References
- Prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders Practice Bulletin No. 162. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127:e108–e122.
- Hotun Sahin N, Gungor I. Congenital anomalies: parents’ anxiety and women’s concerns before prenatal testing and women’s opinions towards the risk factors. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(6):827–836.
- Pastore LM, Rubin LR, SantaBarbara JN, et al. Initial psychometric analysis of novel instruments to assess decisional distress and decisional uncertainty in women who have considered using preimplantation genetic testing. Prenat Diagn. 2020;40(10):1220–1227.
- Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381.
- Pastore LM, Cordeiro Mitchell CN, Rubin LR, et al. Patients’ preimplantation genetic testing decision-making experience: an opinion on related psychological frameworks. Hum Reprod Open. 2019;2019(4):hoz019.
- Cella D, Hughes C, Peterman A, et al. A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the multidimensional impact of cancer risk assessment (MICRA) questionnaire. Health Psychol. 2002;21(6):564–572.
- Murray MA, Miller T, Fiset V, et al. Decision support: helping patients and families to find a balance at the end of life. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2004;10(6):270–277.
- O’Connor AM, Jacobsen MJ, Stacey D. An evidence-based approach to managing women’s decisional conflict. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002;31(5):570–581.
- O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15(1):25–30.
- Seth SG, Goka T, Harbison A, et al. Exploring the role of religiosity and spirituality in amniocentesis decision-making among latinas. J Genet Couns. 2011;20(6):660–673.
- Bringman JJ. Invasive prenatal genetic testing: a catholic healthcare provider’s perspective. Linacre Q. 2014;81(4):302–313.
- Saunders WP. What is the Church’s position on prenatal diagnosis and fetal research? Catholic Straight Answers Web site; [cited 2020 May 21]. Available from: http://catholicstraightanswers.com/what-is-the-churchs-position-on-prenatal-diagnosis-and-fetal-research/.
- Tursinawati Y, Thain S, Choi C, et al. Amniocentesis increases level of anxiety in women with invasive prenatal diagnosis of down syndrome. UnivMed. 2015;34(2):112.
- Richards EG, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, McGuire AL, et al. Pregnant patients’ risk perception of prenatal test results with uncertain fetal clinical significance: ultrasound versus advanced genetic testing. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35(12):1213–1217.
- Richardson A, Ormond KE. Ethical considerations in prenatal testing: genomic testing and medical uncertainty. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;23(1):1–6.
- Walser SA, Kellom KS, Palmer SC, et al. Comparing genetic counselor’s and patient’s perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35(9):870–878.
- Hoskovec J, Mastrobattista JM, Johnston D, Kerrigan A, et al. Anxiety and prenatal testing: do women with soft ultrasound findings have increased anxiety compared to women with other indications for testing? Prenat. Diagn. 2008;28(2):135–140.
- Goodman J. Procedural risks versus theology: chorionic villus sampling for orthodox jews at less than 8 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(1):309.
- Haimov-Kochman R, Hochner-Celinkier D. Contraceptive counseling for orthodox Jewish women. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007;12(1):13–18.
- Muller C, Cameron LD. Trait anxiety, information modality, and responses to communications about prenatal genetic testing. J Behav Med. 2014;37(5):988–999.
- Hertling E, Perrotin F, de Poncheville L, et al. G B. maternal anxiety related to prenatal screening and invasive testing: detection and management. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2001;29:440–446.
- Bot-Robin V, Sendon S, Bourzoufi K, et al. Maternal anxiety and pain during prenatal diagnostic techniques: a prospective study. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(6):562–568.