The association of skin incision placement during cesarean delivery with wound complications in obese women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. World Health Organization; 2000 [cited 2020 Jun 26]. Available from: who.int/nutrition/publications/obesity/WHO_TRS_894/en/
   Google Scholar
• Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, et al. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the united states, 2011–2012. JAMA. 2014;311(8):806–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalano PM, Koutrouvelis GO. Obesity in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:e112–e126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion no. 549: obesity in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:213–217.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayres-de-Campos D. Obesity and the challenges of caesarean delivery: prevention and management of wound complications. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;29(3):406–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu S, Kim S, Schmid C, et al. Maternal obesity and risk of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2007;8(5):385–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood DD, Dewan DM. Anesthetic and obstetric outcome in morbidly obese parturients. Anesthesiology. 1993;79(6):1210–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner SN, Verticchio JC, Tuuli MG, et al. Maternal obesity and risk of postcesarean wound complications. Amer J Perinatol. 2013;31(4):299–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneid‐Kofman N, Sheiner E, Levy A, et al. Risk factors for wound infection following cesarean deliveries. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005;90(1):10–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermillion ST, Lamoutte C, Soper DE, et al. Wound infection after cesarean: effect of subcutaneous tissue thickness. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(6 Pt 1):923–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocato BE, Thorpe EM, Gomez LM, et al. The effect of cesarean delivery skin incision approach in morbidly obese women on the rate of classical hysterotomy. J Preg. 2013;2013:1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Mackeen AD, Schuster M, Berghella V. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(5):621.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen J, Andrews WW. Wound complications after cesarean sections. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;37(4):842–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson HE, O'Connell CM, Joseph KS, et al. Maternal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by obesity. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:1357–1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipton AM, Cohen SA, Chelmow D. Wound infection in the obese pregnant woman. Semin Perinatol. 2011;35(6):345–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran TS, Jamulitrat S, Chongsuvivatwong V, et al. Risk factors for postcesarean surgical site infection1. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:367–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamasato K, Yoshino K, Chang AL, et al. Cesarean delivery complications in women with morbid obesity. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(23):3885–3888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poobalan AS, Aucott LS, Gurung T, et al. Obesity as an independent risk factor for elective and emergency caesarean delivery in nulliparous women-systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Obes Rev. 2009;10(1):28–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, et al. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(9):712–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelmow D, Rodriguez EJ, Sabatini MM. Suture closure of subcutaneous fat and wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(5 Pt 1):974–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellums EK, Lin MG, Ramsey PS. Prophylactic subcutaneous drainage for prevention of wound complications after cesarean delivery-a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(3):229–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Rouse DJ, et al. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(4):294–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smid MC, Smiley SG, Schulkin J, et al. Stuebe AM. The problem of the pannus: physician preference survey and a review of the literature on cesarean skin incision in morbidly obese women. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33(5):463–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib AS, Wahl K, Gu J, Adenosine Study Group, et al. Comparison of postoperative pain outcomes after vertical or Pfannenstiel incision for major gynecologic surgery. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25(6):1529–1534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisielinski K, Conze J, Murken AH, et al. The Pfannenstiel or so called “bikini cut”: still effective more than 100 years after first description. Hernia. 2004;8(3):177–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al-Inany H, Youssef G, Abd ElMaguid A, et al. Value of subcutaneous drainage system in obese females undergoing cesarean section using pfannenstiel incision. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002;53(2):75–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuffaha HW, Gillespie BM, Chaboyer W, et al. Cost-utility analysis of negative pressure wound therapy in high-risk cesarean section wounds. J Surg Res. 2015;195(2):612–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark KS, Alger L, Terplan M. Incisional negative pressure therapy to prevent wound complications following cesarean section in morbidly obese women: a pilot study. Surg Innov. 2014;21(4):345–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smid MC, Dotters-Katz SK, Grace M, et al. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy for obese women after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(5):969–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumann RW, Hauth JC, Owen J, et al. Subcutaneous tissue approximation in relation to wound disruption after cesarean delivery in obese women. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(3):412–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tixier H, Thouvenot S, Coulange L, et al. Cesarean section in morbidly obese women: supra or subumbilical transverse incision? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(9):1049–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall PD, Deucy EE, Glantz JC, et al. Vertical skin incisions and wound complications in the obese parturient. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:952–956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alanis MC, Villers MS, Law TL, et al. Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(3):271.e1–e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell J, Bell S, Vahratian A, et al. Abdominal surgical incisions and perioperative morbidity among morbidly obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154(1):16–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean M, Hines R, Polinkovsky M, et al. Type of skin incision and wound complications in the obese parturient. Amer J Perinatol. 2012;29(04):301–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornburg LL, Linder MA, Durie DE, Walker B, et al. Risk factors for wound complications in morbidly obese women undergoing primary cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(9):1544–1548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrs CC, Moussa HN, Sibai BM, et al. REMOVED: The relationship between primary cesarean delivery skin incision type and wound complications in women with morbid obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(4):319–319.e4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadzia HK, Patel EM, Joshi D, et al. Obstetric surgical site infections: 2 grams compared with 3 grams of cefazolin in morbidly obese women. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(4):708–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smid MC, Kearney MS, Stamilio DM. Extreme obesity and postcesarean wound complications in the maternal-fetal medicine unit cesarean registry. Amer J Perinatol. 2015;32(14):1336–1341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton AL, Sanders LB, Subramaniam A, et al. Abdominal incision selection for cesarean delivery of women with class III obesity. Amer J Perinatol. 2015;33(06):547–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton RB, Shnaekel KL, Ounpraseuth ST, et al. High transverse skin incisions may reduce wound complications in obese women having cesarean sections: a pilot study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(5):781–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrs C, Blackwell S, Hester A, et al. Pfannenstiel versus vertical skin incision for cesarean delivery in women with Class III Obesity: a randomized trial. Am J Perinatol. 2019;36(1):97–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wihbey KA, Joyce EM, Spalding ZT, et al. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy and wound complication after cesarean delivery in women with class II or III obesity: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(2):377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looby MA, Vogel RI, Bangdiwala A, et al. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in Obese Patients Following Cesarean Delivery. Surg Innov. 2018;25(1):43–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Sayed HM, El Mekkawi SF, El Kotb AM, et al. Transverse supraumbilical versus Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean section in morbidly obese women “A randomized controlled trial. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2018; 72(7):4780–4785.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, PRISMA-P Group, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar