IVF/ICSI treatment and the risk of iatrogenic preterm birth in singleton pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

References

• Howson CP, Kinney MV, Lawn JE. Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth. March of dimes, PMNCH, save the children, WHO. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(5):485–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavoretto P, Candiani M, Giorgione V, et al. Risk of spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies conceived after IVF/ICSI treatment: meta-analysis of cohort studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(1):43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beral V, Doyle P. Births in Great Britain resulting from assisted conception, 1978–87. MRC working party on children conceived by in vitro fertilisation. BMJ. 1990;300:1229–1233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katalinic A, Rösch C, Ludwig M. Pregnancy course and outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a controlled, prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(6):1604–1616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koudstaal J, Braat DDM, Bruinse HW, et al. Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies after IVF: a matched control study in four Dutch university hospitals. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(8):1819–1825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochsenkühn R, Strowitzki T, Gurtner M, et al. Pregnancy complications, obstetric risks, and neonatal outcome in singleton and twin pregnancies after GIFT and IVF. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003;268(4):256–261.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olivennes F, Rufat P, André B, et al. The increased risk of complication observed in singleton pregnancies resulting from in-vitro fertilization (IVF) does not seem to be related to the IVF method itself. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(8):1297–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perri T, Chen R, Yoeli R, et al. Clinical assisted reproduction: are singleton assisted reproductive technology pregnancies at risk of prematurity? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001;18(5):245–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reubinoff BE, Samueloff A, Ben-Haim M, et al. Is the obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilized singleton gestations different from natural ones? A controlled study. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(6):1077–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seggers J, Pontesilli M, Ravelli ACJ, et al. Effects of in vitro fertilization and maternal characteristics on perinatal outcomes: a population-based study using siblings. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(3):590–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevell T, Malone FD, Vidaver J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1039–1045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojnic J, Radunovic N, Jeremic K, et al. Perinatal outcome of singleton pregnancies following in vitro fertilization. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2:277–283.
   Google Scholar
• Tan SL, Doyle P, Campbell S, et al. Obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilization pregnancies compared with normally conceived pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167(3):778–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanbo T, Dale PO, Lunde O, et al. Obstetric outcome in singleton pregnancies after assisted reproduction. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86(2):188–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomic V, Tomic J. Neonatal outcome of IVF singletons versus naturally conceived in women aged 35 years and over. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(6):1411–1416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlaenen H, Cammu H, Derde MP, et al. Singleton pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: expectations and outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86(6):906–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JX, Norman RJ, Kristiansson P. The effect of various infertility treatments on the risk of preterm birth. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(4):945–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennerholm UB, Hamberger L, Nilsson L, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcome of children conceived from cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(8):1819–1825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavoretto P, Giorgione V, Sotiriadis A, et al. IVF/ICSI treatment and the risk of iatrogenic preterm birth in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019117672; 2019. Available from: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019117672
   Google Scholar
• van ʼt Hooft J, Duffy JM, Daly M, et al. A core outcome set for evaluation of interventions to prevent preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(1):49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connel D, et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses; 2010. Available from: www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–1558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated 2011 Mar]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from: http://handbook.cochrane.org
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Open Med. 2009;3:123–130.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romero R, Dey SK, Fisher SJ. Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes. Science. 2014;345(6198):760–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin J, Liu X, Sheng X, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):73–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders DM, Mathews M, Lancaster P. The Australian Register: current research and future role. A preliminary report. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;541:7–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisborg K, Ingerslev HJ, Henriksen TB. In vitro fertilization and preterm delivery, low birth weight, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit: a prospective follow-up study. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2102–2106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavoretto P, Dallagiovanna C, Vigano P, et al. First trimester combined screening test in pregnancies derived from blastocyst transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;198:50–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavoretto P, Giorgione V, Cipriani S, et al. Nuchal translucency measurement, free β-hCG and PAPP-A concentrations in IVF/ICSI pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37(6):540–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone IF, Cruz JJ, Sarquis R, et al. Assisted conception and placental perfusion assessed by uterine artery Doppler at 11–13 weeks' gestation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(7):1659–1664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prefumo F, Fratelli N, Soares SC, et al. Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry at 11–14 weeks in singleton pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29(2):141–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inversetti A, Mandia L, Candiani M, et al. Uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index at 11–38 weeks in ICSI pregnancies with egg donation. J Perinat Med. 2018;46(1):21–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berntsen S, Pinborg A. Large for gestational age and macrosomia in singletons born after frozen/thawed embryo transfer (FET) in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Birth Defects Res. 2018;110(8):630–643.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinborg A, Loft A, Aaris Henningsen AK, et al. Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen embryo replacement: the Danish National Cohort Study 1995–2006. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1320–1327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermey BG, Buchanan A, Chambers GM, et al. Are singleton pregnancies after assisted reproduction technology (ART) associated with a higher risk of placental anomalies compared with non-ART singleton pregnancies? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2019;126(2):209–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC, et al. Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):613–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberge S, Bujold E, Nicolaides KH. Meta-analysis on the effect of aspirin use for prevention of preeclampsia on placental abruption and antepartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(5):483–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaides KH. Turning the pyramid of prenatal care. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;29(3):183–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonek JD, Kagan KO, Nicolaides KH. Inverted pyramid of care. Clin Lab Med. 2016;36(2):305–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar