Intra-arterial lidocaine for pain control after uterine artery embolization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

References

• Keung JJ, Spies JB, Caridi TM. Uterine artery embolization: a review of current concepts, Best practice & research. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;46:66–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruijn AM, Smink M, Lohle PNM, et al. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(12):1629–1642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruijn AM, Ankum WM, Reekers JA, et al. Uterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 10-year outcomes from the randomized EMMY trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(6):745.e1–745.e12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki M, Tokue H, Miyazaki M, et al. Primary postpartum hemorrhage: outcome of uterine artery embolization. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20180132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hehenkamp WJ, Volkers NA, Birnie E, et al. Symptomatic uterine fibroids: treatment with uterine artery embolization or hysterectomy–results from the randomized clinical embolisation versus hysterectomy (EMMY) trial. Radiology. 2008;246(3):823–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheurig-Muenkler C, Koesters C, Powerski MJ, et al. Clinical long-term outcome after uterine artery embolization: sustained symptom control and improvement of quality of life. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(6):765–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira K, Salamo RM, Morel-Ovalle LM, et al. Ropivacaine-induced local anesthetic systemic toxicity after superior hypogastric nerve block for pain control after uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(9):1315–1317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon J, Valenti D, Muchantef K, et al. Superior hypogastric nerve block as post-uterine artery embolization analgesia: a randomized and double-blind clinical trial. Radiology. 2018;289(1):248–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjoreski A, Gjoreski J, Nancheva A. Uterine fibroid embolization via transradial versus transfemoral arterial access: technical results. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(4):579–582.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saibudeen A, Makris GC, Elzein A, et al. Pain management protocols during uterine fibroid embolisation: a systematic review of the evidence. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42(12):1663–1677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer EB, Stratil P, Mizones H. Clinical and periprocedural pain management for uterine artery embolization. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013;30(4):354–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-David B, Kaligozhin Z, Viderman D. Quadratus lumborum block in management of severe pain after uterine artery embolization. Eur J Pain. 2018;22(6):1032–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsumori T, Arima H, Asai S, et al. Comparison of pain within 24 h after uterine artery embolization with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres versus gelatin sponge particles for leiomyoma. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2017;40(11):1687–1693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkert CA, Hirzel FC, Gutzeit A, et al. Superior hypogastric nerve block to reduce pain after uterine artery embolization: advanced technique and comparison to epidural anesthesia. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2015;38(5):1157–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvnjak S, Andersen PE. Intra-arterial lidocaine administration during uterine fibroid embolization to reduce the immediate postoperative pain: a prospective randomized study. CVIR Endovasc. 2020;3(1):10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noel-Lamy M, Tan KT, Simons ME, et al. Intra-arterial lidocaine for pain control in uterine artery embolization: a prospective, randomized study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(1):16–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyoung JA, Levy EB, Roth AR, et al. Intra-arterial lidocaine for pain control after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12(9):1065–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Hahn ST, Park SH. Intra-arterial lidocaine administration for relief of pain resulting from transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: its effectiveness and optimal timing of administration. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001;24(6):368–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Huang W, Zhang S, et al. Efficacy of glutathione for patients with cystic fibrosis: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled studies. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2020;34(1):115–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(11):982–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–1558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsumori T, Miura H, Yoshikawa T, et al. Intra-arterial lidocaine administration for anesthesia after uterine artery embolization with trisacryl gelatin microspheres for leiomyoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31(1):114–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HS, Czuczman GJ, Nicholson WK, et al. Pain levels within 24 hours after UFE: a comparison of morphine and fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008;31(6):1100–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan S, Li Y, Wang G, et al. Effectiveness of intra-arterial anesthesia for uterine fibroid embolization using dilute lidocaine. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(8):1752–1756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar