Vaginal birth after cesarean in women with pre-labor rupture of membranes at term

References

• Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, et al. Births: final data for 2017. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018;67(8):1–50.
   Google Scholar
• Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief. 2010;35:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. The change in the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean section. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011;25(1):37–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbard JU, Ismail MA, Wang Y, et al. Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(7):1365–1373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner MJ, Agnew G, Langan H. Uterine rupture and labour after a previous low transverse caesarean section. BJOG. 2006;113(6):729–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YW, Eden KB, Marshall N, et al. Delivery after prior cesarean: maternal morbidity and mortality. Clin Perinatol. 2011;38(2):297–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guise JM, Denman MA, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1267–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oboro V, Adewunmi A, Ande A, et al. Morbidity associated with failed vaginal birth after cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(9):1229–1232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA. Rates and prediction of successful vaginal birth after cesarean. Semin Perinatol. 2010;34(4):244–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beloosesky R, Khatib N, Ganem N, et al. Cervical length measured before delivery and the success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2018;31(4):464–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):806–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong C, et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3):1016–1023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickhardt MG, Martin JN, Jr, Meydrech EF, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: are there useful and valid predictors of success or failure? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(6 Pt 1):1811–1819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troyer LR, Parisi VM. Obstetric parameters affecting success in a trial of labor: designation of a scoring system. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;182:257–262.
   Google Scholar
• Tran SH, Cheng YW, Kaimal AJ, et al. Length of rupture of membranes in the setting of premature rupture of membranes at term and infectious maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(6):700.e1–e5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton P, Shepherd E, Flenady V, et al. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1:CD005302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouzounian JG, Miller DA, Hiebert CJ, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: risk of uterine rupture with labor induction. Amer J Perinatol. 2011;28(08):593–596.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith GC, White IR, Pell JP, et al. Predicting cesarean section and uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after prior cesarean section. PLoS Med. 2005;2(9):e252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Shaikh G, Al-Mandeel H. The outcomes of trial of labour after cesarean section following induction of labour compared to spontaneous labour. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287(6):1099–1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Pregnancy outcomes of induced labor in women with previous cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291(2):273–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott JR. Intrapartum management of trial of labour after caesarean delivery: evidence and experience. BJOG. 2014;121(2):157–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Grivell RM, et al. Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;12:CD004906.
   Google Scholar
• Prevention of Early-onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Disease: Green-top Guideline No. 36. BJOG. 2017;124(12):e280–e305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Group B strep (GBS) – prevention guidelines. [cited 2019 Jun 11] Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5910.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fishel BM, Sibai BM, Ilan H, et al. Trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) in women with premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;17:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Scifres CM, Rohn A, Odibo A, et al. Predicting significant maternal morbidity in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean section. Am J Perinatol. 2011;28(3):181–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palatnik A, Grobman WA. Induction of labor versus expectant management for women with a prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(3):358.e1–e6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker GA, Chan A, Luke CG, et al. Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2010;117(11):1358–1365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz TD, Stoddard GJ, Henry E, et al. Simple, validated vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model for use at the time of admission. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(3):571–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean? Amer J Perinatol. 2009;26(10):693–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris BS, Heine RP, Park J, et al. Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean accurate? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(5):492.e1–492.e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maykin MM, Mularz AJ, Lee LK, et al. Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery reveals unexpected success in a diverse American population. AJP Rep. 2017;7(1):e31–e38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox NS, Namath AG, Ali M, et al. Vaginal birth after a cesarean delivery for arrest of descent. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(16):2638–2642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewkowitz AK, Nakagawa S, Thiet M-P, et al. Effect of stage of initial labor dystocia on vaginal birth after cesarean success. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213:861.e1–e5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar