Defining fetal growth restriction: abdominal circumference as an alternative criterion

References

• Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, et al. Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(4):290.e1–290.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copel JA, Bahtiyar MO. A practical approach to fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(5):1057–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(5):1122–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM. Distinguishing pathological from constitutional small for gestational age births in population-based studies. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85(10):653–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness UF, Mari G. Diagnosis and management of intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Perinatol. 2004;31(4):743–64, vi.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Gupta LM, Hendrix NW, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin with other national guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(4):409.e1–409.e6.
   Google Scholar
• Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, et al. Definition and management of fetal growth restriction: a survey of contemporary attitudes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;174:41–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists The investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Green-top guideline. no. 31. London (UK): Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lausman A, Kingdom J, Maternal Fetal Medicine Committee. Intrauterine growth restriction: screening, diagnosis, and management. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(8):741–748.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang J, Merialdi M, Platt LD, et al. Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(6):522–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warsof SL, Cooper DJ, Little D, et al. Routine ultrasound screening for antenatal detection of intrauterine growth retardation. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67(1):33–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown HL, Miller JM Jr, Gabert HA, et al. Ultrasonic recognition of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69(4):631–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarmandal P, Grant JM. Effectiveness of ultrasound determination of fetal abdominal circumference and fetal ponderal index in the diagnosis of asymmetrical growth retardation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97(2):118–123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chambers SE, Hoskins PR, Haddad NG, et al. A comparison of fetal abdominal circumference measurements and Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of small-for-dates babies and fetal compromise. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96(7):803–808.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang TC, Robson SC, Boys RJ, et al. Prediction of the small for gestational age infant: which ultrasonic measurement is best? Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80(6):1030–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David CG, Tagliavini G, Pilu G, et al. Receiver–operator characteristic curves for the ultrasonographic prediction of small-for-gestational-age fetuses in low-risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(3):1037–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Cole J, Sanderson M, et al. Suspicion of intrauterine growth restriction: use of abdominal circumference alone or estimated fetal weight below 10%. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;19(9):557–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott WJ. Diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of ultrasound parameters. Am J Perinatol. 2002;19(3):133–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayem G, Grangé G, Bréart G, et al. Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(5):566–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Lorenzo GL, Monasta L, Ceccarello M, et al. Third trimester abdominal circumference, estimated fetal weight and uterine artery Doppler for the identification of newborns small and large for gestational age. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;166(2):133–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turitz AL, Quant H, Schwartz N, et al. Isolated abdominal circumference <5% or estimated fetal weight 10 to 19% as predictors of small for gestational age infants. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31(6):469–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees C, Marlow N, Arabin B, et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(4):400–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion no 611: method for estimating due date. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(4):863–866.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, et al. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements – a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(3):333–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, et al. Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiology. 1984;152(2):497–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology. 1991;181(1):129–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, et al. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(2):163–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(3):837–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senoh D, Hata T, Kitao M. Fetal liver length measurement does not provide a superior means for prediction of a small for gestational age fetus. Am J Perinatol. 1994;11(5):344–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts AB, Mitchell JM, McCowan LM, et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of liver length in the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(3 Pt 1):634–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar