The association of placenta previa and assisted reproductive techniques: a meta-analysis

References

• Ernstad EG, Bergh C, Khatibi A, et al. Neonatal and maternal outcome after blastocyst transfer: a population-based registry study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:378. e1–e10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraretti A, Goossens V, De Mouzon J, European IVF-monitoring (EIM); Consortium for European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2571–2584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Mouzon J, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1851–1862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhorn MC. Middle Eastern masculinities in the age of new reproductive technologies: male infertility and stigma in Egypt and Lebanon. Med Anthropol Quart. 2004;18:162–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy J, Gannon C, McClure N, et al. Is assisted reproduction associated with abnormal placentation? Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2012;15:306–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevell T, Malone FD, Vidaver J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1039–1045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A, et al. Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI; a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2353–2358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schieve LA, Cohen B, Nannini A, et al. A population-based study of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology in Massachusetts. Matern Child Health J. 2007;11:517–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Källén B, Finnström O, Nygren KG, et al. In vitro fertilisation in Sweden: obstetric characteristics, maternal morbidity and mortality. BJOG. 2005;112:1529–1535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin J, Wang H, Sheng X, et al. Pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:1492–1508.e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell JA, Ronsmans C, Calvert C, et al. Prevalence of placenta praevia by world region: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Trop Med Int Health. 2013;18:712–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyelese Y. Placenta previa and related placental disorders. Queenan’s Management of High-Risk Pregnancy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. Vol. 382.
   Google Scholar
• Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. The effect of placenta previa on neonatal mortality: a population-based study in the United States, 1989 through 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:1299–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørgaard LN, Pinborg A, Lidegaard Ø, et al. A Danish national cohort study on neonatal outcome in singleton pregnancies with placenta previa. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:546–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg T, Pariente G, Sergienko R, et al. Critical analysis of risk factors and outcome of placenta previa. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284:47–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Li Y, Li C, et al. Current overview of pregnancy complications and live-birth outcome of assisted reproductive technology in mainland China. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:385–391.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananth CV, Savitz DA, Luther ER. Maternal cigarette smoking as a risk factor for placental abruption, placenta previa, and uterine bleeding in pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144:881–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson F, Shanbhag S, Templeton A, et al. Obstetric outcome in women with subfertility. BJOG. 2005;112:632–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takemura Y, Osuga Y, Fujimoto A, et al. Increased risk of placenta previa is associated with endometriosis and tubal factor infertility in assisted reproductive technology pregnancy. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:113–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin JB, Liu XY, Sheng XQ, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin JB, Wang H, Sheng X, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in dichorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1180–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo CK-L, Mertz D, Loeb M. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poorolajal J, Jenabi E. The association between body mass index and preeclampsia: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:3670–3676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi M, Nakai A, Satoh S, et al. Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:922–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson R, Gissler M, Tiitinen A. Obstetric outcome among women with unexplained infertility after IVF: a matched case-control study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1755–1761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poikkeus P, Tiitinen A. Does single embryo transfer improve the obstetric and neonatal outcome of singleton pregnancy? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:888–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sazonova A, Kllen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, et al. Factors affecting obstetric outcome of singletons born after IVF. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2878–2886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithers PR, Halliday J, Hale L, et al. High frequency of cesarean section, antepartum hemorrhage, placenta previa, and preterm delivery in in-vitro fertilization twin pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:666–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsutsumi R, Fujimoto A, Osuga Y, et al. Singleton pregnancy outcomes after assisted and non-assisted reproductive technology in infertile patients. Reprod Med Biol. 2012;11:149–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang H, Choi YS, Nam KH, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of dichorionic twin pregnancies according to methods of conception: spontaneous versus in-vitro fertilization. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2011;14:98–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan SL, Doyle P, Campbell S, et al. Obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilization pregnancies compared with normally conceived pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:778–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katalinic A, Rosch C, Ludwig M. Pregnancy course and outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a controlled, prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1604–1616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinszky Z, Zadori J, Orvos H, et al. Obstetric and neonatal risk of pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology: a matched control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:850–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reubinoff BE, Samueloff A, Ben-Haim M, et al. Is the obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilized singleton gestations different from natural ones? A controlled study. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:1077–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuivasaari-Pirinen P, Raatikainen K, Hippeläinen M, et al. Adverse outcomes of IVF/ICSI pregnancies vary depending on aetiology of infertility. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:451915.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Healy DL, Breheny S, Halliday J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for obstetric haemorrhage in 6730 singleton births after assisted reproductive technology in Victoria Australia. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:265–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal P, Loh SK, Lim SB, et al. Two-year neurodevelopmental outcome in children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection: prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2005;112:1376–1383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasario E, Borgarello V, Bossotti C, et al. IVF twins have similar obstetric and neonatal outcome as spontaneously conceived twins: a prospective follow-up study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21:422–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi SJ, Kim HS, Roh CR. Pregnancy outcomes of twins after in vitro and spontaneous fertilization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;94:49–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki S, Miyake H. Perinatal outcomes of elderly primiparous dichorionic twin pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization compared with those conceived spontaneously. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281:87–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke B, Gopal D, Cabral H, et al. Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations the Massachusetts outcomes study of assisted reproductive technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Forthcoming 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Zhang Y, Liu Y, et al. Maternal and live-birth outcomes of pregnancies following assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill GA, Bryan S, Herbert CM, III, et al. Complications of pregnancy in infertile couples: routine treatment versus assisted reproduction. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:790–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassar AH, Usta IM, Rechdan JB, et al. Pregnancy outcome in spontaneous twins versus twins who were conceived through in vitro fertilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:513–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii M, Matsuoka R, Bergel E, et al. Perinatal risk in singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:2113–2117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0. Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, et al. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:725–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavaniotou A, Albano C, Smitz J, et al. Impact of ovarian stimulation on corpus luteum function and embryonic implantation. J Reprod Immunol. 2002;55:123–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar