediatrics 2003; 111: 456–460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jean Y A. Inclusive intake screening: Shaping medical problems into specialist-appropriate cases. Sociol Health Illn 2004; 26: 385–410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden R D, Penka A, Britt D W, Landsberger E J, Evans M I. Re-evaluating the role of the MFM specialist: Lead, follow, or get out of the way. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 18: 253–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz G S, Papiernik E. Epidemiology of preterm birth. Epidemiol Rev 1993; 15: 414–443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchmayer S M, Sparén P, Cnattingius S. Previous pregnancy loss: Risks associated to severity of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1225–1231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creasy R K, Gummer B A, Liggins G C. System for predicting spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 55: 692–695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main D M, Gabbe S G. Risk scoring for preterm labor: Where do we go from here?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 789–793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller-Heubach E, Guzik D S. Evaluation of risk scoring in a preterm birth prevention study of indigent patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 16: 829–835
   Google Scholar
• Owen J, Goldenberg R L, Davis R O, Kirk K A, Copper R L. Evaluation of a risk scoring system as a predictor of preterm birth in an indigent population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 873–879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch B K. Socioeconomic gradients and low birth weight: Empirical and policy considerations. Health Serv Res 2003; 38: 1819–1841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sin D D, Svenson L W, Cowie R L, Man S FP. Can universal access to health care eliminate health inequities between children of poor and non-poor families?. Chest 2003; 124: 51–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clancy C M, Franks P. Utilization of specialty and primary care: The impact of HMO insurance and patient-related factors. J Fam Pract 1997; 45: 500–508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau K, Nyman R M, Ferris T G, Beal A C, Perrin J M. Correlates of the use of specialty care. Pediatrics 2004; 113: e249–255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenkman E, Tian L, Nackashi J, Schatz D. Managed care organization characteristics and outpatient specialty care among children with chronic illness. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 1547–1554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veugelers P J, Yip A M. Socioeconomic disparities in health care use: Does universal coverage reduce inequalities in health?. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003; 57: 424–428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasker J N, Coyle B, Li K, Ortynsky M. Assessment of risk factors for low birth weight deliveries. Health Care Women Int 2005; 26: 262–280
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heins H C, Jr, Nance N W, McCarthy B J, Efird C M. A randomized trial of nurse-midwifery prenatal care to reduce low birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 341–345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg R L, Davis R O, Copper R L, Corliss D K, Andrews J B, Carpenter A H. The Alabama Preterm Birth Prevention Project. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 931–939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips J. Managed care's reconstruction of human existence: The triumph of technical reason. Theor Med Bioeth 2002; 23: 339–358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gueorguieva R V, Sarkar N P, Carter R L, Ariet M, Roth J, Resnick M B. A risk assessment screening test for very low birth weight. Matern Child Health J 2003; 7: 127–136
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forrest C B, Nutting P, Werner J J, Starfield B, von Schrader S, Rohde C. Managed health plan effects on the specialty referral process: Results from the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network referral study. Med Care 2003; 41: 242–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjaer N K, Karlsen K. Telemedicine and general practice: A way to strengthen the gatekeeper role?. Ugeskr Laeger 2002; 164: 5262–5266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar