https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1854-5311
References
- National Health Commission of China. Progress report on maternal and child health in China; 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/fys/s7901/201905/bbd8e2134a7e47958c5c9ef032e1dfa2.shtml
- Hu LQ, Flood P, Li Y, et al. No pain labor & delivery: a global health Initiative's impact on clinical outcomes in China. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(6):1931–1938.
- Obstetrics Subgroup, Chinese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese Medical Association. [The new standard and management of labor: expert consensus (2014)]. Chin J Obstetr Gynecol. 2014;49:486. (Chinese).
- Li HT, Hellerstein S, Zhou YB, et al. Trends in cesarean delivery rates in China, 2008–2018. JAMA. 2020;323(1):89–91.
- Li HT, Luo S, Trasande L, et al. Geographic variations and temporal trends in cesarean delivery rates in China, 2008–2014. JAMA. 2017;317(1):69–76.
- Yu Y, Zhang X, Sun C, et al. Reducing the rate of cesarean delivery on maternal request through institutional and policy interventions in Wenzhou. PLOS One. 2017;12(11):e0186304.
- Hu L-Q, Zhang J, Wong CA, et al. Impact of the introduction of neuraxial labor analgesia on mode of delivery at an urban maternity hospital in China. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;129(1):17–21.
- Robson MS. Classification of caesarean sections. Fet Matern Med Rev. 2001;12(1):23–39.
- Zhang YH, Gu N, Wang ZQ, et al. Use of the 10-Group Classification system to analyze how the population control policy change in China has affected cesarean delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2017;138(2):158–163.
- Brennan DJ, Robson MS, Murphy M, et al. Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(3):308.e1–308.e8.
- Gerli S, Favilli A, Franchini D, et al. Is the Robson’s classification system burdened by obstetric pathologies, maternal characteristics and assistential levels in comparing hospitals cesarean rates? A regional analysis of class 1 and 3. J Maternal-Fetal Neonat Med. 2018;31(2):173–177.
- WHO. Robson classification: implementation manual. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/robson-classification/en/
- Ming Y, Li M, Dai F, et al. Dissecting the current caesarean section rate in Shanghai, China. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):2080.
- Robson MS. The 10-Group Classification System – a new way of thinking. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(1):1–4.
- Zhang HX, Zhao YY, Wang YQ. Analysis of the characteristics of pregnancy and delivery before and after implementation of the two-child policy. Chin Med J. 2018;131(1):37–42.
- Lucovnik M, Blajic I, Verdenik I, et al. Impact of epidural analgesia on cesarean and operative vaginal delivery rates classified by the Ten Groups Classification System. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2018;34:37–41.
- Obstetrics Subgroup, Chinese Society of Obstetrics and Gynocology, Chinese Medical Association. [Consensus of management of vaginal birth after cesarean]. Chin J Obstetr Gynecol. 2016;51:561–564 (Chinese).
- Gilbert SA, Grobman WA, Landon MB, et al. Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(4):311.e1–311.e9.
- Mu Y, Li X, Zhu J, et al. Prior caesarean section and likelihood of vaginal birth, 2012–2016, China. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96(8):548–557.
- Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341–1348.
- Chen I, Opiyo N, Tavender E, et al. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9:CD005528.