Sonographic cervical length predicts vaginal delivery after previous cesarean section in women with low Bishop score induced with a double-balloon catheter

References

• Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, et al. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLOS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray SF, Serani Pradenas F. Cesarean birth trends in Chile, 1986 to 1994. Birth. 1997;24(4):258–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrescio-Higa F, Valdes N. Publicly insured caesarean sections in private hospitals: a repeated cross-sectional analysis in Chile. BMJ Open. 2019;9(4):e024241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangal VB, Giri PA, Shinde KK, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean section. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5(2):140–144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Phillippe HJ, et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet. 1996;347(8997):281–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gommers JSM, Diederen M, Wilkinson C, et al. Risk of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications associated with the use of the transcervical balloon catheter in induction of labour: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;218:73–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoorel EN, van Kuijk SM, Melman S, et al. Vaginal birth after a caesarean section: the development of a Western European population-based prediction model for deliveries at term. BJOG. 2014;121(2):194–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashwal E, Wertheimer A, Aviram A, et al. Prediction of successful trial of labor after cesarean - the benefit of prior vaginal delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:2665–2670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Kataria Y, Wang Z, et al. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vital M, Grange J, Le Thuaut A, et al. Predictive factors for successful cervical ripening using a double-balloon catheter after previous cesarean delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;142(3):288–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries B, Narayan R, McGeechan K, et al. Is sonographically measured cervical length at 37 weeks of gestation associated with intrapartum cesarean section? A prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(6):668–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migliorelli F, Banos N, Angeles MA, et al. Clinical and sonographic model to predict cesarean delivery after induction of labor at term. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;46(2):88–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo G, Aloisio F, Yacoub M, et al. Ultrasound assessment of the cervix in predicting successful membrane sweeping: a prospective observational study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;1–7. (Online ahead of print). DOI:10.1080/14767058.2019.1619689.
   Google Scholar
• Alanwar A, Hussein SH, Allam HA, et al. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length versus Bishop score in labor induction at term for prediction of caesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;1–211. DOI:10.1080/14767058.2019.1659770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Miguel Manso S, Alvarez Colomo C, Gobernado Tejedor J, et al. Ultrasound examination of the cervix for predicting labor induction success: failed validation in a routine clinical setting of a successful previous pilot study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301(1):75–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park KH, Kim SN, Lee SY, et al. Comparison between sonographic cervical length and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(2):198–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas SS, Orzechowski KM, Berghella V, et al. Second trimester cervical length and its association with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33:20–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beloosesky R, Khatib N, Ganem N, et al. Cervical length measured before delivery and the success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(4):464–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheuk QKY, Lo TK, Lee CP, et al. Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in Chinese women with previous caesarean section: one-year experience and literature review. Hong Kong Med J. 2015;21:243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bonrostro Torralba C, Tejero Cabrejas EL, Marti Gamboa S, et al. Double-balloon catheter for induction of labour in women with a previous cesarean section, could it be the best choice? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(5):1135–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YR, Pu CX, Wang XY, et al. Double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone insert for labour induction: a meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299(1):7–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West HM, Jozwiak M, Dodd JM. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD009792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan KO, Sonek J. How to measure cervical length. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(3):358–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 8th ed. Boston: Cengaje Learning; 2016. p.827.
   Google Scholar
• Acock AC. A gentle introduction to stata. 4th ed. College Station: Stata Press; 2014. p.468.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbe JM. Logistic regression models. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009. p.637.
   Google Scholar
• Nattino G, Lemeshow S, Phillips G, et al. Assessing the calibration of dichotomous outcome models with the calibration belt. Stata J. 2017;17(4):1003–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeman LM, Plante LA. Patient-choice vaginal delivery? Ann Fam Med. 2006;4(3):265–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisen AB, Lokkegaard EC, Fuglsang J. Double-balloon catheter for induction of labor in 362 women with and without prior cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019;4:100033.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boujenah J, Fleury C, Tigaizin A, et al. Induction of labor in women with previous caesarean delivery with balloon catheter: is it worth it? [Article in French]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019;47:273–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehl S, Weiss C, Rath W. Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;204:44–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singal AG, Higgins PD, Waljee AK. A primer on effectiveness and efficacy trials. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2014;5:e45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman G. Chile: denied indigenouss and mestizos [Article in Spanish]. Polit Cult. 2004;21:97–110.
   Google Scholar