Early versus delayed oxytocin infusion following amniotomy for induction of labor: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

References

• Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, et al. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. (WHO/RHR/15.02).
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Robson classification: implementation manual. Publication date: 2017. ISBN: 978-92-4-151319-7.
   Google Scholar
• Wood S, Cooper S, Ross S. Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in women with intact membranes. BJOG: Int J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2014;121(6):674–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saccone G, Berghella V. Induction of labor at full term in uncomplicated singleton gestations: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(5):629–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Caughey AB. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(4):304–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei S, Wo BL, Qi HP, et al. Early amniotomy and early oxytocin for prevention of, or therapy for, delay in first stage spontaneous labour compared with routine care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(8):Cd006794.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Recommendations for augmentation of labour. highlights and key messages from World Health Organization’s 2014 global recommendations. April 2015; [cited 2020 Mar 20]. Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=15&ved=2ahUKEwiH8Ivb67ToAhXxk4sKHfjkDxIQFjAOegQIChAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fapps.who.int%2Firis%2Fbitstream%2F10665%2F174001%2F1%2FWHO_RHR_15.05_eng.pdf%3Fua%3D1&usg=AOvVaw3PUyyCZjkrbSnq2GkqVXzw.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):e1–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen VM, Baskett TF, O’Connell CM, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes with increasing duration of the second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(6):1248–1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IntHout J, Ioannidis JPA, Borm GF. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IntHout J, Ioannidis JPA, Rovers MM, et al. Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7):e010247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pergialiotis V, Kotrogianni P, Koutaki D, et al. Umbilical cord coiling index for the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a meta-analysis and sequential analysis. J Matern-Fetal Neonat Med. 2020;33(23):4022–4028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bala A, Bagga R, Kalra J, et al. Early versus delayed amniotomy during labor induction with oxytocin in women with Bishop’s score of >/=6: a randomized trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(22):2994–3001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy R, Ferber A, Ben-Arie A, et al. A randomised comparison of early versus late amniotomy following cervical ripening with a Foley catheter. BJOG: Int J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2002;109(2):168–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross MM, Fromke C, Hecker H. The timing of amniotomy, oxytocin and neuraxial analgesia and its association with labour duration and mode of birth. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(1):41–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemminki E, Lenck M, Saarikoski S, et al. Ambulation versus oxytocin in protracted labour: a pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1985;20(4):199–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanch G, Lavender T, Walkinshaw S, et al. Dysfunctional labour: a randomised trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(1):117–120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bidgood KA, Steer PJ. A randomized control study of oxytocin augmentation of labour. 1. Obstetric outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;94(6):512–517.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hinshaw K, Simpson S, Cummings S, et al. A randomised controlled trial of early versus delayed oxytocin augmentation to treat primary dysfunctional labour in nulliparous women. BJOG: Int J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2008;115(10):1289–1296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titulaer LML, de Wolf GS, Bakkum EA, et al. Delayed versus immediate oxytocin infusion after amniotomy for induction of labour: a randomised controlled pilot trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;240:357–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan PC, Soe MZ, Sulaiman S, et al. Immediate compared with delayed oxytocin after amniotomy labor induction in parous women: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(2, PART 1):253–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dencker A, Berg M, Bergqvist L, et al. Early versus delayed oxytocin augmentation in nulliparous women with prolonged labour-a randomised controlled trial. BJOG: Int J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2009;116(4):530–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selo-Ojeme D, Pisal P, Lawal O, et al. A randomised controlled trial of amniotomy and immediate oxytocin infusion versus amniotomy and delayed oxytocin infusion for induction of labor at term. Obstetr Gynecol Survey. 2009;64:584–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osoti A, Sule K, Gachuno O. 24: Labor outcomes of immediate versus delayed oxytocin administration after amniotomy, a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2019;220:S21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHOWroawioptcodilM; [cited 2020 Mar 6]. Available from: https://extranet.who.int/rhl/topics/preconception-pregnancy-childbirth-and-postpartum-care/care-during-childbirth/care-during-labour-1st-stage/who-recommendation-augmentation-intravenous-oxytocin-prior-confirmation-delay-labour.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson M, Norden-Lindeberg S, Ostlund I, et al. Acidemia at birth, related to obstetric characteristics and to oxytocin use, during the last two hours of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(7):745–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernitz S, Oian P, Rolland R, et al. Oxytocin and dystocia as risk factors for adverse birth outcomes: a cohort of low-risk nulliparous women. Midwifery. 2014;30(3):364–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg A, Caughey AB. Augmentation of labor: a review of oxytocin augmentation and active management of labor. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017;44(4):593–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugg GJ, Siddiqui F, Thornton JG. Oxytocin versus no treatment or delayed treatment for slow progress in the first stage of spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(7):CD007123.
   Google Scholar
• Nachum Z, Garmi G, Kadan Y, et al. Comparison between amniotomy, oxytocin or both for augmentation of labor in prolonged latent phase: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar