Medicolegal cases involving periviable births from a major United States legal database

References

• Campbell DE, Fleischman AR. Limits of viability: dilemmas, decisions, and decision makers. Am J Perinatol. 2001;18:117–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzuaga BH, Meadow W. National variability in neonatal resuscitation practices at the limit of viability. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31:521–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvey S, Partridge JC, Martinez AM, et al. The management of extremely premature infants and the perceptions of viability and parental counselling practices of Australian obstetricians. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;41:269–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh J, Fanaroff J, Andrews B, et al. Resuscitation in the “gray zone” of viability: determining physician preferences and predicting infant outcomes. Pediatrics. 2007;120:519–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seri I, Evans J. Limits of viability: definition of the gray zone. J Perinatol. 2008;28(Suppl.1):S4–S8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pignotti MS. The definition of human viability: a historical perspective. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99:33–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju TN, Mercer BM, Burchfield DJ, et al. Periviable birth: executive summary of a Joint Workshop by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. J Perinatol. 2014;34:333–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings J. Antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation and intensive care before 25 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 2015;136:588–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Periviable birth. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127:e157–e169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Janvier A, Barrington KJ. The ethics of neonatal resuscitation at the margins of viability: informed consent and outcomes. J Pediatr. 2005;147:579–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunkhorst J, Weiner J, Lantos J. Infants of borderline viability: the ethics of delivery room care. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19:290–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer GR, Nelson RM. A review of ethical issues involved in premature birth institute of medicine (US) committee on understanding premature birth and assuring healthy outcomes; preterm birth: causes, consequences, and prevention. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Sayeed SA. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Pediatrics. 2005;116:e576–e585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanaroff J, Turbow R. Legal issues in neonatal-perinatal medicine. In: Martin RJ, Fanaroff AA, Walsh MC, editors. Fanaroff and Martin’s neonatal-perinatal medicine. 10th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Mosby; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Turbow R, Fanaroff J. Legal issues in neonatal intensive care. Chapter 42, legal medicine. 7th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Mosby; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Annas GJ. Extremely preterm birth and parental authority to refuse treatment – the case of Sidney Miller. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2118–2123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• In re Infant Doe, No GU8204-004A (Ind Ct App Apr 12, 1982).
   Google Scholar
• Weber V Stony Brook Hospital. 60 n.y.2D 208 (1983).
   Google Scholar
• In the Matter of Baby K, 832 FSupp102 (EDVa 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Ballard DW, Li Y, Evans J, et al. Fear of litigation may increase resuscitation of infants born near the limits of viability. J Pediatr. 2002;140:713–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawdon JM, Beer J, Sharp D, et al. NHS Improvement Patient Safety Programme ‘Reducing Term Admissions to Neonatal Units’. Neonatal hypoglycaemia: learning from cases. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 [Epub ahead of print].
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WestlawNext online legal research. Available from: http://legalsolutions.thomson reuters.com/law-products/westlaw-legal-research
   Google Scholar
• Brown TW, McCarthy ML, Kelen GD, et al. An epidemiologic study of closed emergency department malpractice cases in a national database of physician malpractice insurers. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:553–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll AE, Buddenbaum JL. Malpractice cases involving pediatricians: epidemiology and etiology. Pediatrics. 2007;120:10–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selbst SM, Friedman MJ, Singh SB. Epidemiology and etiology of malpractice lawsuits involving children in US emergency departments and urgent care centers. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005;21:165–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen J, Cascione M, Noori S. Analysis of lawsuits related to point-of-care ultrasonography in neonatology and pediatric subspecialties. J Perinatol. 2016;36:784–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelfox HT, Gandhi TK, Orav EJ, et al. The relation of patient satisfaction with complaints against physicians and malpractice lawsuits. Am J Med. 2005;118:1126–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson GB, Clayton EW, Entman SS, et al. Obstetricians ‘prior malpractice experience and patients’ satisfaction with care. JAMA. 1994;272:1583–1587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore PJ, Adler NE, Robertson PA. Medical malpractice: the effect of doctor–patient relations on medical patient perceptions and malpractice intentions. West J Med. 2000;173:244–250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boss RD, Hutton N, Sulpar LJ, et al. Values parents apply to decision-making regarding delivery room resuscitation for high-risk newborns. Pediatrics. 2008;122:583–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillén Ú, Suh S, Munson D, et al. Development and pretesting of a decision-aid to use when counseling parents facing imminent extreme premature delivery. J Pediatr. 2012;160:382–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griswold KJ, Fanaroff JM. An evidence-based overview of prenatal consultation with a focus on infants born at the limits of viability. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e931–e937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivas SK. Periviable births: communication and counseling before delivery. Semin Perinatol. 2013;37:426–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seubert DE, Huang WM, Wasserman-Hoff R. Medical legal issues in the prevention of prematurity. Clin Perinatol. 2007;34:309–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TeamSTEPPS. Agency for healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/about-teamstepps/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Hoeldtke NJ, Calhoun BC. Perinatal hospice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:525–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limbo R, Brandon D, Côté-Arsenault D, et al. American Academy of Nursing policy brief, Perinatal palliative care as an essential element of childbearing choices. Nurs Outlook. 2017;65:123–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Available from: http://www.perinatalhospice.org/parent-voices.html
   Google Scholar