References
- EURO-PERISTAT Project with SCPE EUROCAT EURONEOSTAT. European Perinatal Health Report. Data from 2004; 2008. Available from: http://www.europeristat.com/images/doc/EPHR/european-perinatal-health-report.pdf
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, et al. Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011;60:1–70.
- Alfirevic Z, Kelly AJ, Dowswell T. Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;114:386–393.
- Niromanesh S, Mosavi-Jarrahi A, Samkhaniani F. Intracervical Foley catheter balloon vs. prostaglandin in preinduction cervical ripening. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;81(1):23–27.
- Mizrachi Y, Levy M, Bar J, et al. Induction of labor in nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: a comparison of Foley catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(4):725–730.
- Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, et al. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(3):CD001233.
- Chen W, Xue J, Peprah MK, et al. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;123(3):346–354.
- Jozwiak M, Ten Eikelder M, Oude Rengerink K, et al. Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol: randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-M study) and systematic review and meta-analysis of literature. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31(2):145–156.
- Wang H, Hong S, Liu Y, et al. Controlled-release dinoprostone insert versus Foley catheter for labor induction: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:2382–2388.
- Rabl M, Joura EA, Yücel Y, et al. A randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E2 for induction of labor. Insert vs. tablet. J Reprod Med. 2002;47(2):115–119.
- Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Agosti M, et al. Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(4):338.e1–338.e7.
- Zheng MM, Hu YL, Zhang SM, et al. Trans-cervical Foley catheter balloon versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 suppository for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Chin J Perinat Med. 2011;14:648–652.
- Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Uccella S, et al. A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(2):125.e1–125.e7.
- Wang ZM, Wang L, Han LL, et al. Propess suppository and trans-cervical Foley catheter balloon for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Chin Gen Pract. 2012;15:3264–3267.
- Edwards RK, Szychowski JM, Berger JL, et al. Foley catheter compared with the controlled-release dinoprostone insert: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1280–1287.
- Jozwiak M, Oude Rengerink K, Ten Eikelder ML, et al. Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(1):137–145.
- Laughon SK, Zhang J, Grewal J, et al. Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(6):486.e1–486.e9.
- Rouse DJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. Criteria for failed labor induction: prospective evaluation of a standardized protocol. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(5 Pt 1):671–677.
- Wolfe KB, Rossi RA, Warshak CR. The effect of maternal obesity on the rate of failed induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(2):128.e1–128.e7.