208
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

The association of between assisted reproduction technology and malpresentation/induction of labor: a meta-analysis

&
Pages 2782-2787 | Received 21 May 2017, Accepted 12 Jul 2017, Published online: 25 Jul 2017

References

  • Ginström Ernstad EG, Bergh C, Khatibi A, et al. Neonatal and maternal outcome after blastocyst transfer: a population-based registry study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(3):378.e1–378.e10.
  • Qin J, Liu X, Sheng X, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):73–85.e1.
  • Karami M, Jenabi E, Fereidooni B. The association of placenta previa and assisted reproductive techniques: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. Forthcoming. [cited 2017 Jun 6]. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1332035.
  • Sun LM, Lanes A, Kingdom JCP, et al. Intrapartum interventions for singleton pregnancies arising from assisted reproductive technologies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(9):795–802.
  • Elenis E, Svanberg AS, Lampic C, et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes in pregnancies resulting from oocyte donation: a retrospective cohort case study in Sweden. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):247.
  • Healy DL, Breheny S, Halliday J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for obstetric haemorrhage in 6730 singleton births after assisted reproductive technology in Victoria Australia. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(1):265–274.
  • Isaksson R, Gissler M, Tiitinen A. Obstetric outcome among women with unexplained infertility after IVF: a matched case–control study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(7):1755–1761.
  • Reubinoff BE, Samueloff A, Ben-Haim M, et al. Is the obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilized singleton gestations different from natural ones? A controlled study. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(6):1077–1083.
  • Kozinszky Z, Zádori J, Orvos H, et al. Obstetric and neonatal risk of pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology: a matched control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(9):850–856.
  • Poikkeus P, Gissler M, Unkila-Kallio L, et al. Obstetric and neonatal outcome after single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(4):1073–1079.
  • Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses Ontario. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2009. [cited 2014 March 25]. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
  • Poorolajal J, Jenabi E. The association between body mass index and preeclampsia: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(22):3670–3676.
  • Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–560.
  • Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088–1101.
  • DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–188.
  • Thomson F, Shanbhag S, Templeton A, et al. Obstetric outcome in women with subfertility. BJOG. 2005;112(5):632–637.
  • Tomic V, Tomic J. Neonatal outcome of IVF singletons versus naturally conceived in women aged 35 years and over. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(6):1411–1416.
  • Dhont M, De Sutter P, Ruyssinck G, et al. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction: a case–control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(3):688–695.
  • Frydman R, Belaisch-Allart J, Fries N, et al. An obstetric assessment of the first 100 births from the in vitro fertilization program at Clamart, France. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;154(3):550–555.
  • Zádori J, Kozinszky Z, Orvos H, et al. Dilemma of increased obstetric risk in pregnancies following IVF-ET. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20(6):216–221.
  • Romundstad LB, Romundstad PR, Sunde A, et al. Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI; a comparison of ART and non-art pregnancies in the same mother. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(9):2353–2358.
  • Biderman-Madar T, Sheiner E, Levy A, et al. Uterine leiomyoma among women who conceived following fertility treatment. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;272(3):218–222.
  • Jenabi E, Khazaei S. The effect of uterine leiomyoma on the risk of malpresentation and cesarean: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. Forthcoming. [cited 2017 Jan 17]. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2016.1275553.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.