When should repeat cesarean delivery be scheduled, after two or more previous cesarean deliveries?

References

• Spong CY, Mercer BM, D’Alton M, et al. Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:323–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melamed N, Hadar E, Keidar L, et al. Timing of planned repeat cesarean delivery after two or more previous cesarean sections: risk for unplanned cesarean delivery and pregnancy outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:431–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed AB, Bayo AI, Abu-Jubara MF. Timing of elective repeated cesarean delivery in patients with previous two or more cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26:10–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tita AT, Landon MB, Spong CY, et al. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med 2009;360:111–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmink FA, Hukkelhoven CW, Lunshof S, et al. Neonatal outcome following elective cesarean section beyond 37 weeks of gestation:a 7-year retrospective analysis of a national registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:250e1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tita AT, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU). Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and maternal perioperative outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:280–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Paranjothy S. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. In: The national sentinel caesarean section audit report. London: RCOG Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar GJ, Clark RH, Greene JD. Short-term outcomes of infants born at 35 and 36 weeks gestation: we need to ask more questions. Semin Perinatol 2006;30:28–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark RH. The epidemiology of respiratory failure in neonates born at an estimated gestational age of 34 weeks or more. J Perinatol 2005;25:251–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen M, Carson BS. Respiratory morbidity benefit of awaiting onset of labor after elective cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1985;65:818–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison JJ, Rennie JM, Milton PJ. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:101–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zanardo V, Simbi AK, Franzoi M, et al. Neonatal respiratory morbidity risk and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean delivery. Acta Paediatr 2004;93:643–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bick D. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health; National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Caesarean Section. Clinical Guideline. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health: commissioned by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2004;1:198–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 394. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1501–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enkin M. Labor and delivery following previous caesarean section. In: Childbirth. London, UK: Oxford University Press; 1994:1196–1215.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen AK, Wisborg K, Uldbjerg N, Henriksen TB. Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective caesarean section: cohort study. BMJ 2008;336:85–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spong CY. Defining ‘term’ pregnancy: recommendations from the Defining ‘Term’ Pregnancy Workgroup. JAMA 2013; 309:2445–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: preliminary data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2006;55:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ, et al. Births: preliminary data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2005;54:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Tzur T, Weintraub AY, Sheiner E, et al. Timing of elective repeat caesarean section: maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;24:58–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziosi GC, Bakker CM, Brouwers HA, Bruinse HW. [Elective cesarean section is preferred after the completion of a minimum of 38 weeks of pregnancy]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1998;142:2300–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Madar J, Richmond S, Hey E. Surfactant-deficient respiratory distress after elective delivery at 'term'. Acta Paediatr 1999;88:1244–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg A, van Elburg RM, van Geijn HP, Fetter WP. Neonatal respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean section in term infants. A 5-year retrospective study and a review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001;98:9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanardo V, Simbi KA, Vedovato S, Trevisanuto D. The influence of timing of elective cesarean section on neonatal resuscitation risk. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2004;5:566–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Luca R, Boulvain M, Irion O, et al. Incidence of early neonatal mortality and morbidity after late-preterm and term cesarean delivery. Pediatrics 2009;123:e1064–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiossi G, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Timing of delivery and adverse outcomes in term singleton repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:561–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glavind J, Uldbjerg N. Elective cesarean delivery at 38 and 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal risks. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015;28:121–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, et al. The timing of elective caesarean delivery between 2000 and 2009 in England. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011;11:43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson CJ, Villers MS Johnson DD, Simpson KN. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes: a cost analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:632.e1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar