320
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Nomogram to predict the risk of preterm birth before 37 weeks and 34 weeks in pregnant women with a short cervix

, , , , , & show all
Pages 4653-4662 | Received 07 Jun 2020, Accepted 04 Dec 2020, Published online: 15 Dec 2020

References

  • Wen SW, Smith G, Yang Q, et al. Epidemiology of preterm birth and neonatal outcome. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004;9(6):429–435.
  • Goldenberg RL, Rouse DJ. Prevention of premature birth. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(5):313–320.
  • Odibo AO, Ural SH, Macones GA. The prospects for multiple-marker screening for preterm delivery: does transvaginal ultrasound of the cervix have a central role? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May;19(5):429–435.
  • Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, et al. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: relation to demographic characteristics and previous obstetric history. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12(5):304–311.
  • Leitich H, Brunbauer M, Kaider A, et al. Cervical length and dilatation of the internal cervical os detected by vaginal ultrasonography as markers for preterm delivery: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(6):1465–1472.
  • Crane JM, Hutchens D. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(5):579–587.
  • Son M, Grobman WA, Ayala NK, et al. A universal mid-trimester transvaginal cervical length screening program and its associated reduced preterm birth rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(3):365.e1-5–365.e5.
  • Souka AP, Papastefanou I, Michalitsi V, et al. Cervical length changes from the first to second trimester of pregnancy, and prediction of preterm birth by first-trimester sonographic cervical measurement. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(7):997–1002.
  • Antsaklis P, Daskalakis G, Pilalis A, et al. The role of cervical length measurement at 11-14 weeks for the prediction of preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(3):465–470.
  • Liu B, Xu G, Sun Y, et al. Association between maternal pre-pregnancy obesity and preterm birth according to maternal age and race or ethnicity: a population-based study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(9):707–714.
  • Gravett MG, Rubens CE, Nunes TM. Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (2 of 7): discovery science. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(S1):23.
  • Maerdan M, Shi C, Zhang X, et al. The prevalence of short cervix between 20 and 24 weeks of gestation and vaginal progesterone for prolonging of gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(14):1646–1649.
  • Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(9):567–572.
  • Cwgo O. Chinese guidelines for the prevention and control of overweight and obesity in adults. Ying Yang Xue Bao. 2004;26:1–4.
  • Fischer-Betz R, Specker C. Pregnancy in systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2017;31(3):397–414.
  • Moore TR, Cayle JE. The amniotic fluid index in normal human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162(5):1168–1173.
  • Harrell FE, Jr., Lee KL, Pollock BG. Regression models in clinical studies: determining relationships between predictors and response. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988;80(15):1198–1202.
  • Granese R, Mantegna S, Mondello S, et al. Preterm birth: incidence, risk factors and second trimester cervical length in a single center population. A two-year retrospective study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21(19):4270–4277.
  • Granese R, Gitto E, D’Angelo G, et al. Preterm birth: seven-year retrospective study in a single centre population. Ital J Pediatr. 2019;45(1):45.
  • Palomba S, de Wilde MA, Falbo A, et al. Pregnancy complications in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(5):575–592.
  • Hu CY, Li FL, Jiang W, et al. Pre-pregnancy health status and risk of preterm birth: a large, Chinese, rural, population-based study. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:4718–4727.
  • Ancel PY, Lelong N, Papiernik E, et al. History of induced abortion as a risk factor for preterm birth in European countries: results of the EUROPOP survey. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(3):734–740.
  • Acharya G, Kjeldberg I, Hansen SM, et al. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;272(2):109–112.
  • Jin G, LanLan Z, Li C, et al. Pregnancy outcome following loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(1):85–99.
  • Xiong YQ, Mo Y, Luo QM, et al. The risk of human papillomavirus infection for spontaneous abortion, spontaneous preterm birth, and pregnancy rate of assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018;83(5):417–427.
  • Yan H, Gao S, Li N, et al. Impact of cervical length on preterm birth in northern China: a prospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(19):3209–3214.
  • Conoscenti G, Meir YJ, D'Ottavio G, et al. Does cervical length at 13-15 weeks' gestation predict preterm delivery in an unselected population?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(2):128–134.
  • Salomon LJ, Diaz-Garcia C, Bernard JP, et al. Reference range for cervical length throughout pregnancy: non-parametric LMS-based model applied to a large sample. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(4):459–464.
  • Berghella V, Roman A, Daskalakis C, et al. Gestational age at cervical length measurement and incidence of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(2 Pt 1):311–317.
  • Cahill AG, Odibo AO, Caughey AB, et al. Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(6):548.e1-8–548.e8.
  • Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R. Predictive accuracy of changes in transvaginal sonographic cervical length over time for preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(6):789–801.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.