153
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The yield of chromosomal microarray analysis among pregnancies terminated due to fetal malformations

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 336-340 | Received 16 Apr 2019, Accepted 13 Jan 2020, Published online: 23 Jan 2020

References

  • Levy B, Wapner R. Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(2):201–212.
  • Vanakker O, Vilain C, Janssens K, et al. Implementation of genomic arrays in prenatal diagnosis: the Belgian approach to meet the challenges. Eur J Med Genet. 2014;57(4):151–156.
  • Srebniak MI, Diderich KEM, Joosten M, et al. Prenatal SNP array testing in 1000 fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: causative, unexpected and susceptibility CNVs. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24(5):645–651.
  • Hillman SC, McMullan DJ, Hall G, et al. Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(6):610–620.
  • Shaffer LG, Dabell MP, Fisher AJ, et al. Experience with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(10):976–985.
  • Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(23):2175–2184.
  • Hay SB, Sahoo T, Travis MK, et al. ACOG and SMFM guidelines for prenatal diagnosis: is karyotyping really sufficient? Prenat Diagn. 2018;38(3):184–189.
  • Shaffer LG, Rosenfeld JA, Dabell MP, et al. Detection rates of clinically significant genomic alterations by microarray analysis for specific anomalies detected by ultrasound. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(10):986–995.
  • Faas BHW, Van Der Burgt I, Kooper AJA, et al. Identification of clinically significant, submicroscopic chromosome alterations and UPD in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies using genome-wide 250k SNP array analysis. J Med Genet. 2010;47(9):586–594.
  • Donnelly JC, Platt LD, Rebarber A, et al. Association of copy number variants with specific ultrasonographically detected fetal anomalies. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(1):83–90.
  • Kearney HM, Thorland EC, Brown KK, et al. American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants. Genet Med. 2011;13(7):680–685.
  • Lee CN, Lin SY, Lin CH, et al. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies. BJOG. 2012;119(5):614–625.
  • Fiorentino F, Napoletano S, Caiazzo F, et al. Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-line test in pregnancies with a priori low risk for the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21(7):725–730.
  • Sagi-Dain L, Maya I, Reches A, et al. Chromosomal microarray analysis results from pregnancies with various ultrasonographic anomalies. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(6):1368–1375.
  • Rudolf G, Lovrečić L, Tul N, et al. The frequency of CNV s in a cohort population of consecutive fetuses with congenital anomalies after the termination of pregnancy. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019;7(6):e658.
  • Los FJ, van Den Berg C, Wildschut HI, et al. The diagnostic performance of cytogenetic investigation in amniotic fluid cells and chorionic villi. Prenat Diagn. 2001;21(13):1150–1158.
  • Sikkema-Raddatz B, Suijkerbuijk R, Bouman K, et al. Quality aspects of prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis: determining the effect of various factors involved in handling amniotic fluid and chorionic villus material for cytogenetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26(9):791–800.
  • Reid R, Sepulveda W, Kyle PM, et al. Amniotic fluid culture failure: clinical significance and association with aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(4):588–592.
  • Sahoo T, Dzidic N, Strecker MN, et al. Comprehensive genetic analysis of pregnancy loss by chromosomal microarrays: outcomes, benefits, and challenges. Genet Med. 2017;19(1):83–89.
  • Yates CL, Monaghan KG, Copenheaver D, et al. Whole-exome sequencing on deceased fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: expanding our knowledge of genetic disease during fetal development. Genet Med. 2017;19(10):1171–1178.
  • Jelin AC, Vora N. Whole exome sequencing: applications in prenatal genetics. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018;45(1):69–81.
  • Chandler N, Best S, Hayward J, et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis using targeted exome sequencing: a cohort study to assess feasibility and potential impact on prenatal counseling and pregnancy management. Genet Med. 2018;20(11):1430–1437.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.