309
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Cesarean scar thickness in non-pregnant women as a risk factor for uterine rupture

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 389-394 | Received 24 Aug 2019, Accepted 17 Jan 2020, Published online: 28 Jan 2020

References

  • Guise JM, Denman MA, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1267–1278.
  • Fitzpatrick KE, Kurinczuk JJ, Alfirevic Z, et al. Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a National Case-Control Study. PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001184.
  • Bujold E, Goyet M, Marcoux S, et al. The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(1):43–50.
  • Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, et al. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):19–25.
  • Diaz SD, Jones JE, Seryakov M, et al. Uterine rupture and dehiscence: ten-year review and case-control study. South Med J. 2002;95(4):431–435.
  • Jastrow N, Chaillet N, Roberge S, et al. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32(4):321–327.
  • Roberge S, Demers S, Girard M, et al. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(4):507.e1–507.e6.
  • Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Philippe HJ, et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet. 1996;347(8997):281–284.
  • Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J, et al. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(3):320.e1–320.e6.
  • Uharček P, Brešťanský A, Ravinger J, et al. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous cesarean delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(3):609–612.
  • Naji O, Wynants L, Smith A, et al. Predicting successful vaginal birth after cesarean section using a model based on cesarean scar features examined by transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(6):672–678.
  • Kok N, Wiersma IC, Opmeer BC, et al. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(2):132–139.
  • Vikhareva Osser O, Valentin L. Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):525–532.
  • Pomorski M, Fuchs T, Zimmer M. Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2014;14:365.
  • Glavind J, Madsen LD, Uldbjerg N, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(2):207–212.
  • Colmorn LB, Petersen KB, Jakobsson M, et al. The Nordic obstetric surveillance study: a study of complete uterine rupture, abnormally invasive placenta, peripartum hysterectomy, and severe blood loss at delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(7):734–744.
  • Naji O, Abdallah Y, Bij De Vaate AJ, et al. Standardized approach for imaging and measuring cesarean section scars using ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(3):252–259.
  • Jordans IPM, de Leeuw R, Stegwee SI, et al. Sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi procedure.. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(1):107–115.
  • Dicle O, Küçükler C, Pirnar T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of incision healing after cesarean sections. Eur Radiol. 1997;7(1):31–34.
  • Sundtoft I, Sommer S, Uldbjerg N. Cervical collagen concentration within 15 months after delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(1):59.e1–59.e3
  • Varner MW, Leindecker S, Spong CY, et al. The Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Cesarean Registry: trial of labor with a twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):135–140.
  • Ford AA, Bateman BT, Simpson LL. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: a large, nationwide sample of deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(4):1138–1142.
  • Cahill A, Stamilio DM, Paré E, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt in twin pregnancies: is it safe? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3):1050–1055.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.