It is about time. The advantage of transabdominal cervical length screening

References

• Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller A-B, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Heal. 2019;7(1):e37–e46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarde A, Lutsiv O, Beyene J, et al. Vaginal progesterone, oral progesterone, 17-OHPC, cerclage, and pessary for preventing preterm birth in at-risk singleton pregnancies: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy. 2019;126(5):556–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero R, Conde-Agudelo A, Da Fonseca E, et al. Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a short cervix: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2):161–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Da Fonseca E, et al. Vaginal progesterone is as effective as cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth in women with a singleton gestation, previous spontaneous preterm birth, and a short cervix: updated indirect comparison meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(1):10–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Medley N. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6(6):CD008991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM, et al. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):663–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purisch SE, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Epidemiology of preterm birth. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(7):387–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orzechowski KM, Boelig RC, Baxter JK, et al. A universal transvaginal cervical length screening program for preterm birth prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(3):520–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh J, Feltovich H, Berghella V, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Electronic address: [email protected], et al. The role of routine cervical length screening in selected high- and low-risk women for preterm birth prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(3):B2–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(9):567–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ven J, van Os MA, Kazemier BM, et al. The capacity of mid-pregnancy cervical length to predict preterm birth in low-risk women: a national cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(11):1223–1234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenberg P. Universal cervical length screening for singleton pregnancies with no history of preterm delivery, or the inverse of the Pareto principle. BJOG. 2017;124(7):1038–1045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Publications Committee, with assistance of Vincenzo Berghella. Progesterone and preterm birth prevention: translating clinical trials data into clinical practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:376–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Agudelo A, et al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(2):124.e1-19–124.e19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan SS, Romero R, Vidyadhari D, for the PREGNANT Trial, et al. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(1):18–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca EB, Celik E, Parra M, Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group, et al. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(5):462–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Saccone G. Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;9(9):CD007235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt K, Crane J, Hutcheon J, et al. No. 374-universal cervical length screening. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(3):363–374.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim K, Butt K, Crane JM. No. 257-ultrasonographic cervical length assessment in predicting preterm birth in singleton pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40(2):e151–e164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeeb Khalifeh MD, Vincenzo Berghella M. Not transabdominal!. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(6):739–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman AM, Srinivas SK, Parry S, et al. Can transabdominal ultrasound be used as a screening test for short cervical length? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(3):190.e1–190.e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambiar JM, Pai MV, Reddy A, et al. Can transabdominal scan predict a short cervix by transvaginal scan? Obstet Gynecol Int. 2017;2017:3035718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh H-J, Ji Y, Il Jung CH, et al. Comparison of cervical lengths using transabdominal and transvaginal sonography in midpregnancy. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32(10):1721–1728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller ES, Grobman WA. Cost-effectiveness of transabdominal ultrasound for cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(6):546.e1–546.e6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figo Working Group On Best Practice In Maternal-Fetal Medicine, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Best practice in maternal-fetal medicine. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;128:80–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero ST, Holmgren CC, Feltovich H, et al. Cervical length screening. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33(12):2159–2163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Guidelines for performing ultrasound in pregnancy. Available from: https://cdn.mednet.co.il/2017/01. -guidlines in Hebrew]
   Google Scholar
• Kagan KO, Sonek J. How to measure cervical length. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(3):358–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souka AP, Papastefanou I, Pilalis A, et al. Implementation of universal screening for preterm delivery by mid-trimester cervical-length measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(3):396–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner EF, Hamel MS, Kelly Orzechowski M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening in singletons without a prior preterm birth: an update. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(4):554.e1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Einerson BD, Grobman WA, Miller ES. Cost-effectiveness of risk-based screening for cervical length to prevent preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(1):100.e1-100–e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salih Basama FM, Crosfill F, Price A. The gender of the examiner, the state of the pregnancy and women’s perception of transvaginal sonography in the first trimester. Eur J Ultrasound. 2003;16(3):237–241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dutta RL, Economides DL. Patient acceptance of transvaginal sonography in the early pregnancy unit setting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22(5):503–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basama FMS, Crosfill F, Price A. Women's perception of transvaginal sonography in the first trimester; in an early pregnancy assessment unit. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2004;269(2):117–120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bennett CC, Richards DS. Patient acceptance of endovaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;15(1):52–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite JM, Economides DL. Acceptability by patients of transvaginal sonography in the elective assessment of the first-trimester fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9(2):91–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aj van der V. Patient?s Preferences for Management Options in Relation to Preterm Birth. J Heal Med Informatics. 2015;06.
   Google Scholar
• Masters HR, Warshak C, Sinclair S, et al. Time required to complete transvaginal cervical length in women receiving universal cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2020;1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman AM, Schwartz N, Ludmir J, et al. Can transabdominal ultrasound identify women at high risk for short cervical length? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(6):637–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng C-R, Chen C-P, Wang K-G, et al. The reliability of transabdominal cervical length measurement in a low-risk obstetric population: comparison with transvaginal measurement. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;54(2):167–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saul LL, Kurtzman JT, Hagemann C, et al. Is transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method of cervical length assessment? J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27(9):1305–1311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marren AJ, Mogra R, Pedersen LH, et al. Ultrasound assessment of cervical length at 18–21 weeks’ gestation in an Australian obstetric population: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal approaches. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;54(3):250–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar